Is it just me, or are some of you getting overly dramatic with this?
From what I understand, it takes more than just a blood test. It also takes cooberating evidence from someone trained to tell if someone is under the influence of drugs.
I also think this is aimed at stopping youth from becoming drug addicts. Am I wrong there?
So how will it work for a vet in a medical state with a card. The Va says it's ok and that its meds . Wonder how that'll play.
I actually formed a company to do the cards but Maine turned me down for this?in maine there trying to have the MJ regisrty tied in with dmv and law enforcement data base..when will they take the card and make me get a tatoo??
In Maine a refusal to submit is an admission of guilt. I should know I got an OUI out of it.They don't want your urine. They want your blood. The officer will say I think you are under the influence of marijuana. He will then take you to the hospital. You will have two choices at this time.
Sign the consent form, or don't.
Option one is sign the consent form. From there they take your blood, give your license back and you have to wait for court. (with license still in hand)
Option 2 is don't sign. They take your license for 1 year (they give it back in 6 months if you sign) the instant you refuse. I would imagine they then get pissy and take you to jail, fondle your balls a little, you know standard procedure.
If you don't have anything on you I would say do not sign the paper. I signed, but only because I knew I would lose my license for 6 months instead of a year.
If you have a lawyer he will probably kiss you for not submitting to their test though.
Is it just me, or are some of you getting overly dramatic with this?
From what I understand, it takes more than just a blood test. It also takes cooberating evidence from someone trained to tell if someone is under the influence of drugs.
I also think this is aimed at stopping youth from becoming drug addicts. Am I wrong there?
Last year my neighbors 10 year old son was riding his bike to the school to play ball with his friends. A fucking meth head came up behind him and hit him, killing him instantly. The police did a field test, and based on him failing it, got a Court Order to draw blood. He tested positive.
Should this guy not have had to give blood? My neighbors still cry and their lives are destroyed.
I have news for people. Not everyone functions normally after 10 bongs of really good weed. I for one tend not to drive seriously stoned because I seem to do a lot of daydreaming. I know this so I don't drive ripped. But if I did, and I decided to zone off for a second, and I hit and killed a kid, do I deserve to be punished? I most certainly feel I should be punished.
I always hear people on here saying weed doesn't affect the way they drive. Maybe I have good bud because I've heard many of my friends say they are to burnt to drive after smoking a few joints at my house....
Where in this report does it say someone can be convicted based on bloood with no accompanying field sobriety test? I apologize if I missed it.
" leave me out of this master plan, i wont piss in a cup for any f#ckin man "
-Cottonmouth Kings-
Obama Drug Policy calls for drugged driving charges for UNIMPAIRED marijuana users
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/russ-belville/obama-drug-policy-calls-f_b_574483.html
From the President's National Drug Policy Report
http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs10/ndcs2010.pdf
HMMM, what happened to the hopey/changey stuff i was promised?!?!!?!?!
Uh oh. I guess Obama Jesus doesn't love us so much after all lol. Looks like he's thinking up ideas to make money off his cattle in his privatized prisons.
Keep Hoping guys. Maybe if we all Hope enough this will all just go away. Hope, Hope, Hope.
I'm going to close my eyes and HOPE now. I HOPE I'm not getting scammed. *clicks heels 3 times "There is no place like home, there is no place like home...."
C'mon guys, wakey, wakey he's just another Fascist in a long line of fascists President's dating back decades. You've been bamboozled. Don't feel bad, it happens.
This just in, Obama doesn't like you. In fact he want's to destroy you. Bush III
Sounds like they are trying to push people away from cannabis and toward heroin, meth, and coke, which are metabolized quickly and don't show up in a test after only a few hours. Makes me feel all warm inside knowing our government is always sending the right message to the children.
I think people are mistaken about the amount of power a president has, in this country anyway. He cannot implement his own personal will, only the will of his handlers who put him in power. That is, unless he WANTS to be shot in the head... Obama is just the front man, the talking head, and the fall guy, just like all the presidents before him for a long time.(except Kennedy, obviously) Obama has no power, just like we dont. It's all an illusion... wake up peeps!!!
Piss poor decision to attempt to expand these ridiculous laws further.
This is all based on the Michigan Supreme Court decision
which states that intoxication is irrelevant.
We are already subject to this in 15 states,including
MMJ states with no exclusions for legal patients.
While I have no intentions of joining the Teabaggers
I am disappointed in this administrations position on this.
btw what is the situation with obama in usa? i remember when he got elected everybody looked at him as the messiah. how has that chenged now? i mean not only for drug laws but in general
FIRSTLY
where is the scientific PROOF that stoned drivers are impaired? i wanna see documented comprehensive studies before we put peeps behind bars for shitsake. fucking witch hunts...
i would make this a matter of contention in the courtroom. without SCIENTIFIC PROOF they have hearsay. period. without going into details, i am CERTAIN that my driving while "high" is as good as it is when i am not. don't ask how i know.
let's establish intoxication parameters besides 'he smoked a month ago and is certainly still impaired!!'
fucking embarrassing to to live in the home of the free, idinit?
Worse yet, they were paid for by the government, and the politicians that initiated them were expecting a result that would confirm their prohibitionist agenda. One study came out with the recommendation that cannabis be decriminalized, while the other recommended outright re-legalization of cannabis. That would be the La Guardia Commission Report, and the Shafer Commission Report. Both reports were, surprise surprise, buried by the politicians. So there really is no need for yet another scientific report -- that work has already been done.
And does anyone today actually believe that cannabis is one of the most dangerous narcotics available, with absolutely no medical value, prone to serious harm to society, and extremely addictive? Because that is what cannabis is classified as, as a Schedule 1 drug.
Here's an bit of irony -- google for USA Patent 6630507. It is a patent for a medical application for cannabis, issued to the USA Federal government itself in 2003. So why is it still a Schedule 1 drug, or better yet, why is it still illegal?
Prohibition 2.0 had nothing to do with cannabis being of great harm to society to begin with. And 73 years later, the same rationale is still being used to justify this war on cannabis, which has nothing to do with scientific fact and everything to do with suppressing citizens' rights and freedoms for the private profits of certain industrial groups.