Last year I've grown a pack of Rocky Melon feminized seeds, there was 7 seeds, I had 7 healthy seedlings but one of them was a male, it had only male flowers not a single pistil. And I remember the Peyote Purple line from Cannabiogen was feminized but sold as reg because there was sometimes males coming from the seeds.I can't believe that after all the hours so many of us have spent explaining this, that there are still people who think you can get males from female only crosses. Not possible folks. Been over it a hundred times, so many threads, read some stuff, learn, if you have a box of ping pong balls, there aren't any tennis balls in there. Stop telling people you're finding tennis balls when you open a box that only has ping pong balls in it. Either it doesn't or you didn't. Whether you know it or not, you are not being honest.
We aren't talking gender here, woke folks fuck off, this is sex, biological sex, there are rules and your feelings don't change the rules.
Hey OJD, I'm not picking a fight here, I'm just explaining the truth. Cats don't have puppies.I couldn't explain to you how or why it happens, buts it's 100% proven these days with EVERY well known Feminized seed breeder has experience this after making 1000's of Feminized seeds over many years
<This obsession with wokeness is bonker, it has no place in a discussion about cannabis.1. You can't use studies on hemp to prove a cannabis point.
2. You are confusing active Y with X to autosome.
3. Only active Y has males. If you think otherwise, congratulations you're woke.
That is not true, and in the studies that I am attaching, there is no reference to tetraploids... They always talk about diploid lines.Oh and you can't use hemp studies because most of the hemp industry uses tetraploid lines, and we're talking about diploid lines, mainly.
I am not even remotely an expert on the subject, but as far as I can understand, it is one thing to be able to sequence all the bases that make up DNA, and quite another to understand the function of each base pair.Is the DNA from cannabis deciphered at 100% or not ?
If it's not fully decoded there could be some surprises still hidden in those genes.
So because you don't know any of the scientific theories, but are convinced they don't know everything, what I say therefore, when repeating them, must be wrong. But your lack of understanding has lead you to the truth. Brilliant. Let's look at the truth you believe in shall we? We are talking about the genetic inheritance of seeds that have two mothers (including where both are the same plant.) Well that is also called feminised seed. You have a graph up of your beliefs. It's the third one above. Now point me to the f'n males on that graph of your beliefs. Tell me how it says something I haven't.
So the advertisement that 99.9% of females is false, they are 100% female.I'm sorry to be so blunt, but you don't know what you're saying at all.
What you are saying without knowing it is, all cannabis is X to autosome and active Y is irrelevant. I don't need a Y chromosome to have a male, I just need some balls on a plant without pistils and that's male enough for me.
Yeah, that's what I refer to as woke. You don't care what's in the genes, you just wanna label that let's you use it for sex.
A key for future reference:
Qualitative sexual determination = Active Y
Quantitative sexual determination = X to autosome.
What cats have = kittens
What dogs have = puppies
What feminised seed grows = females (some with bollocks).