-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
War
- Thread starter Creeperpark
- Start date
vocabulary builder word of the day: quislidiots: quisling idiots
once that happened, coincidentally Tulsi changed her message on the situation lmao
Brother Nature
Well-known member
Yeah, except America isn't annexing Mexico and then threatening nuclear war because the other countries took their piggy bank away.
ButterflyEffect
Well-known member
It is you who has made a logical fallacy. Actually, it is the hypocrite who is weak (in a debate or argument). Pointing out that something is the opposite of what an opponent says, is not a logical fallacy, btw. Unless you can give a logical explanation... ^Ooh, so close!
Go ahead, make my day...
Would you care some mustard for the pretzel you're twisting yourself into there? It seems a tasty hors d'oeuvres for your word salad, nonetheless.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
I'd love some!
And then, maybe after the hors d'oeuvres, you can substantiate your argument, lol.
ButterflyEffect
Well-known member
Playing all the classic hits!!
"Whataboutism" - Also known as an Appeal to Hypocrisy or more formally a Tu Quoque fallacy, is when a person attempts to divert blame or wave away criticism of something using blatant hypocrisy to neutralize criticism and distract from the issue.
Keep up those bad faith arguments like Fox, Q, OAN, Newsmax, Breitbart, The Gateway Pundit, The Federalist, trump, and all of your totally real Facebook friends, have taught you. You've learned well.
/Send money now!!!
//Help us defeat those evil, satanic, baby-killing, radical, leftists before we lose everything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!1!!!
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
I see you can copy/paste. Impressive. And what is the source of that precious tidbit that you've pasted here for us?
ButterflyEffect
Well-known member
I'd love some!
And then, maybe after the hors d'oeuvres, you can substantiate your argument, lol.
There's nothing to "substantiate", friend. You attempted, poorly, to deflect from what Russia is demonstrably doing to Ukraine by saying, with a meme no less, that "The US did it a bunch of times so you have no moral ground. Putin can do what he wants. I aM veRy SmaRt!!"
Does that define my statement well enough for you? I suspect it likely will not.
ButterflyEffect
Well-known member
Drop what I've said into your favorite search engine if you're so confident of your accusation. I think it's fair to note that your attempt to utilize the 'trick' of making an unfounded accusation toward me and then having me disprove your claim will not bode very well for you, friend.
It's patently obvious to anyone fixed in reality that you're punching way above your weight class. But as I like to say when I'm in that mood....Do go on.
Indeed. I have had a few try to kill me with buckets too, and they succeeded more than once.
Lol, Hempy. Your entire shtick is cut and paste from very dubious sources.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
You did not explain the 'logical fallacy' aspect of your claim (because you can't).
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
I use quotation marks for anything that is not my original thoughts. And, always substantiated.
I am siding with the communist, comrade
https://odysee.com/@proletariantv:2/donbass,-ukraine,-russia-and-nato-dean:6
ButterflyEffect
Well-known member
Did you notice that I paraphrased? No? Didn't think you'd understand the distinction between them. Not that whether I copied the definition of something has any bearing on my point, which it does not in case you're curious.
ButterflyEffect
Well-known member
Because you can't understand or see what I've posted reflects more on you than it does anyone else. Maybe someone else can explain it to you. Are there any 5th graders nearby to help with that?
