What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

The Search for Trip Weed

Waldgeist

Active member
'I finally bought a timer for my veg cabinet'

you will feel the force:biggrin:



ghanas around 70 days

picture.php
picture.php
picture.php

picture.php


i think #5 is proper,its not much doin for a week, i flush it for another and take it down.
 

red rider

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Waldgeist beautiful plants! How did you grow them so well in 20oz of soil? That's incredible.
 

Bombasquatch

New member
jamaican weed

jamaican weed

i smoked some jamaican varieties grown locally recently. and they knocked me on my ass. sent me back in time to munchies and laughing days.
 

HatchBrew

Active member
Veteran
I miss my SAGE...fucking amazing high!!!!!!! Had it back decade plus ago. Lost it in the move.
It was up there with Dumpster, Bubblegum, tutty-fruity & all the other banging Great Lake strains.

Want to re-create "it" myself. Have the Big Sur Holy Weed for the Sativa side, need to pick my Afghani/hash Plant. Will Go both ways with the project Indica male to Sativa Female + Indica Female w/ Sativa male. Looking for equilibrium right?...so f13 it'll be....I need more time and space...

On top of the twenty other projects on my list. Glad I started young....Took me this long to figure out what I wanted. One generation at a time....
 

MostlyMe

Active member
Veteran
Here is some very advanced discussion on the use of UV lights I think people following this thread will appreciate.

It's such a complicated issue. I can certainly see why you would want to emulate the outdoor in your grow room, especially for landraces or strains close to that. But the question is: can you, realistically? Not only do you need UVA and UVB, you need them in roughly the same ratio as outside (UVA may be counterproductive, while UVB almost certainly increases THC). Is there really a bulb or combination of bulbs that can do that? Also, take into account particularly UVB is strongly absorbed by air. Either you need a very strong light source, or you need the light sources very close to your plants. I am curious: UV light users, do you actually know - from measurements or info from the manufacturer - what UV spectrum actually makes it to your buds, and how much?

I think it's fair to say the average grower doesn't need UV supplementation. The trait may have even been lost through generations of breeding under HPS anyway. But in the quest for trip weed it may be very important, but the question is how to get it right!
 

Riddleme

Member
Here is some very advanced discussion on the use of UV lights I think people following this thread will appreciate.

It's such a complicated issue. I can certainly see why you would want to emulate the outdoor in your grow room, especially for landraces or strains close to that. But the question is: can you, realistically? Not only do you need UVA and UVB, you need them in roughly the same ratio as outside (UVA may be counterproductive, while UVB almost certainly increases THC). Is there really a bulb or combination of bulbs that can do that? Also, take into account particularly UVB is strongly absorbed by air. Either you need a very strong light source, or you need the light sources very close to your plants. I am curious: UV light users, do you actually know - from measurements or info from the manufacturer - what UV spectrum actually makes it to your buds, and how much?

I think it's fair to say the average grower doesn't need UV supplementation. The trait may have even been lost through generations of breeding under HPS anyway. But in the quest for trip weed it may be very important, but the question is how to get it right!

I am very close, still tweakin, yes, but very close :biggrin:
 

Siever

Well-known member
Veteran
Here
I think it's fair to say the average grower doesn't need UV supplementation. The trait may have even been lost through generations of breeding under HPS anyway. But in the quest for trip weed it may be very important, but the question is how to get it right!

That, indeed, might be possible. If you look at those cavedwellings with absolutely no pigment in their skin: They too evolved from creatures which needed the sun to stay healthy. If you'd put them in the sun as they are now, they most probably would burn.

Siever
 

Madjag

Active member
Veteran
PAR

http://www.bmlhorticulture.com/about-par

Excerpt:

"Recently, I had a customer e-mail me about this very fixture. He had seen our published PPF values and said “I heard your fixtures had really high PAR -- but how can that be when the PAR is only 90 directly under the fixture...”

He was confusing the light emitted by the fixture which is 90 PPF (μmoles/second) with the light received by the plants, which is 375 PPFD (μmoles/m2/s). In this case, the 375 PPFD was measured six inches under the fixture.

As we have seen, the 375 PPFD is the important measurement of PAR -- the Photosynthetically Active Radiation that matters to the plants. Ideally, you want to take spot measurements across your plant growth area and then average these numbers to get the most meaningful PPFD metric for your plants. In most applications, we are interested in the average amount of light being delivered to the plants...not just the Max PPFD reading."

The world’s largest vertical farm, involved in growing tobacco for vaccine development:
http://www.illumitex.com/illumitex-project-greenvax/

Vertical local food farm in Chicago:
http://www.illumitex.com/thousand-p...stalled-innovative-chicagoland-vertical-farm/
 
Last edited:

MostlyMe

Active member
Veteran
I am very close, still tweakin, yes, but very close :biggrin:

That's a bold claim to make, my friend. I have no doubt you grow and breed excellent bud, but proving your UV setup contributes to the excellence is another question entirely IMO. For starters, how much UVA and UVB actually makes it to your canopy?

Sorry, being trained as a scientist, and now a journalist, skepticism is in my nature. I believe the process of challenging claims and generally poking at "common knowledge" brings progress, so I hope you are willing to oblige :tiphat:

That, indeed, might be possible. If you look at those cavedwellings with absolutely no pigment in their skin: They too evolved from creatures which needed the sun to stay healthy. If you'd put them in the sun as they are now, they most probably would burn.

Siever

For most growers, it doesn't really matter if it's true or not because we know UV is not necessary for great bud. The most commonly used light sources for growing don't have any UV, but the product still knocks your socks off. But, again, for weed that is the best of the best - or indeed trippy - there might be different requirements. In any case, we need to consider that response to UV is strain dependent.
 

Riddleme

Member
That's a bold claim to make, my friend. I have no doubt you grow and breed excellent bud, but proving your UV setup contributes to the excellence is another question entirely IMO. For starters, how much UVA and UVB actually makes it to your canopy?

Sorry, being trained as a scientist, and now a journalist, skepticism is in my nature. I believe the process of challenging claims and generally poking at "common knowledge" brings progress, so I hope you are willing to oblige :tiphat:



For most growers, it doesn't really matter if it's true or not because we know UV is not necessary for great bud. The most commonly used light sources for growing don't have any UV, but the product still knocks your socks off. But, again, for weed that is the best of the best - or indeed trippy - there might be different requirements. In any case, we need to consider that response to UV is strain dependent.

I know it is :biggrin: And I do not have a meter so the claim is anecdotal and suspect ,,,,,,,,,,,, agreed. But the high is so much better than without the UV added and the other clue is since I added it, every strain has become creeper weed, where before it wasn't.
 

pinkus

Well-known member
Veteran
As a devil's advocate I can't get over how other devil's advocate fluster me. :biggrin: It's quite possible that we haven't noticed a mechanism by which light outside the range what is now recognized as PAR. ;)

We didn't figure out photosystem 1 and 2 until about the mid 60's. I know that seems like forever ago but we really are just scratching the surface science wise. :tiphat:
 

satva

Member
Veteran
Have the Big Sur Holy Weed for the Sativa side,

What are the characteristics of the Sativa side? The sativa genetics are claimed to be Highland Zacatecas Mexican, correct? Zacatecas Purple ?
 

Waldgeist

Active member
Waldgeist beautiful plants! How did you grow them so well in 20oz of soil? That's incredible.

thanks man,

those 2 ghanas sit in 1,4 liter cocofibers each, treepots a 9x9x21cm - 47,34oz.
i take control of two factors, the starting size of the clone before i initiate flowering and its nutrition while, to make them grow like this.

the particular salt i used for the entire flowering of them is NPK 5-20-30, the ec never above 1.(still overfed)
the coco was used like soil, being handfed with wet/dry cycles and kept on the dry side.

tbh , i dont know if this is now right or wrong, i mean to force them like this with a somewhat controlled draught and very PK pronounced nutrition. the thing is, increased N will increase size(stretch, branching... whatever) and extend their flowering time.

like this, im able to finish ghana in about 10/11 weeks and could theoretically pull a nice mono of em.
i mean, thats about 5 harvests per year in my setups, and grown like this, G#1's structure is nice n soggy ...

with my next round ghanas, I'll use less media, 1-2 weeks of even NPK and then a slow N cut over whole flowering.

lets first see how those smoke after a cure.

heres a congo pointe noir x oth that got too much of everything, place it against those two ghanas, it only has a 7x7 rockwoolcube available, not 1,4 liter of something. started clawing fast when it ran over the 'good' enlightened area. thats even NPK for first 4 weeks.

picture.php


i put most of my clones to flower when they look like this after 7-8 days rooting, they only show a single root sometimes:

picture.php
picture.php
picture.php
picture.php

thats C5 x Malawi #1, the rockwool cube is put into the upper part of the treepot, the bottom half stays free.
15-10-15, ec 1,5, pH ~6 now for the first two weeks.

i told her she better be female and run for the light, lets see later

TB, rumored A5 side is columbiana, C5 thaiish -

it better be not just another golden tiger, 555.

best
 

BoldAsLove

Member
Veteran
MostlyMe- the info I have from my reptile light manufacturers is 70% blue spectrum, 20% UVA, 10% UVB. I'm familiar with that thread, and I wish knna would have linked research papers to his statement about UVA. From what I've read, the sun puts out a ratio somewhere in the neighborhood of 20:1 UVA to UVB. Maybe I missed something, but why is UVA bad? From what I've calculated, my lights when new would emit UVB irradiance of 253,440 J/day in an 11/13 schedule. When you then factor in the inverse square law and CFLs apparent lacking in UVB transmission, I don't know where they sit. I'd need a meter. They're getting older now and should be replaced, but I would guess not under the 13,000J/day irradiance mentioned. I know the reptisun bulbs got a bad name from the Foster and Smith research, but reptisun told me they reworked their design. Maybe they were just feeding me...

Wald, Ghana is looking great to me :) In my experience, I've found some plants yield more using a drier water schedule, but sometimes the taste can turn a little funky, you ever notice anything like that? Could be related to my organic ways, not sure..
 
Last edited:

MostlyMe

Active member
Veteran
I know it is And I do not have a meter so the claim is anecdotal and suspect ,,,,,,,,,,,, agreed. But the high is so much better than without the UV added and the other clue is since I added it, every strain has become creeper weed, where before it wasn't.

Glad we agree I definitely think your results deserve further investigation though. Any chance you would dive into that?

As a devil's advocate I can't get over how other devil's advocate fluster me. :biggrin: It's quite possible that we haven't noticed a mechanism by which light outside the range what is now recognized as PAR.

We didn't figure out photosystem 1 and 2 until about the mid 60's. I know that seems like forever ago but we really are just scratching the surface science wise. :tiphat:

:woohoo: I flustered someone :biggrin:

Plants definitely respond to UV or a lack thereof, but as you say we don't know a lot about the mechanisms governing that response. It's all about if and how UV can help us grow better cannabis.

MostlyMe- the info I have from my reptile light manufacturers is 70% blue spectrum, 20% UVA, 10% UVB. I'm familiar with that thread, and I wish knna would have linked research papers to his statement about UVA. From what I've read, the sun puts out a ratio somewhere in the neighborhood of 20:1 UVA to UVB. Maybe I missed something, but why is UVA bad? From what I've calculated, my lights when new would emit UVB irradiance of 253,440 J/day in an 11/13 schedule. When you then factor in the inverse square law and CFLs apparent lacking in UVB transmission, I don't know where they sit. I'd need a meter. They're getting older now and should be replaced, but I would guess not under the 13,000J/day irradiance mentioned. I know the reptisun bulbs got a bad name from the Foster and Smith research, but reptisun told me they reworked their design. Maybe they were just feeding me...

I don't know if UVA is bad, I just picked that as an example. The point I was trying to make, is that if you want to supplement UV, it makes sense to mimic the sun. But then you need to mimic it properly! Reasoning like "the sun has UVB so I want UVB" and then installing a light that has UVB but also an amount of UVA that 100x the natural amount, might be counterproductive. Especially if the UVB doesn't even reach the canopy. It also might be fine, I don't know... I am just asking questions :)
 

Riddleme

Member
Glad we agree I definitely think your results deserve further investigation though. Any chance you would dive into that?



:woohoo: I flustered someone :biggrin:

Plants definitely respond to UV or a lack thereof, but as you say we don't know a lot about the mechanisms governing that response. It's all about if and how UV can help us grow better cannabis.



I don't know if UVA is bad, I just picked that as an example. The point I was trying to make, is that if you want to supplement UV, it makes sense to mimic the sun. But then you need to mimic it properly! Reasoning like "the sun has UVB so I want UVB" and then installing a light that has UVB but also an amount of UVA that 100x the natural amount, might be counterproductive. Especially if the UVB doesn't even reach the canopy. It also might be fine, I don't know... I am just asking questions :)

I just swapped out some more bulbs for the next round. And I gotta be honest here, I would rather put my money into more bulbs that I know work based on my head, than to spend it on a meter to answer a question that I'm not asking. And I don't mean that in a harsh way, simply being honest.

Empirical proof has already happened, I can name 20 growers that have either added T5 sidelighting or switched to T5's because of my experiments and smoke reports. I get visits from growers, they have come from all over. They smoke my herb and then say things like "we don't have nothin like this back east" and best version of that strain I have ever smoked.

Not to mention as I have posted that my friend (rip) Lumi had the good meter (6 grand) and tested the bulbs. I went and found his post the reading was 480 uw/m2 at 12 inches and I know you have seen my pics. Here is a Blue Dream 19 days from the flip and I ask how many growers get this kind of frost in less than 3 weeks of flower???
 

Attachments

  • bluesunrise.jpg
    bluesunrise.jpg
    86.3 KB · Views: 28

Riddleme

Member
and before someone thinks I just pulled that pic outta my pile, here is a garden shot. That Blue Dream bud is the one in the center of the pic closest to the light. As you can see it is less than 12 inches from a UV bulb.

The paths I take with my experiments is based on hours and hours of research, let me share some
 

Attachments

  • T_SAM_4440.jpg
    T_SAM_4440.jpg
    97.9 KB · Views: 23
Last edited:

Riddleme

Member
UV-B RADIATION EFFECTS ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS, GROWTH and CANNABINOID PRODUCTION OF TWO Cannabis sativa CHEMOTYPES

John Lydon2,*,
Alan H. Teramura1,
C. Benjamin Coffman3

Article first published online: 2 JAN 2008



Abstract

The effects of UV-B radiation on photosynthesis, growth and cannabinoid production of two greenhouse-grown C. sativa chemotypes (drug and fiber) were assessed. Terminal meristems of vegetative and reproductive tissues were irradiated for 40 days at a daily dose of 0, 6.7 or 13.4 kJ m-2 biologically effective UV-B radiation. Infrared gas analysis was used to measure the physiological response of mature leaves, whereas gas-liquid chromatography was used to determine the concentration of cannabinoids in leaf and floral tissue.


There were no significant physiological or morphological differences among UV-B treatments in either drug- or fiber-type plants. The concentration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), but not of other cannabinoids, in both leaf and floral tissues increased with UV-B dose in drug-type plants. None of the cannabinoids in fiber-type plants were affected by UV-B radiation.


The increased levels of Δ9-THC in leaves after irradiation may account for the physiological and morphological tolerance to UV-B radiation in the drug-type plants. However, fiber plants showed no comparable change in the level of cannabidiol (a cannabinoid with UV-B absorptive characteristics similar to Δ9 THC). Thus the contribution of cannabinoids as selective UV-B filters in C. sativa is equivocal.
 

Riddleme

Member
Marijuana OPTICS

An elaboration on the phytochemical process that makes THC
A Continuing updating manual

by Joe Knuc


The resin exuded by the glandular trichrome forms a sphere(1) that encases the head cells.(2)

When the resin spheres are separated from the dried plant material by electrostatic(3) attraction and placed on a microscope slide illuminated with a 100W incandescent bulb, they appear very dark when observed through a 300X microscope. Since orange, red, and infrared are the component wavelengths of incandescent light, and since the absorption of light makes an object dark or opaque to the frequency of the incoming wave, one can conclude that these wavelengths are probably not directly involved in energizing the cannabinoid pathway.(4)

However, the resin sphere is transparent to ultraviolet radiation.(5)

The author found through trial and error that only one glandular
trichome(6) exhibits the phytochemical process that will produce the amount of THC associated with pain relief, appetite stimulation and anti-nausea; euphoria and hallucinations are side-effects, however. This trichome is triggered into growth by either of the two ways that the floral bract is turned into fruit.(7)

Of all the ways that optics are involved in the phytochemical production of THC, the most interesting has to be how the head cells and cannabinoid molecules are tremendously magnified( by the resin sphere. These and other facts are curiously absent from the literature. The footnotes update the literature to include electrostatic separation of the resin sphere from the dried plant material and marijuana parthenocarpy.


(1) "For all spheres, a ray drawn perpendicular to the sphere's surface will intersect the center of the sphere, no matter what spot on the surface is picked, and the magnifying power(a) of a glass sphere is greater the smaller its size. A sphere of glass can also bring light that is heading to a focus behind it to a point within it, with freedom from two aberrations, spherial aberration and coma, but not from chromatic aberration. Chromatic aberration results when different wavelengths are focused on different planes and is the most difficult of the aberrations to correct. The human eye lens also exhibits chromatic aberration, but a yellow pigment(b) called the macula lutea in the fovea, an area at the rear of the eyeball, corrects this problem by the way it absorbs blue light."

(a)"The formula to calculate the magnifying power of a sphere is l=333/d, where l is the magnifying power and d is the diameter of the sphere expressed in mm."

(b)Interestingly, the resin exuded by drug-type flowering female marijuana plants has a yellow tint. Could this pigment work to correct chromatic aberration in the resin sphere like the macula lutea does in the fovea for the eyeball?



(2) Quoting from the Mahlberg and Kim study of hemp(a) "THC accumulated in abundance in the secretory cavity where it was associated with the following: cell walls, surface feature of secretory vesicles, fibrillar material released from disc cell wall, and cuticle. It was not associated with the content of the secretory vesicles."

The resin spheres contain the THC. It is not contained in the leaf or floral bract. After the resin spheres are dissolved in solvent or dislodged by electrostatic attraction, and a microscopic examination of the leaf or floral bract has revealed that only the glandular trichomes' stalks remain, no effect will be felt after smoking the dried plant material from which the resin spheres have been removed.



(3) The electrostatic collection of the resin spheres from dried marijuana plants with plenty of ripe seeds has been for hundreds of years the method indigenous people of North Africa and Lebanon have used to make hashish. Obtain a round metal can 8" or so in diameter x 3" or so in depth (the kind that cookies come in) with a smooth lid. Obtain 2 ounces of dried marijuana with plenty of ripe seeds in the tops. To remove the seeds and stems, sift the marijuana tops through a 10-hole-to-the-inch wire kitchen strainer into the can. Close the can with the lid and vigorously shake the closed can three or four times. This gives the resin spheres an excess negative charge. Let the can sit for a moment and then remove the lid. Opposites attract. The negative-charged resin spheres have been attracted to the metal surface of the can and lid which has a positive charge. Take a matchbook cover or credit card and draw the edge across the surface of the lid. Note the collected powder. Observed under 300X magnification, the collected powder from this "shake" is composed of resin spheres with an occasional non-glandular trichome. As the marijuana is shaken again and again, and more of the yellow resin spheres are removed from the plant material, the collected powder gradually becomes green-colored as the number of non-glandular trichomes increases in the collected powder. The greener the powder, the less the effect.



(4) "Cannabinoids represent a dimer consisting of a terpene and a phenol component. Cannabigerol (CBG) is the first component of the pathway. It undergoes chemical change to form either cannabichromene (CBC), or cannabidiol (CBD). Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is derived from CBD."



(5) "Pate (1983) indicated that in areas of high ultraviolet radiation exposure, the UVB (280-320 nm) absorption properties of THC may have conferred an evolutionary advantage to Cannabis capable of greater production of this compound from biogenetic precursor CBD. The extent to which this production is also influenced by environmental UVB has also been experimentally determined by Lydon et al. (1987)."

The author's own experience allow for a more specific conclusion: If the UVB photon is missing from the light stream(a), or the intensity as expressed in µW/cm2 falls below a certain level(b), the phytochemical process will not be completely energized with only UVA photons which are more penetrating but less energetic, and the harvested resin spheres will have mostly precursor compounds and not fully realized THC(c).

(a)Examples of an environment where the UVB photon would be missing from the light stream include all indoor cultivation illuminated by mercury or sodium lamps and in glass, polyethylene or fiberglass covered greenhouses.

(b)"The maximum UVB irradiance near the equator (solar elevation angle less than 25 deg.) under clear, sunny skies is about 250 µW/cm2. It was observed that the daily solar UVB in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (N24.4Lat.) decreased from September to December by about 40% (Hannan et al. 1984)." The further a person is from the tropics, the less UVB radiation there is: the average annual exposure of a person living in Hawaii is approximately four times that of someone living in northern Europe. "Some reptiles, mainly lizards, turtles, tortoises and crocodilians, require UVB to make vitamin D3. Green Iguanas will start to show signs of metabolic bone disease at 6 months of age if not exposed to UVB wavelengths. A rubber jaw, shaking and non-use of hind legs are all signs of metabolic bone disease. Metabolic bone disease is perhaps the most common nutritional deficiency affecting captive reptiles. UVA and UVB wavelengths help to prevent or reverse this disease which is commonly seen in young captive lizards; these wavelengths also help to increase appetite and activity in lizards and turtles who require more UVA and UVB than pythons and snakes to induce reproductive behavior. Even though snakes get their vitamin D3 from the livers of the animals they eat (mice, rats, etc.), snakes and amphibians benefit from the UVA wavelength." Below are some UVB readings taken in Hoyleton, Illinois, on a clear sunny day in June by David Krughoff as reported in Reptile Lighting 2000.

7am: 12 microwatts/cm2
8am: 74 microwatts/cm2
9am: 142 microwatts/cm2
10am: 192 microwatts/cm2
11am: 233 microwatts/cm2
12pm: 256 microwatts/cm2
1pm: 269 microwatts/cm2
2pm: 262 microwatts/cm2
3pm: 239 microwatts/cm2
4pm: 187 microwatts/cm2
5pm: 131 microwatts/cm2
6pm: 61 microwatts/cm2


(c)Cannabinoid pathway: Anywhere in this pathway UVB does a better job than UVA in energizing a phytochemical reaction that will produce more fully realized THC because "all cannabinolic compounds show an absorption maximum between 270 and 280 nm in the ultraviolet region."



(6) Capitate-stalked glandular trichome.



(7) #1: The ovum has been fertilized and there is a seed developing: In the areas of the Northern Hemisphere where indigenous people have grown heterozygous drug-type marijuana for hundreds of years, pollination is used to trigger the growth of the capitate-stalked glandular trichome on the floral bract and concomitant leaves of the flowering females before the autumnal equinox(a) so the majority of seeds will be ripe(b) by mid-October.

(7) #2: The floral bract has become parthenocarpic: Parthenocarpic fruits develop without fertilization and have no seeds. Except for transmutation and turning lead into gold, there has been more nonsense written about seedless marijuana than on any other subject. In marijuana parthenocarpy, the floral bract (the fruit) enlarges in size as though there were a seed growing inside, and the capitate-stalked glandular trichome is triggered into growth on the floral bract and concomitant leaves. "Most popular supermarket tomatoes are parthenocarpic which was induced artificially by the application of dilute hormone sprays (such as auxins) to the flowers." In a trial, marijuana parthenocarpy was not induced by the application of the spray used on tomatoes.

Only the photoperiod(c) will trigger parthenocarpy in flowering female marijuana plants. marijuana parthenocarpy occurring before the autumnal equinox is considered by the author to be "long-day" and marijuana parthenocarpy occurring after the autumnal equinox to be "short-day". The longest photoperiod that will trigger parthenocarpy in unfertilized flowering homozygous(d) Indica female marijuana plants is 13:00 hours, give or take 15 minutes. This effect can be obtained in the month of August at N35Lat, and because the capitate-stalked glandular trichomes received plenty of UVB during this month at this latitude, the harvested resin spheres had fully realized THC. Rating: euphoria and hallucinations, major appetite boost and pain relief, deep dreamless sleep. These plants seldom grow taller than four feet but potency makes up for the reduced harvest.

The gene pool is heterozygous if a flowering female marijuana plant is not parthenocarpic by the end of the first week in September in the Northern Hemisphere. If this is the case, pollination is used instead of parthenocarpy to trigger the growth of the capitate-stalked glandular trichome before the autumnal equinox to obtain as much fully realized THC as possible in the harvested resin spheres by the time the majority of the seeds are ripe.

The longest photoperiod that will trigger parthenocarpy in unfertilized flowering heterozygous female marijuana plants is 11:00 hours, give or take 15 minutes: This effect can be obtained in the month of November at N35Lat. Because of the low intensity of UVB radiation at this latitude at sea level during November, the harvested resin spheres evidenced only slightly more THC than precursor compounds. Rating: mild to medium euphoria, appetite boost and pain relief, good snooze.

Thai marijuana falls into this 11:00 hour category, and its parthenocarpy is characterized by an inflorescence in which many floral bracts are attached to an elongated meristem. It is these elongated meristems that are harvested to become a THAI STICK. On the other side of the world, Mexican marijuana grown around the same latitudes (Michoacan, Guerrero, Oaxaca) also falls into this short-day parthenocarpic category and the unfertilized marijuana will become "sensimilla" in the 11:00 hour photoperiod which begins in mid-December in that region. The winter sunshine in those latitudes has enough UVB intensity to produce fully realized THC--unlike the winter sunshine at N35Lat.

All unfertilized flowering female marijuana plants will become parthenocarpic in a 9:00 hour photoperiod (15:00 hour dark period): This can be obtained in the month of December at N35Lat. At this latitude in this month there is not even enough UVB in sunlight for precursor vitamin D3 to develop in human skin. The phytochemical process will not produce fully realized THC when UVB falls below a certain level of intensity expressed in µW/cm2. Rating: no effect.

(a)In the Northern Hemisphere above the Tropic of Cancer, the key to all marijuana potency is this: The more days of sunlight the capitate-stalked glandular trichomes' resin spheres accumulate before the autumnal equinox the more fully realized THC.

(b)It is recognized in the indigenous world that drug-type marijuana with a majority of ripe seeds will produce more euphoria, hallucinations, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and sleep aid than with a majority of unripe seeds.

(c)The photoperiodic response is controlled by phytochrome. "Phytochrome is a blue pigment in the leaves and seeds of plants and is found in 2 forms. One form is a blue form(Pfr), which absorbs red light, and the other is a blue-green form(Pr) that absorbs far-red light. Solar energy has 10X more red (660nm) than far-red (730nm) light causing the accumulation of Pfr." The first and last hour of a day's sunlight is mostly red light because of the scattering effect on blue light. "So at the onset of the dark period much of the phytochrome is in the Pfr form. However, Pfr is unstable and returns to phytochrome Pr in the dark." The red light in sunrise returns the Pr to the Pfr form. "Phytochrome Pfr is the active form and controls flowering and germination. It inhibits flowering of short-day plants (the long night period is required for the conversion of Pfr to Pr) and promotes flowering of long day plants."

Kelvin Temperature is an easy key to the efficiency of artificial light to fuel photosynthesis or to affect the phytochrome. The former is fueled very efficiently by 6500K light: this is a Kelvin Temperature the same color as the sky at noon on a clear summer day. Some Mercury Vapor HID bulbs are rated 6500K. Metal Halide HID bulbs are rated 4000K and can be used instead of the mercury vapor with good results. A less expensive alternative to HID lights that will produce the same results on a smaller scale is the GE Daylight ULTRA 40-watt 48" fluorescent tube which is rated 6500K. 160W will deliver the desired effect to eight sq ft (2'x4') if the ballast in the two-lamp holder is a "high power factor" standard size; the smaller, energy-saver ballast provides less luminosity. The fluorescent tubes have to be closer to the plant meristem than the HID bulb. To obtain the desired effect with the fluorescent tubes in an environment that receives no supplemental sunlight, the distance to the plant meristem should not be greater than 2" for seedlings or 6" for transplants in one gallon and larger containers.

Phytochrome, on the other hand, is very responsive to red and orange wavelengths. Because its light is saturated in these wavelengths, the ordinary household incandescent light bulb (2845K) is used as a cheap and effective way either to delay flowering in short-day plants with night-interruption lighting or to establish an artificial light "flowering photoperiod" using 2845K light of appropriate wattage for the square footage at the start and end of the photoperiod to simulate the red wavelength in sunrise and sunset. A 100W light bulb distanced 2' to 4' from the plants will deliver the desired effect to 16 sq ft (4'x4').



As an example: 8' x 8' garden plot divided into quads. The phytochrome of the plants is manipulated by 100 watts of 2845K light dangling over the center of each quad for a total of 400 watts. Photosynthesis for the entire garden plot is fueled by 1000 watts of 6500K Mercury Vapor light or 1000 watts of 4000K Metal Halide light dangling overhead at the center of the garden plot. To use the potent UVB photons in outdoor sunlight during July and August to fuel the phytochemical process that makes THC, a short-day flowering photoperiod for the indoor garden plot could be established on May 1st for potted marijuana plants that were germinated December 1st of the previous year.

FLOWERING PHOTOPERIOD

SUNRISE: One hour phytochrome (2845K light)
DAYTIME: 10:00 hours photosynthesis (6500K/4000K light)
SUNSET: One hour phytochrome (2845K light)
NIGHTTIME: 12 hours dark

PARTHENOCARPIC PHOTOPERIOD

SUNRISE: One hour phytochrome (2845K light)
DAYTIME: 9:00 hours photosynthesis (6500K/4000K light)
SUNSET: One hour phytochrome (2845K light)
NIGHTTIME: 13 hours dark

The change to a parthenocarpic photoperiod is made around the third week in June after the plants have fully flowered; then, beginning July 7 or so, the potted plants are moved outdoors into full sun from 9am until 4pm. Moving the plants from the indoor parthenocarpic photoperiod to outdoor sunlight takes advantage of the energy of the UVB photons during these months and should be continued for at least 30 days. This is the time necessary for the phytochemical process to make fully realized THC in the majority of the resin spheres. Manipulation of the photoperiod could be used to good effect in the South of England, for example, because it is only possible to get a sunburn there during July and August. This follows the author's naked caucasoid sunburn rule that states: If a naked caucasoid can go outside and get a sunburn, there are enough UVB photons of appropriate intensity to make fully realized THC at that time and place.

d)In Nepal and nearby areas of India where the capitate-stalked glandular trichome is triggered into growth by parthenocarpy rather than by fertilized ovum, great care is taken to make sure that all male marijuana plants are destroyed as soon as they reveal their sex. This is because unfertilized Indica flowering females can have both stigma and anther protruding from the floral bract. In the Indica gene pool, female-produced pollen carries an allele for long-day parthenocarpy, and seeds resulting from this female-produced pollen will produce another generation of female plants that will also exhibit long-day parthenocarpy during flowering. But if pollen from male plants is introduced into this gene pool, the resulting seeds will produce a generation of females that will exhibit short-day parthenocarpy instead. The allele for long-day parthenocarpy in the female-produced pollen is carried into the gene pool by self-pollination and cross-pollination, and perhaps homozygous is used too loosely here to describe the genetic result.



( It appears that the resin sphere acts as a magnifying lens.



A NOTE ABOUT marijuana OPTICS FROM THE AUTHOR: Joe Knuc is a pseudonym. If the paragraph or sentence has quotes around it then somebody with a degree wrote it. Otherwise, the author takes credit for it.

First published December 2002 and revised 2003, the author transferred the marijuana OPTICS copyright in May 2003 to D. Craig Steffens, a medical marijuana patient and activist.

marijuana Optics is available in two formats: PDF and HTML. But you'll have to get them from jknuc's Yahoo Briefcase because this free server does not allow downloads. Send this email message and a link to both file types will be sent to you by return email. The PDF file is compressed into a ZIP file. The HTML file is not.

In California, the San Diego city council recently passed guidelines for the cultivation of medical marijuana inside the city limits. Under these guidelines, only indoor cultivation is permitted. In Humboldt county medical marijuana grown outdoors must be beneath a canopy. These restrictions could be part of a ploy to downgrade the effectiveness of medical marijuana by removing the UVB photon from the light stream. In Canada, for example, the marijuana the government is providing to some patients is grown inside a former copper mine under artificial light. Is it any surprise that the patients' who signed up for the government program are dissatisfied with the government product and want their money back?

The "hide" is the toughest part of medical marijuana cultivation. How to get the UVB photon to the capitate-stalked glandular trichome without the police or the neighbors seeing the plants is a problem every medical marijuana grower faces if he or she is hip to the cannabinoid pathway. Shelter Systems sells a translucent woven ripstop film that transmits a percentage of the UVB radiation. On September 22 at N35Lat, the UVB reading at 11:00am of unfiltered sunlight was 300 microwatts/cm2 at a 1400' elevation. At the same time, the UVB reading inside a structure covered with the translucent woven ripstop film was 140 microwatts/cm2. 140 microwatts/cm2 may not seem like much compared to the 300 microwatts/cm2 contained in the unfiltered sunlight, but when you realize that there are zero UVB photons emitted by HID bulbs and zero UVB photons transmitted by corrugated fiberglass or other traditional greenhouse coverings, 140 microwatts/cm2 is quite a lot.

© May 2003 D. Craig Steffens
 
Top