Unless of course Trump is just making everything up as he goes, believing that his supporters are too stupid to aee it when Trump contradicts himself.
Well I didn't say he didn't have good reason to believe they're that stupid.
Unless of course Trump is just making everything up as he goes, believing that his supporters are too stupid to aee it when Trump contradicts himself.
Well I didn't say he didn't have good reason to believe they're that stupid.
too stupid you say?
See? They can't even properly read english.yeah, the GOP hasn't won a POTUS election popular vote in a LOOOONG time. gonna get their ass waxed like a new car this time around too. i guess when you are staring at political extinction, any port in a storm looks good. their selling their souls for temporary power is about to blow up in their faces however.
u really get an education on this thread... who knew u had to win the popular vote to become president...
Small changes through compromise...nothing is 100% amirite?Nothing changes aye...
Um, is this a trick question? I'm going to go out on a limb here and say 1776. or did you want someone to do the math and say 11 years earlier?The Three-Fifths Compromise was reached among state delegates during the 1787 Constitutional Convention.
When was 1776?
I’m mostly an anarchist so I can relate.
I wish weed was illegal again
Oh yes that does sound like fun. I know i cant wait for the liberals in California to decide who runs the country
good callWe call those audi clusters
Yes, it sure is fun when the majority of the country is who decides rather then a minority that is afraid of its race also being a minority. Plus if liberal agendas are so bad why is it that so many non-liberals enjoy the benefits of them? I mean just as a small example I've known many conservatives that rant and rail about providing the poor with food stamps and then turn around and take advantage of the poor by buying their food stamps at 50 cents on the dollar. With their justification being that if the government is going to give out free stuff to the poor then the conservatives are going to make sure to get their share, even if they have to break the law to do it. So much for the concept or rule of law, fiscally responsible conservatives.Oh yes that does sound like fun. I know i cant wait for the liberals in California to decide who runs the country
trump ain't the president, so if people are breaking the law, why are they not be held to account for their actions??Yes, it sure is fun when the majority of the country is who decides rather then a minority that is afraid of its race also being a minority. Plus if liberal agendas are so bad why is it that so many non-liberals enjoy the benefits of them? I mean just as a small example I've known many conservatives that rant and rail about providing the poor with food stamps and then turn around and take advantage of the poor by buying their food stamps at 50 cents on the dollar. With their justification being that if the government is going to give out free stuff to the poor then the conservatives are going to make sure to get their share, even if they have to break the law to do it. So much for the concept or rule of law, fiscally responsible conservatives.
Oh wait, silly me, I forgot that ever since Trump took over the GOP rule of law and fiscal responsibility went out the window.
George W Bush was fiscally responsible? $1.4 trillion deficit?Yes, it sure is fun when the majority of the country is who decides rather then a minority that is afraid of its race also being a minority. Plus if liberal agendas are so bad why is it that so many non-liberals enjoy the benefits of them? I mean just as a small example I've known many conservatives that rant and rail about providing the poor with food stamps and then turn around and take advantage of the poor by buying their food stamps at 50 cents on the dollar. With their justification being that if the government is going to give out free stuff to the poor then the conservatives are going to make sure to get their share, even if they have to break the law to do it. So much for the concept or rule of law, fiscally responsible conservatives.
Oh wait, silly me, I forgot that ever since Trump took over the GOP rule of law and fiscal responsibility went out the window.
why only go back to bush??? Abraham Lincoln is the President that added the biggest percentage increase to the U.S. National Debt. The level of debt increased from $90.6 million in 1857 to $2.68 billion in 1861, an increase of 2859.4%George W Bush was fiscally responsible? $1.4 trillion deficit?
Because theyre not trump. Thats the reality of it. He will lose in November and they will go on bitching about him and blaming him for all the countrys problems long after hes out of the picture. Its just convenienttrump ain't the president, so if people are breaking the law, why are they not be held to account for their actions??
That's not going to work, teaching history is now derided as "critical race theory" to the troglodytes, therefore it has cooties. No new information can enter, they maxed out in middle school.Fun fact, the electoral college in the US was a result of political tampering from slave-owning states who wanted more voting power to keep their slave owning policies in place...
Nothing changes aye...
Even California only gets 2 senators. Our federal system is built on the representation of 50 states, not 300,000,000+ individuals, hence the electoral college.
Yes, it sure is fun when the majority of the country is who decides rather then a minority that is afraid of its race also being a minority. Plus if liberal agendas are so bad why is it that so many non-liberals enjoy the benefits of them? I mean just as a small example I've known many conservatives that rant and rail about providing the poor with food stamps and then turn around and take advantage of the poor by buying their food stamps at 50 cents on the dollar. With their justification being that if the government is going to give out free stuff to the poor then the conservatives are going to make sure to get their share, even if they have to break the law to do it. So much for the concept or rule of law, fiscally responsible conservatives.
Oh wait, silly me, I forgot that ever since Trump took over the GOP rule of law and fiscal responsibility went out the window.
trump ain't the president, so if people are breaking the law, why are they not be held to account for their actions??
So if criminals support Harris, that makes her bad too?remember that trump supporter that used to post all the time that thought his corner store owning neighbor was super smart because he was buying the food stamps from the needy people in his community for a small fraction of their value? He would then launder them through his shop.
How about that other regular posting trump supporter that proudly paid homeless people to steal him his Natty Ice?
good times