What's new
  • ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

The Trump Bomber

Status
Not open for further replies.

geneva_sativa

Well-known member
Veteran
I like how you just make up wild conspiracy theories with zero evidence.

It's a bold move... Let's see if it pays off.

ummm,,, you mean sources from lame stream media ?

yeah, probably cant provide you with any of those. . . especially after Las Vegas and the crackdown and algorithm shennagins from youtube and the like

and that same lame-stream media has been lying to people for at least 50 years regarding Cannabis ( and plenty else, like WMD, and boogity-boogity, etc ),,, and knowingly lying to the public. . . surprised there are so many on this site that cant seem to use critical thinking skills. . .


and recognize the media is not our friend

of course the DoD and other Troll Farms dont make it easy. . . but the people know
, bro
 

geneva_sativa

Well-known member
Veteran
any links? i did see his list of previous arrests and convictions, he certainly had been involved in the drug trade. depending on how high up the supply chain he was, it's certainly possible that he was working for some black cia project to make money to pay for the Syrian or Venezuelan regime change operations. we know about Iran Contra, so a Syrian contra wouldn't be surprising. they have to find money some where to do the secret shit they don't even tell congresses direct over sight committees about it. but yeah, any links would be appreciated as i didnt read it anywhere so far. :D

again, Casinos for cleaning - funneing. . .

info is out there, just not quite as easy to locate as it was before the Las Vegas
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
well, if he was connected inside the drug biz it doesn't seem to have gone to his head
with the modest life style he was living in his van
i guess that's the secret, self control
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
well, if he was connected inside the drug biz it doesn't seem to have gone to his head
with the modest life style he was living in his van
i guess that's the secret, self control

lol, he's surely not in that business any more, looked a bit washed up in the pic, don't think he had anything going on now except his pro Trump crusade.

living in a van is terrible for a drug dealer, he will permanently be getting busted....hehe. so far he looks like someone who messed up some where big, or suffered a mental illness that made him unable to keep up rent etc and end up in his truck running around telling people how great things are under Trump, all while sleeping in his frigging truck. this guy should have already been institutionalized , not running around at Trump rallies
 

St. Phatty

Active member
lol, he's surely not in that business any more, looked a bit washed up in the pic, don't think he had anything going on now except his pro Trump crusade.

living in a van is terrible for a drug dealer, he will permanently be getting busted....hehe. so far he looks like someone who messed up some where big, or suffered a mental illness that made him unable to keep up rent etc and end up in his truck running around telling people how great things are under Trump, all while sleeping in his frigging truck. this guy should have already been institutionalized , not running around at Trump rallies

Only difference between him & me is, I own property.

OK well there's a lot of other differences too.

There's obviously no money to pay for quarantining people.

But, by observation, those who are chained to the daily commute, the mortgage, etc. are practically incarcerated anyway. AKA House Arrest.
 

geneva_sativa

Well-known member
Veteran
well, if he was connected inside the drug biz it doesn't seem to have gone to his head
with the modest life style he was living in his van
i guess that's the secret, self control

this got me laughing :biggrin:

but i guess i dont really have any reason to believe any of the official story

I go by track record. . . and the media sure has a history of being full of shit
 

St. Phatty

Active member
this got me laughing :biggrin:

but i guess i dont really have any reason to believe any of the official story

I go by track record. . . and the media sure has a history of being full of shit

How many times will we let a group of people lie to us, before we are smart enough to dismiss all their bullsh.t ?

The American people have been lied to 1000's of times, by the US gov.

About ... almost everything.
 

Zeez

---------------->
ICMag Donor
In the days of Walter Cronkite we got journalism. It was a fairy straight forward presentation of both sides and people were allowed to assess the facts and make up their own minds.

How many times will we let a group of people lie to us, before we are smart enough to dismiss all their bullsh.t ?

The American people have been lied to 1000's of times, by the US gov.

About ... almost everything.
 

White Beard

Active member
Obviously it needs to change at a federal level. The problem is that it was never going to. There was too much money and power wrapped up in continuing to destroy people's lives over it.
Quite correct, it can only change now because the bulk of the populace no longer respect this law, or its enforcement. Maintaining the fiction for another round would not be simply horribly destructive and terribly wasteful; it would increase general disregard of law, disrespect thereof.

As a matter of common sense, cannabis prohibition *must* end, and soon.

“Klompen” said:
So we come to the core of our dilemma as a species in general: psychopaths at the top of societies....
YES....

We seem unable to prevent ourselves from allowing bullies and assholes to run things, especially important things.

We seem to imagine that they are more creative or productive, that we’ll be safer in their hands, that their laser-focus on self-interest will benefit society.

“Klompen” said:
So there is an ebb and flow between tyranny of law and tyranny of lawlessness. In this case the notion of "States Rights" has been a tool of oppression and in turn a tool to fight against oppression. Do we seek to further empower states at the risk that they'll individually do great evil with no power to keep them in check, or do we empower the federal at the same risk? Do we maintain a balance of the two and risk it blossoming into violent conflict? Until we humans can cure our age-old problem; Psychopaths running society from above and below. We need a very serious and conscious effort to address the psychopath problem so we as a species can move forward into the future(or even have a future at all). Until that issue is resolved there'll never be a one-size-fits-all solution to centralizing human power. Any time you concentrate power on any level there will be psychopaths waiting to infiltrate and hijack it. Its really holding us back as a species.
Amid the smoke and mirrors of the tenth amendment, may I say a good word about the *entirely* ignored NINTH amendment?

We tend to run right by it without noticing all the time, but it’s actually important. The 9th amendment says:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
This is crucial, but all we talk about are state and federal. The point of the ninth is that we as citizens have rights that aren’t mentioned otherwise, and by inclusion through recognition, intends to throw the weight of the constitution in support of those rights. Check out “The Anti-Federalist Papers” to get the tone of the discussions that led to the bill of rights.

No unenumerated right has ever gained recognition in the US since then (right to abortion is still on shaky ground), to the best of my knowledge.

Personally, I’m partial to my right to grow, process and consume whatever I like, and to my right not to have assholes imposed on me by a system crafted by assholes....
 

White Beard

Active member
the US is an indirect democracy. a democratic republic. a representative democracy


of course the US isn't a direct democracy lol. we should be when voting for the president though.
We are represented in government, rather than calling for consensus of the citizens for every issue, and we select those representatives by ballot count, as submitted by registered citizens. Those ballots are submitted in elections held according to broad democratic principles.

We call the US a democracy *not* because we’re not a republic, but because the citizens elect their representatives by ballot, and those representatives are answerable to the citizens. Or should be. Many Republican congresspersons today can only be reached by donors of record, not by the citizens they claim to represent.
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
picture.php
 

geneva_sativa

Well-known member
Veteran
wow, youtube is so laughable,,, body cam. . . uploaded yesterday,

how timely


people seen through it, white helmet acting at its worst,

no one believes that controlled opposition
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
What on Planet Telex are you blathering about?!

:dunno:

I admit I had a very hearty party for a wake n bake but I feel like syntax is actually breaking down....

:D
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
The hairs have been split rives.

Spit it out.


It's pretty simple.

The US is a constitutional republic, or if you prefer, a constitutional democratic republic. The "democratic" part is all over the place, however - some portions are direct, some are indirect, and some simply give lip service to the idea. The critical part, however, is "constitutional", which is what keeps the two wolves from deciding what is on the menu.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top