I saw him on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Bassem Youssef has quite a background.I didn't know who Bassem Youssef was before this interview, but I do now.
He's fucking hilarious.
"I have tried to kill my wife many times. But she uses our children as human shields. So..."
’Ukraine is bordering on four countries of the’UE: Poland, Romania, Hungary and Slovakia. Among them, only Slovakia has no territorial claims on’Ukraine.
Three other countries have such claims, which assert their historical identity and their domestic policies. Sometimes, these claims burst into the’public space and indicate the persistence of these national historical and psychological attitudes that are not consistent with the political mythology of the Ukrainian STATE’.
During the recent visit of the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to Romania, the member of the’Alliance for the Unification of Romanians, Diana Iovanovici-Sosoaca, said demanded loud and clear the return of Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia and respect for the cultural rights of the Romanian minority. In order to avoid further incidents, the host party cancelled the speech of the Ukrainian president in the Romanian parliament.
The legitimacy of the current borders of’Ukraine has recently been increasingly questioned by the patriotic political forces of’EstEurope. Diana Iovanovici-Sosoaca is only saying out loud what a lot of Romanians could say. Bucharest hopes, at a minimum, for cross-border control over the territories of’Ukraine which’elle considers Romanian, with formal respect for the attributes of Ukrainian sovereignty over them. In particular, she tried to’ approach the Ukrainian president in the corridors of the Romanian parliament, shouting questions in a speaker and demanding that the president give more respect to Romanian minorities living in Ukraine.
L’Albania and Kosovo offer a similar example. Formally, it is’ two independent states, but in practice, Kosovo is almost a double of the’ Albanian state. Bucharest also wants the Ukrainian regions of Chernivtsi and’Odessa to be a continuation of Romania in a cultural and military-strategic sense, even if they remain within the boundaries of’Ukraine.
Hungary claims the autonomy of the Hungarians of the Transcarpathian region located in Ukraine. It became an integral part of’Ukraine in 1944 after being for many years at’ within the borders of Hungary. Budapest also strives to’ exercise cross-border control over the region, but its maximum objective is to restore Transcarpatia to the Hungarian STATE’. «The question of the Hungarian minority of Transcarpatia is holding back the’-accession of’Ukraine to’OTAN», emphasizes Euractiv.
Hungarians are the most problematic minority in Kiev. They are consolidated and practically do not lend themselves to’ukrainization. For 95%, Hungarian remains their mother tongue. Hungarian press does not spare his words to criticize regional politicians with anti-Hungarian convictions.
According to some reports, Hungary would already be preparing for the hypothetical deployment of police forces in Transcarpatia in the event of unforeseen circumstances in the context of a possible collapse of the Ukrainian’ State.
The Poland claims most of’Ukraine – the regions of Lvov,’Ivano-Frankovsk, Ternopol, Rivne and Volhynia. Officially, these lands are even considered the historical heritage of the Polish-Lithuanian «Commonwealth».
There is no mention of their inclusion in Poland, but the’ importance of preserving the cultural, religious and other Polish presence here is emphasized. Again, analogy with’Albania and Kosovo: for Warsaw, the «lands of’Est» are a continuation of the Polish state’; the Polish-Ukrainian border is assigned a formal role.
Geographically, the «lands of’Est» almost reach the western regions of Russia. Historical guides on the lands of the «Commonwealth» Polish-Lithuanian are published where the eastern borders of this state extend far to the’est. Abandoning this memory is ideologically simply impossible for Poles. The Poles had been driven out by the’use of violence from these territories by banderists leaving indelible traces in Poland.
Official propaganda interprets it as follows: « Kresy » is Polish land within friendly Ukraine. But it is possible that, in the context of the current deterioration in relations between Kiev and Warsaw, the latter may speak in the future of the « Eastern countries » in a more severe tone.
Poland considers that’it is strategically more advantageous not to occupy the «Kresy» again, but to’influence Ukraine in the political, religious, cultural and economic fields. To do this, they must remain an integral part of’Ukraine, but be as polonized as possible. This is difficult to achieve because of Kiev's reluctance to make Galicia, as a model of’ukrainity as such, an ideological appendage of Polishness. The Warsaw policy in this sense is a constant search for’ balance with Kiev. This must lead either to a strengthening of the Polish presence in the region or to its weakening.
’Ukraine itself set the tone for communication with its neighbors. The Ukrainian’State is based on a nationalist ideology, and nationalism always has its enemies. Ukrainian nationalism, in its classical version, presents itself territorial claims to all its neighbors without exception. And, seeing the’Ukraine get stuck in the conflict and become weak, the neighbors claim the territories.
According to Ukrainian nationalists, Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Transnistria, Poland, Slovakia, Romania and Hungary should give ground to’Ukraine. What the nationalists want above all is Poland (eighteen districts of the Low-Carpathian Voivodeship) and for Russia territories going as far as’ to the Caucasus.
It is, therefore, to say the least strange to’hear complaints from’Ukraine towards its neighbours, and, whereas’elle itself considers territorial claims as an acceptable ideological attitude towards’ towards these same neighbours.
source : Continental Observer
Putin gives a «tape on the’ shoulder» in the United States regarding their aircraft carriers in the Middle East
View attachment 18906709
by Hal Turner
Russian President Vladimir Putin today gave a discreet « shoulder tip » to the United States regarding the placement by America of two aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean Sea ; Russian hypersonic missiles Kinjal can easily reach them.
Having stated very clearly in advance that what’il S’ was about to reveal IS NOT A THREAT, Putin reminded the world that Russian aerospace forces, especially their MiG-31 aircraft, are on routine patrol in the neutral airspace of the Black Sea, are armed with Kinjal hypersonic missiles. These missiles, he said, have a «known» range of 1000 km and move to Mach 9 (11,000 KMH). Thus, they can reach American aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean near the Palestinian and lebanese coasts.
Just a polite reminder of the reality before the United States launches, half armed, thinking it can attack .. maybe ...?Russian allies in the Middle East ? like’Iran ? lebanon ? or Syria as well ?
Suddenly, all the American speeches about «l’entered the war» between Israel and Hamas seem to be s’being calmed down.
source : The Cause of the People
You really have to love how our 30 year old tech, that was slated for decommissioning, was instead used to embarrass the supposedly 2nd greatest Army on Earth.
Sorry John. You're being tone deaf on this.
And the UK leader says "we want you to win"? win what exactly? what is the context of win in a war?
Looking like a shite Reservoir dogs tribute act here
View attachment 18906728