What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Tom Hill Haze

Rgd

Well-known member
Veteran
show me a picture of these broad leaf sativas ,
perhaps your description is poor and they are just a sativa with a fatter-than-normal leaf like i have shown already , ,
hey bro ..these are basically the same thing..
he said broad you said fat..
Mexico has lots of "larger than skinny" leaf sativas ..so does Colombia
and they both have skinny leaf
..this back and forth has gone on long enough?
its called Sativa L


hey Tomster

if you are watching....I know my dough arrived

I know things will workout..




been smoking 2 x two year old madmac ohz s1 plants..

In retrospect I shoulda kept the cuts I made because the weed has grown on me

“pearly" is good weed

the fatter one[not fat] gave me serious
"I can do anything "vibes

[thanks mad Mac]

I await my seeds from Tom so I can do the world and me justice..

" c’est la plan"
 
Last edited:

pinkus

Well-known member
Veteran
I am an old fk

Gimmie what i want in wld and i will turf my top anything

What the best sativas didn’t have was too much sedation

When indicas came around in 1978

I thought i has the gold and dumped my

Mex sativa that flowered at 45 n lat

Two years later i wanted it back

Wonder why ?

Same with colombian weed

First half of 70’s=rocket weed
After
That…why does my head feel foggy

Oh yeh..they changed the recipe

All the best
He he

I am also an old fuck… seems likely you might know my other handles since you mention Rocket weed (though my description was/is Rocket Sled weed. He he).
 

Donald Mallard

el duck
Veteran
hey bro ..these are basically the same thing..
he said broad you said fat..
Mexico has lots of "larger than skinny" leaf sativas ..so does Colombia
and they both have skinny leaf
..this back and forth has gone on long enough?
its called Sativa L
sometimes on here ,
with just conversation , we can be talking about the same thing without knowing ,
and still disagreeing ,
thats where pictures are great , they allow the ability to confirm things ,, so we know we are on the same page ,
i think its likely thats the case with the conversation i was having earlier ,
except old mate doesnt seem to have any pictures to confirm it ,
he just wants to disagree ,
ive had a conversation with him before and he was the same way then too ,
some folks just like to make a deal out of disagreeing, and being right ,
there is no middle ground to be had ,
thats where we got to with the second conversation i had with that chap ,
and i wont be entering into a third one since i have much better things to do ..

the typical thing is when someone makes a statement based on study and experience,
with good explanation and a few pictures to go with it ,
the person disagreeing would do so an also back it up with some study and pictures of their own ,
then we may find that common ground and actually, both learn something, its a friendly way of doing it , since we are all on the same team ,
but some folks like to be separate and for want of a better word ,, be smart asses , without anything to back it up , those folks are to be avoided , they dont know how to have good conversation and share information that can enlighten us all ...
and thats about all i have to say on the matter , for me its closed and ill be crossing that chap off my list of people to engage with ...
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Here's a good read

The influence of leaf size and shape on leaf thermal dynamics: does the theory hold up under natural conditions?

Laboratory studies on artificial leaves suggest that leaf thermal dynamics are strongly influenced by the two-dimensional size and shape of leaves and associated boundary layer thickness.

Hot environments are therefore said to favour selection for small, narrow or dissected leaves


 

Donald Mallard

el duck
Veteran
Here's a good read

The influence of leaf size and shape on leaf thermal dynamics: does the theory hold up under natural conditions?

Laboratory studies on artificial leaves suggest that leaf thermal dynamics are strongly influenced by the two-dimensional size and shape of leaves and associated boundary layer thickness.

Hot environments are therefore said to favour selection for small, narrow or dissected leaves


Thanks for putting that up Hammer,
The nay sayers have no idea about botany as it makes total sense why plants have broad or thin leaf.
Plus I looked back about 10 pages and one of the nay sayers put up a picture of a Colombian grow which was so obviously hybrids and not pure sativa but he doesn't have enough knowledge or experience to see it.
 

ICGA

Active member
dont think so mate ,
Your lilly white skin will burn in 10 minutes flat in that sun i assure you ,
the closer to the equator , the more direct the sun is ,
you cant just make stuff up based on your lack of education and you have a hunch,
stick to something else you are a little more familiar with please ..

pretty sure you will find the leaf in afghani plants is also thicker as well as fatter ,
this will be an adaption to the dry climate , the leaf on thai plants is thinner and skinnier to dissipate heat and to cope with the intense sunlight , the thickness of the leaf is how it copes with the more humid climate ...
Thick like a succulent to distinguish from broad as in wide fingered. I agree they are thicker but IMO that would be an addaption to low humidity. As it would cause there to be more tissue to store water in. Thin leaves help tall plants not get destroyed by wind is another reason that I'm they should have an advantage. Where as short plants with a short season need broad leaves to help grow as fast as possible in the early part of the year. This is also why leaves get thiner later in the season.
 
Last edited:

ICGA

Active member
THH is IBL or ??.. I had thought Tom worked it before it was released but looks like I was way wrong on that.
He just preserved it with open polenation not selection. Because the desirable traits in haze are segregating in a way that makes it difficult to lock down in an IBL. He sed neither he or Sam the skunk man had any luck with stabilizing it. It's just a numbers game, it would take more then just filail breeding to stabilize it, and how would you tell where to start if you haven't grown the original parents. Not impossible but it would take many years and an absurd number of plants.
 

ICGA

Active member
Tom is a park ranger. To him, working something means preserving as much of what is there, for the future. He is against forcing a line to go "his way". So yes it's ibl, it's worked, but preserved as is.
I think technically it can't be called IBL unless it's stable for all desirable traits.
 

Brother Nature

Well-known member
Thin/thick, fat/skinny leaf theory sounds similar to Thompsons Nose rule in anthropology, no reason why the same logic wouldn't apply to other species.


But, that's not what the thread is really about. Has anyone whose received these recent hundy packs started a journal yet? I think everyone who has received should start a journal, that way we can all tell you what's what with your grow... ;)
 

sbeanonnamellow

Well-known member
Think it's humidity that thin leaf blades help dissipate. Fairly straight forward but whatevs
I think it's more than just humidity, though that's a significant factor. Leaf morphology is influenced mostly by light and water availability. In compound leaves, variations of leaflet dimension should take the whole compound leaf into account. Not just the slenderness of it's leaflets. It's said that the anatomy of a leaf has everything to do with achieving the balance between photosynthesis and water loss in the environment in which the plant grows. That includes how night time temperatures relate as well. For example, the same cutting grown in the same daytime conditions but with drastically different night time temps will likely have different leaf morphologies expressing to show the climatic variability and adaptability of a given genome. As Wally mentioned earlier, it depends on the genes too. How long they've had to acclimate to a given region. If the genetics are even capable of providing the variability needed to adapt. Some stuff is just too far gone and selected away from.

It's said that plants in humid tropical climates favor broad leaves as they're able to sacrifice water as a tradeoff for cooling via transpiration. Not broad leaflets but broad leaves. I think it's important to make a distinction of the leaf as a whole system including it's leaflets. Cannabis has such complex leaf structures even the grooves in the petioles are of significance to balancing the aforementioned photosynthesis and water availability. To me, all cannabis is broadleaf. Some have varying degrees of thinness or broadness to their leaflets, but when viewing the leaf as a whole how are they not all broad leaves? Genuinely asking. Much love
 
Last edited:

ICGA

Active member
I think it's more than just humidity, though that's a significant factor. Leaf morphology is influenced mostly by light and water availability. In compound leaves, variations of leaflet dimension should take the whole compound leaf into account. Not just the slenderness of it's leaflets. It's said that the anatomy of a leaf has everything to do with achieving the balance between photosynthesis and water loss in the environment in which the plant grows. That includes how night time temperatures relate as well. For example, the same cutting grown in the same daytime conditions but with drastically different night time temps will likely have different leaf morphologies expressing to show the climatic variability and adaptability of a given genome. As Wally mentioned earlier, it depends on the genes too. How long they've had to acclimate to a given region. If the genetics are even capable of providing the variability needed to adapt. Some stuff is just too far gone and selected away from.

It's said that plants in humid tropical climates favor broad leaves as they're able to sacrifice water as a tradeoff for cooling via transpiration. Not broad leaflets but broad leaves. I think it's important to make a distinction of the leaf as a whole system including it's leaflets. Cannabis has such a complex leaf structures even the grooves in the petioles are of significance to balancing the aforementioned photosynthesis and water availability. To me, all cannabis is broadleaf. Some have varying degrees of thinness or broadness to their leaflets, but when viewing the leaf as a whole how are they not all broad leaves? Genuinely asking. Much love
In cannabis they are generally referring to leaflets not the whole leaf. Tropical cannabis plants have giant fan leaves but in cannabis they always have narrow fingers aka leaflets.
 

windmills

Well-known member
A New Study Overturns A Classic Textbook Theory

Why leaves come in so many different sizes, explained by new study​


A new study overturns a classic textbook theory.

Previously, the textbook theory explained leaf size variability in terms of available water and the risk of overheating. In those places with high rainfall, such as in the tropics, leaves grow larger while small-leaved plants flourish in arid and high altitude environments. However, this explanation does not capture the entire complexity of leaf size variability.

Instead, the authors reported in the journal Science that:
  • daytime temperatures place an upper boundary on leaf size for plants growing in arid environments since optimal transpiration is not possible when water supply is limited;
  • in wet environments, however, its night-time temperatures that constrain leaf growth to achieve effective transpirational cooling;
  • in both wet and warm environments, such as the tropics, there seem to be no thermal constraints. Instead, physical limits likely impose a maximum leaf size.

This neat map put together by the researchers shows that as we move to areas with higher average annual temperatures, average leaf size increases.

1688459361807.png
 
Last edited:

Taima-da

Well-known member
Seeing consistent seasonal variation in morphology, (eg fatter leaflets and more open flowers from winter grows within the same generation of nld varieties), it's a no brainer that varying locales produce somewhat differing phenotypic expression of a given genetic.
 

sbeanonnamellow

Well-known member
I'm under the assumption that leaves are large with long slender distinctly serrated leaflets in the tropics because that's the most efficient way to balance the light and water availability.

The large leaves in total surface area with long slender heavily serrated leaflets in tropical cannabis help provide means to operate at a higher operative temperature than leafs with shorter broader leaflets and more rounded serrations. As a leaf structure lengthens the boundary layer gets thicker and effectively forces the plant to find equilibrium at a higher relative temperature. Great for the tropics. The boundary layer is thinnest at the leafs leading edge so having more distinct serrations and longer thinner multifingered sharply pointed leaves provide the plant with a better system for self regulation in the tropics by increasing it's total leaf edge.

Plants in the tropics have plenty of light and water. They typically grow much larger and with much more branching than plants acclimated to more temperate regions. Another reason for the thinner leaflets could be so they don't block out the lower portions of the plant as they grow to these large sizes. I'd say that's why Wally's plant shows the fatter leaves when it's still a smaller younger plant and as it grows larger with more biomass the morphology starts to change into the thinner leaflets. It could even be to help shed frequent heavy rainfall. Selection is important.

Not all plants are going to be so kind as to perform so well. Having the proper genetics to shine in a given environment is quite important. Much love
 
Last edited:

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
The link I posted above has many references with 132 citings to look through.. There's a lot of supporting data in that link..Scroll to the bottom to find them.

Study reveals a mechanism that plants can use to dissipate excess sunlight as heat. In a new study, Schlau-Cohen and colleagues at MIT, the University of Pavia, and the University of Verona directly observed, for the first time, one of the possible mechanisms that have been proposed for how plants dissipate energy. The researchers used a highly sensitive type of spectroscopy to determine that excess energy is transferred from chlorophyll, the pigment that gives leaves their green color, to other pigments called carotenoids, which can then release the energy as heat.


Here's another one.
 
Last edited:
Top