What am I not referring ti is a better question..
Criminal indictments coming for Trump.
- Thread starter Hammerhead
- Start date
- Status
I'm aware, as I think I've said before, I'm not trying to convince him as much as I'm thinking of the potential of someone coming along and reading his nonsense and believing it because nobody comes back to correct him. I've long ago concluded that Hempy is beyond redemption.
Okay so it is your contention that this is just a step in a deliberative process that when concluded is going to expose the corruption of political elites resulting in them all going to prison barges off the coast of Gitmo? Is that about right?
Tell me where does this rank compared to the prediction that the Durham investigation was going to do pretty much the exact same thing but failed?
Last edited:
Wrong again on each and every account, you can't incriminate yourself if you are truly innocent. You can't accidentally incriminate yourself over a crime you've never committed. As I've stated pleading the 5th can be used against you. It can be in civil cases and while technically it can't be the sole basis for a verdict of guilty it's still going to be in the back of the jury's mind that you're pleading the 5th because you guilty at that point all the prosecution need do is offer enough other evidence to produce reasonable doubt. So you were not completely right, at best you were only half right but you weren't even half right because this was neither a civil or criminal case it was a grand jury investigation.
As for what you thought was me undermining my own point, if the person answers in the negative or just says they don't know but the prosecution has evidence they did no then the person would be lying meaning they did know or were somehow involved in which case they would be making a foolish mistake to say they knew nothing or answer in the negative. In that case the person should plead the 5th so that he can be granted immunity and then if he keeps pleading the 5th he'll go to jail anyway because the courts will not allow you to plead the 5th once immunity is granted. I was only suggesting that a person should answer in the negative or say they don't know if they know they are innocent and/or do not have knowledge. My point is that if they plead the 5th it's because they know there is something that could be used against them.
No everyone else understands me just fine, it only seems illogical and incoherent to you because you're a moron that is incapable of recognizing when you are wrong.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Durham is not done. But, yes. That is something that will likely end up happening as a result of the documents in question, I contend.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Will do! Thanks!
Rise Above! Pious soap boxes! 80’s era green bud profiles……..Sister 17
Too High To Die
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Wish I had me a bag of that stuff!
It's clear many don't care what politicians do as long as they're part of their party or someone they like. I don't give a rat's ass about that BS. If there openly commiting crimes just to hold onto power they are not doing it to help anyone but themselves. Most people use to know this.
Ask yourselves are you happy with the direction the USA is headed. More racism, more crime, More lies. Look what Musk did to tweaker..
www.cbsnews.com
Twitter saw an "immediate, visible and measurable spike" in hate speech after Elon Musk takeover, researchers find.
After months of contention between Elon Musk and Twitter executives over his bid to own the company, the Tesla founder was officially given control on Friday. But as the new leader emerged at the helm, the platform saw a massive spike in hate speech, a new study found.
Researchers from Montclair State University found that the 12 hours immediately following Musk's ascension to ownership saw a much more "hostile" environment on Twitter. The team looked at tweets filled with "vulgar and hostile" rhetoric aimed at people based on their race, religion, ethnicity and orientation, such as the "n-word," "k-word," and "f-word," to find out just how bad it got. And what they found was an "immediate, visible, and measurable spike."
Ask yourselves are you happy with the direction the USA is headed. More racism, more crime, More lies. Look what Musk did to tweaker..
Twitter saw an "immediate, visible and measurable spike" in hate speech after Elon Musk takeover, researchers find
The number of hate speech-filled tweets increased by 4.7 times an hour immediately following Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter, researchers found.
www.cbsnews.com
Twitter saw an "immediate, visible and measurable spike" in hate speech after Elon Musk takeover, researchers find.
After months of contention between Elon Musk and Twitter executives over his bid to own the company, the Tesla founder was officially given control on Friday. But as the new leader emerged at the helm, the platform saw a massive spike in hate speech, a new study found.
Researchers from Montclair State University found that the 12 hours immediately following Musk's ascension to ownership saw a much more "hostile" environment on Twitter. The team looked at tweets filled with "vulgar and hostile" rhetoric aimed at people based on their race, religion, ethnicity and orientation, such as the "n-word," "k-word," and "f-word," to find out just how bad it got. And what they found was an "immediate, visible, and measurable spike."
kids always test the new teacher. esp the really stupid and immature ones...
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
The update to this story is that they were mostly bots (and are being removed).It's clear many don't care what politicians do as long as they're part of their party or someone they like. I don't give a rat's ass about that BS. If there openly commiting crimes just to hold onto power they are not doing it to help anyone but themselves. Most people use to know this.
Ask yourselves are you happy with the direction the USA is headed. More racism, more crime, More lies. Look what Musk did to tweaker..
Twitter saw an "immediate, visible and measurable spike" in hate speech after Elon Musk takeover, researchers find
The number of hate speech-filled tweets increased by 4.7 times an hour immediately following Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter, researchers found.
Twitter saw an "immediate, visible and measurable spike" in hate speech after Elon Musk takeover, researchers find.
After months of contention between Elon Musk and Twitter executives over his bid to own the company, the Tesla founder was officially given control on Friday. But as the new leader emerged at the helm, the platform saw a massive spike in hate speech, a new study found.
Researchers from Montclair State University found that the 12 hours immediately following Musk's ascension to ownership saw a much more "hostile" environment on Twitter. The team looked at tweets filled with "vulgar and hostile" rhetoric aimed at people based on their race, religion, ethnicity and orientation, such as the "n-word," "k-word," and "f-word," to find out just how bad it got. And what they found was an "immediate, visible, and measurable spike."
Sure they are lol. You got an excuse for everything.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Hempy has answers for baseless claims made by the Deep State sympathizers.
moose eater
Well-known member
That Hempy -thinks- he has such answers is indicative of Hempy's Delusions on Parade Show; The Great Awakening thread, and the current Criminal Indictments thread, where we get to witness the mental gymnastics that are operationalized when some (Hempy) engage(s) in blind hero-worship, all the while claiming to possess keen objective insights.
Christ, Hempy, you're a one-person walking retirement fund for any competent shrink working with chronic psychoses.
Mcnoodles imagination creates garbage than posts it without a care it's totally made up. You have never said a single thing that speaks truth to Turd's character or that our political system is broken regardless of whose boot you prefer licking. Neither party will help you live better. They are in it for themselves nothing more.
The investigative part is done, the prosecuting part is done, all Durham has left is to write a report which may or may not be released to the public. Although since that was Barr's intention that it be released to the public. Garland will probably do that as well given that he could have just shut it down but didn't since he saw that all Durham had was a handful of incredibly weak cases each of which he ultimately lost.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Inflation is still high, my 401k is down big this year, many people can't afford housing due to cost and rising rates, crime is getting worse, possible recession coming up, and all democrats seem to be concerned about is what little Jimmy said on Twitter.
Yep I'm definitely voting 100% Republican tomorrow, and will do the same in 2024.
And let's go ahead and get ahead of this: Many key states—thanks to laws enacted by Republican-controlled legislatures—aren’t even allowed to *start* counting mail-in votes until after polls close.
It’s not “suspicious” when those states count mail-in votes last; it’s what they’re legally required to do.
Last edited:
- Status
