Yes, hitting soft targets intentionally is bad news.
Israel has been knowingly hitting soft targets for decades, including using armor and machineguns on 8-year-old kids who threw stones at the Israeli armor.... as though the soldiers in the tanks or the tanks themselves were vulnerable to an 8-year-old tossing a rock.
The day after Doctors Without Borders gave their GPS coordinates of their hospital in Kabul to US Armed Forces, specifically so they wouldn't be fired upon, their hospital was 'accidentally' struck with US missiles. I'm sure it was mere coincidence and had nothing to do with the fact that DWB treats anyone who comes through their doors, as long as they leave any weapons at the entrance. <sarcasm>.
There is a historical aggressor in this decades-long skirmish, and it comes from the folks we, the United States, fund and arm so heavily, who we then turn a blind eye for their heinous and illegal transgressions.
If your neighbor came to your property, harmed your family members, and stole property/commandeered your home on a regular basis, shooting you and yours down routinely when you objected, including killing civilians in your family on the regular, how long would you wait to lock and load?
Me? About 10 seconds. No.. not even that long. Especially if I already knew that the proverbial or metaphorical cops wouldn't do anything about it and would even interfere in my making a formal complaint.
There can be no diplomatic solution as long as the US blocks International Law sanctions against Israel at the UN.
Well, not all people are religious nuts who believe in the fantasy of a caring supreme god and/or are patriot zealots and follow the associated dogma/propaganda. It is unfortunate that such limited weak thinkers comprise the main activities of humanity and its effects upon the world. Such people are the world leaders and thus we have wars to the delight of the weapons manufacturers who go to church on Sundays.Yeah, I thought that was a very contradictory post. I don't get the 'these people' reference either, 'those people' are no different than 'us people'. It's like taking a clone of mine to your tent then calling it something different, it's only different in your mind, in the end it's still weed...
The people are afraid to rise up. Majority rule by a small minority is called cooperation.Absolute bollocks, it's like dictatorships have never existed, go to North Korea and test your theory.
or being brainwashed1 person cannot force 200,000,000 people to do anything without a large portion of the population either laying down, or agreeing.
I did march back then but don't feel too vindicated given the result. The Vietnam War wasn't very popular, a whole bunch of people dissented and vocalized their objection to it. It didn't stop the powers that be from conscripting peoples' sons and sending them into the jungle though.There are always exceptions. But there is a reason these people have been fighting for generations.
Leaders don’t cause wars. The support of citizens is required. Every American that didn’t march on Washington to stop bush from killing millions has blood on their hands.
What's their alternative though? Just as bad if not worse. Biden can't save face though, you can't cater to both sides here. He is trying to launch some campaign to counter Islamophobia and no one is showing up because for Arabs that effort is not comparable with backing Israel in this conflict.
Very big Crater - maybe a Explosive-depot in the Tunnels
What's their alternative though? Just as bad if not worse. Biden can't save face though, you can't cater to both sides here. He is trying to launch some campaign to counter Islamophobia and no one is showing up because for Arabs that effort is not comparable with backing Israel in this conflict.
I think you misunderstood me. I'm saying Biden is trying to walk that line of catering to both sides and it is impossible for him to do so. I'm not saying that anyone should be overlooked.really?
disgusting.
And that's the fucking problem when one of the two sides committing atrocities is supposedly an ally.Neither side gives a crap about the civilians.
Unfortunately that buddy probably has a lot of dirt on the US and neither the US or the buddy have much integrity in all reality. The US will probably try to come up with some story of why the drunk deserved to be beaten to death and sell that to the world.And that's the fucking problem when one of the two sides committing atrocities is supposedly an ally.
When your buddy is kicking the crap out of a drunk in the street, you're supposed to be the voice of reason and stop your friend from killing the drunk. Not let him keep going while shrugging your shoulders and saying, "What are you gonna do?"
Again bollocks, if we are taking North Korea as an example they are repressed there's no cooperation going on whatsoever. How do you propose they rise up against this "cooperation" with no weapons? Perhaps they should just ask for some...The people are afraid to rise up. Majority rule by a small minority is called cooperation.
I'm curious as to how my acquaintances and I are so prone to encountering these 'exceptions', and others like yourself are so prone to encountering the negative side consisting of blood-thirsty monsters?There are always exceptions. But there is a reason these people have been fighting for generations.
Leaders don’t cause wars. The support of citizens is required. Every American that didn’t march on Washington to stop bush from killing millions has blood on their hands.
You mean like this bomb crater in Laos?Very big Crater - maybe a Explosive-depot in the Tunnels