At first you wrote of ”a jewish/israeli bloodline”, and since the terms jew/jewish and israeli designate the modern social construct of a so called jewish people without physical relation to the hebrew israelites your reference seemed confusing to me even though it was obviously clear on your end. Thank you for clarifying.I was not confusing anything. I was obviously referring to ancient Israelites and did state that there were those who dispute the man's heritage as he held to personally. This was to exemplify the misuse of the term Semite. Unpopularized union of bloodlines.
LOTS of Israelis/Jewish people are dark complected, and ALL have dark hair that i've seen. beards too...jumping to conclusions again.one look at dudes complexion is all i need to know as to why he was droned by friendly fire lmao.
So you finally understand what Kanye is saying AOH?LOTS of Israelis/Jewish people are dark complected, and ALL have dark hair that i've seen. beards too...jumping to conclusions again.
to be honest, i've never read an article about him, or an interview with him, and don't know what he might have said. ditto with nearly any other "celebrity" you might name. i think my own thoughts, and want others do the same. don't let anyone else do your thinking for you, ever! if you are going to be right OR wrong, be yourself, be original.So you finally understand what Kanye is saying AOH?
heads up. i DID read an interview with the disgraced corrupt former face of the NRA (Wayne LaDickhead) saying he okayed helicopter rides for executives/friends/guests so they didn't have to sit in traffic like the little people they soaked for donations to pay for their rides...ditto with nearly any other "celebrity" you might name.
new day, new war crime
international law and rules based order is dead
new day, new war crime
international law and rules based order is dead
We unequivocally condemn Nancy Pelosi’s false accusations against peace activists she doesn’t like. Read our letter of rebuke here. |
On Sunday, Pelosi hit the airwaves to call on the FBI to investigate ceasefire protesters for foreign influence. “I think some of these protesters are spontaneous and organic and sincere,” she said. “Some, I think, are connected to Russia.” We’d heard that line of reasoning before: from J. Edgar Hoover himself. When J. Edgar Hoover was in charge of the FBI, the FBI tracked what it dubbed the “Communist Line,” the position of the Communist Party on every issue imaginable. The FBI would compare the views of individuals targeted by the FBI to these volumes documenting what the Communists thought about women’s rights or foreign policy. By showing someone had the same views as the Communist Party on the poll tax or constitutionality of warrantless wiretaps, the FBI believed it had proven that person adopted the Communist line. The FBI and other three-letter agencies conducted surveillance on a grand scale to discredit domestic dissent as foreign influence or communist-inspired. History did not judge kindly the FBI’s Cold War-era surveillance tactics, nor the NSA’s MINARET and the CIA’s CHAOS programs that surveilled domestic dissent to uncover foreign influence. But this week, Speaker Pelosi is asking the FBI to resurrect such tactics to investigate protesters calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. As a civil liberties organization that has long documented the abusive surveillance of the FBI and other government agencies, as well as been the victims of it ourselves, we know all too well that Pelosi’s comments are not to be treated as stray remarks. On Monday, we sent Speaker Emerita Pelosi a clear message: she owes it to her constituents, country, and the Constitution to retract her statements and apologize for them. Instead of repeating the logic used to surveil the civil rights and anti-Vietnam War movements, she should learn from past abuses and emphatically uphold the right to dissent - with no Palestine exception. ""<<< |
They should probably get off their land and go back to where they came from.first they are "killing civilians en masse", and are told to be more "surgical" in their attacks. i don't know how much more "surgical" or "directed" it could be than to send 3 people into a building to kill those hiding there behind civilians. what do you want? should they send engraved invitations and ask them to step outside? what ??? what method of dealing with Hamas would you folks find satisfactory other than to surrender to them ? i'll wait, i'm retired.
They should probably get off their land and go back to where they came from.