What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Wuhan Coronavirus is an Offensive Biological Warfare Weapon

NEW ENGLAND

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I was thinking about ordering the UFC tomorrow night , but why bother.
Probably not supposed to post personal identifiers here in open forum,but could we know the combatants weight ?
Preferably in lbs seeing where it's a weed website,although an accurate weight in stones may also be appropriate because some folks have some stones.
LMFAO :biggrin:
 

RudeDog

Well-known member
Veteran
Where does it show proof of natural origin in the sequence?

Answer a question with a question, nice one. I thought you could explain to me where it shows human manipulation like you stated. I presumed you understood what we were looking at.
 

shaggyballs

Active member
Veteran
Answer a question with a question, nice one. I thought you could explain to me where it shows human manipulation like you stated. I presumed you understood what we were looking at.

Dude it was a sarcastic post in reply to the guy that made the original statement.
The original statement was the opposite of mine.

That is all the original poster stated.

My thoughts were just as yours.
I thought the original poster could explain things to show proof there was no manipulation.

Why the double standard, he made the statement we need to accept his word for it.

I made the same statement and I am being called out on it.
Double standard.

Why can we not play ball on a level field?

BTW I ask for the graph to be explained in stoner terms.
No one has been willing to do so.

So I will state again I do not understand the graph.
 

mr.brunch

Well-known member
Veteran
I think the graph just shows that although the 2 viruses are related in the past , one didn’t mutate/evolve into the second.
They shared a common parent, then one line branched off into coronavirus 1 (co-v1) while the other branch became coronavirus 2 (co-v2) ... seperate sibling lines, if you will.

The SARS bit is just shorthand for the name for the illness that both viruses are capable of causing- Severe. Acute. Respiratory. Syndrome.

Bear in mind I am a self proclaimed stoner, with no degree :biggrin:
 

Cheesegez

Well-known member
Answer a question with a question, nice one. I thought you could explain to me where it shows human manipulation like you stated. I presumed you understood what we were looking at.

You can manipulate genes without leaving signatures, that’s the beauty of it . The simple principle is viruses dont cross Species overnight... that’s accelerated Evolution, which doesn’t occur in nature

To anyone skeptical about this virus I urge you to watch the plandemic video , cast your own opinion..

https://plandemicmovie.com/
 

Cheesegez

Well-known member
Best example is Tesla.
He is gone and so is all his work.

Oh Tesla what a legend , they used his death ray to shoot down the Roswell craft...

Really we have Tesla to thank for all the technology we reverse engineered from that craft... oh and yer Phillip corso


They must of mastered element 115 by now and the anti gravitational wave it produces upon its elemental decay ...

What do we know..
 

St. Phatty

Active member
You can manipulate genes without leaving signatures, that’s the beauty of it .


depends on the definition of signature.

it's not like a diamond that has a little laser-etched identifier, or a poodle with an RFID chip.

but a good biologist can use simple logic to methodically rule out "the possibilities". doesn't mean they'll get the Social Security number of the creator(s).

maybe Fauci was vain and when they take a close look at his Covid19 creation they will see a custom DNA sign, "Anthony was here."

attachment.php


why do they always show this thing with the red fuzzball's ?

is that what it looks like under a microscope ?
 

Attachments

  • covid19.jpg
    covid19.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 28

Cheesegez

Well-known member
That's untrue, zoonotic transmission of viruses has happened repeatedly & constantly throughout history.

That is most certainly not accelerated evolution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJLXdsO1GBI

I don't dispute that however , that happens over hundreds even thousands of years not overnight.. the speed of which that virus crossed over to humans is a pretty good indicator of a human manipulation.

it uses the same glycoprotein for viral fusion as HIV, SARs and Ebola , thats not out of chance.. thats identifying a good binding mechanism and using it to your ability.
 

Dropped Cat

Six Gummi Bears and Some Scotch
Veteran
Additional information regarding the virus genesis.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086482/

Again, clearly no indication of genome manipulation.



And on a side note, h.sapiens has common ancestors with great apes, we
are not descendant from apes as we diverged from common ancestry.

Those so-called hominoids, the gibbons, great apes and humans,
emerged and diversified during the Miocene epoch.

The last common ancestor that humans had with great apes lived
about 6 million to 7 million years ago.

Good thread, but it is suggested a mask be worn to filter out the smell of
misinformation and pseudo science.

Be informed, not influenced.
 

Cheesegez

Well-known member
depends on the definition of signature.

it's not like a diamond that has a little laser-etched identifier, or a poodle with an RFID chip.

but a good biologist can use simple logic to methodically rule out "the possibilities". doesn't mean they'll get the Social Security number of the creator(s).

maybe Fauci was vain and when they take a close look at his Covid19 creation they will see a custom DNA sign, "Anthony was here."

View Image

why do they always show this thing with the red fuzzball's ?

is that what it looks like under a microscope ?

Haha , good point. Though i do think the signature is in the name to some extend.. maybe in all that junk dna in our genomes there a signature :biggrin:

the red fuzzball are its protein spikes that allows it to bind and utilise the hosts cellular machinery to replicate , clever little bastards really , and in a weird way very fascinating to study... Pretty picture tho the look hella boring under an SEM.

:tiphat:
 

Cheesegez

Well-known member
Additional information regarding the virus genesis.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086482/


Again, clearly no indication of genome manipulation.

yes with a very interesting quote and no conclusion

"How this virus moved from animal to human populations is yet to be determined"

you cannot see a genetic manipulation , you can see a mutation within the genome comparison but you have no real way of determining if that mutation is natural or induced..
 
G

Guest

And in the news the pathetic San Antonio city council passed a totally mindless resolution that the phrase "chinese virus" is considered hate speech. Are you kidding?? Oh hell we cant use the term "Spanish flue" then anymore it would seem among many more infectious disease names.
 

Chimera

Genetic Resource Management
Veteran
I don't dispute that however , that happens over hundreds even thousands of years not overnight.. the speed of which that virus crossed over to humans is a pretty good indicator of a human manipulation.

You clearly have some understanding of this field.

Can you provide any data whatsover supporting the contention that zoonotic transmission occurs over hundreds or even thousands of years?

Because to me that claim makes no sense whats over.

The probability of a spill-over is directly related to the opportunity for crossover, meaning how often 2 species interact. The more often they interact, the higher the probability there will be a spill-over infection from one species to another.

HIV jumped to humans more probably in the course of the slaughter and preparation of a monkey/chimp for a meal, the most accepted theory is that monkey/chimp blood got into a human cut/abrasion, transferring the virus.

The moment of spillover transmission is near instantaneous, it takes a few seconds if that. It's just that the probability of that event increases the more two species interact with each other.

Saying zoonotic transfer takes hundreds or thousands of years to happen is totally without basis or merit. Would love to see any references that counter that position.
 

shaggyballs

Active member
Veteran
Do you have any comments on this?

If we know for sure, man came from apes, as you allege where is the proof?
We don't know for sure as you allege do we?


You are a scientist right.
Can you really make statements like that without proof?

Try and publish a peer reviewed paper without proof.
You will be the laughing stock of the community.
Would you not?

This is the exact point I was trying to make.
We do not have the missing link.
It does not exist.
This suggests accelerated evolution in a lab.
The virus seem to have made a huge/impossible evolutionary jump to infect humans.

Much like humans....
How can you say this is true for sure without the missing link.
It is pure speculation on your part is it not?
If you say it is not....
Please provide the missing link.
 

Roms

Well-known member
Veteran
[FONT=&quot]
The inept reactions of European governments to Covid-19 were dictated by former advisers to Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush. Contrary to public rhetoric, they make no medical claims. Far from responding to the reality of the epidemic, they aim to transform European societies in order to integrate them into their political and financial project
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]https://www.voltairenet.org/article209808.html[/FONT]
 

Klompen

Active member
And in the news the pathetic San Antonio city council passed a totally mindless resolution that the phrase "chinese virus" is considered hate speech. Are you kidding?? Oh hell we cant use the term "Spanish flue" then anymore it would seem among many more infectious disease names.

Just FYI, the so-called "Spanish Flu" was only called such because of WW1 propaganda. The government initially ignored the pandemic, also because of propaganda reasons. We only still use it now because its what has history.

The virus is definitely from China or very nearby, so in this case the virus most certainly is of Chinese origin. I can't imagine how they could ever enforce that in court.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top