Maybe so. Your point? They do a much better job than any source you’ve posted so far. I know your job is to discredit the media, but you have to be smarter than they are.
It is not my job, they do that so well themselves. My point is that Wikipedia is fake news, the argument is a fallacy to begin with. Typically when people argue over sources like you do here, it all comes down to some genetic fallacy. As for Wikipedia doing a ”much better job than any source you’ve posted” well, they certainly did a better job at calling the Gateway Pundit fake news than any source I ever posted that is true.