What's new
  • ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

The Trump Bomber

Status
Not open for further replies.

White Beard

Active member
And literally 0 republicans in office did... hmmmmm.
‘Cause there were ZERO republicans at the time. I never investigated the extent of slaveowning among the Whigs, ‘cause they dried up and blew away.

“badfishy1” said:
Not too sure what the problem w being a muh nationalist is. Ironically neither do NPCs.
You repeat yourself....
 

White Beard

Active member
Well, this goon did get ONE thing correct.

CNN *DOES* Suck.
-cap
I hate to agree, but I have to. After a strong opening, they have turned out to be the epitome of least-common-denominator reporting. They have had good people, decent investigators, but they should buy Wolf Blitzer a ticket to wherever Geraldo Rivera is hanging out these days...and they should consider turning the company into a news organization.
 

St. Phatty

Active member
Gotta say I fundamentally disagree with you on this one: IMO the states had neither the right or a compelling interest in passing laws governing cannabis before the federal government took cannabis prohibition under its law-enforcement wing.

This was never a local or state ‘problem’ until the DoJ decided to make it a national issue, so it *can’t* be thrown *back* on the states. Prohibition started at the top. It needs to be ended from the top, for the nation as a whole.

It was a Supra-governmental act. Codes written by TPTB, never voted on.

Like the "higher power" that made sure the Petition about SSRI's was removed from Obama's website once it got up to 50,000 signatures.

There was a petition asking the President to look in detail at the connection between SSRI use, and firearm violence, and mass shooting incidents.

Someone didn't want for that petition to reach 100K signatures.

I have a feeling that someone knows the someones that imposed the Cannabis laws.

That is Fascism, the fusion of government & corporate interests.

So here we are, 3 years after that petition was taken down, 12 months after the violence in Las Vegas.

And the ATF form still asks about drug addiction & Cannabis, but nothing about SSRI use.

So here we are 12 months after Las Vegas, and the medical histories of the mass shooters remain clouded in mystery. Even though all but 1 are dead, and medical privacy laws don't govern the med. records of dead people.
 

White Beard

Active member
i read that a lot about only a few actually owning and profiting from slaves, in the end the other 90% facilitated slavery, they agreed that slaves were property and should be given to their owner if they escape. they also didnt protest the idea, at the time it was considered the norm. so it really doesn't matter much about only 10% owning slaves at the time, the other 90% made it possible for someone to own saves by letting it legally happen.
The entire southern economy was built on slavery from the first: it was brought over from Barbados to Charleston, and Africans slaves were most definitely an essential part of the plan. Consequently, as a slave society from birth, and with the convenience of having the servants color-coded, the entirety of life in the Slaver-dominated South was built on and by slaves, depended on slaves for virtually all work and therefore most economic activity, and by virtue of the eventual “3/5” decision, gained the slave states *extra* representation in Congress.

When the rebellion came, it was a simple matter of “them vs us” for most people, and they went off to war with their friends and relatives, not thinking about slavery at all, but about glory and honor.
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Yes, HIPAA covers the dead.

"The HIPAA Privacy Rule protects the individually identifiable health information about a decedent for 50 years following the date of death of the individual."

https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-profe...nformation-of-deceased-individuals/index.html

If I were to go rives on rives I would point out the law expires after fifty years so that means after fifty years it doesn't apply....

But I would probably do it a condescendingly toned admonishment.
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
If I were to go rives on rives I would point out the law expires after fifty years so that means after fifty years it doesn't apply....

But I would probably do it a condescendingly toned admonishment.


Ummmm.... The law doesn't expire after 50 years, it terms out for a specific decedent. :tiphat:
 

Klompen

Active member
Gotta say I fundamentally disagree with you on this one: IMO the states had neither the right or a compelling interest in passing laws governing cannabis before the federal government took cannabis prohibition under its law-enforcement wing.

This was never a local or state ‘problem’ until the DoJ decided to make it a national issue, so it *can’t* be thrown *back* on the states. Prohibition started at the top. It needs to be ended from the top, for the nation as a whole.

Wipe the slate clean, across the board. Then, if some state(s) want to undertake a law to prohibit cannabis again, they’re certainly allowed to try.

Obviously it needs to change at a federal level. The problem is that it was never going to. There was too much money and power wrapped up in continuing to destroy people's lives over it.

So we come to the core of our dilemma as a species in general: psychopaths at the top of societies put in place rules that are unjust. Psychopaths at the bottom of society create chaos and by extension create the need for the average person to seek protection in the form of law. Those trapped between seek stability, justice, prosperity, and a basic fair chance in life. The problem is, there's always a psychopath on one side or the other trying to take those things away. Sometimes the power of law works to further those ends, and other times it works against them. So there is an ebb and flow between tyranny of law and tyranny of lawlessness. In this case the notion of "States Rights" has been a tool of oppression and in turn a tool to fight against oppression. Do we seek to further empower states at the risk that they'll individually do great evil with no power to keep them in check, or do we empower the federal at the same risk? Do we maintain a balance of the two and risk it blossoming into violent conflict? Until we humans can cure our age-old problem; Psychopaths running society from above and below. We need a very serious and conscious effort to address the psychopath problem so we as a species can move forward into the future(or even have a future at all). Until that issue is resolved there'll never be a one-size-fits-all solution to centralizing human power. Any time you concentrate power on any level there will be psychopaths waiting to infiltrate and hijack it. Its really holding us back as a species.
 

geneva_sativa

Well-known member
Veteran
so back to thread topic

Sayoc seems to have been part of spook - drug smuggling operation...

interesting connections again with Sheriff Israel's dirty south...

also eerily similar to Las Vegas Casino shooter, that was readily swept under the rug
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
so back to thread topic

Sayoc seems to have been part of spook - drug smuggling operation...

interesting connections again with Sheriff Israel's dirty south...

also eerily similar to Las Vegas Casino shooter, that was readily swept under the rug

drug smuggling, sounds interesting - any more details?
i'll repeat the 1 thing that the guy seemed to have taste for, steroids
he did have the look
 

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
so back to thread topic

Sayoc seems to have been part of spook - drug smuggling operation...

interesting connections again with Sheriff Israel's dirty south...

also eerily similar to Las Vegas Casino shooter, that was readily swept under the rug

That's a trip. Where did you read that?

I am assuming you are talking about the coward of Broward county. Such a scumbag, their is blood on many hands in the leadership of Broward county.
 

beta

Active member
Veteran
so back to thread topic

Sayoc seems to have been part of spook - drug smuggling operation...

interesting connections again with Sheriff Israel's dirty south...

also eerily similar to Las Vegas Casino shooter, that was readily swept under the rug

I like how you just make up wild conspiracy theories with zero evidence.

It's a bold move... Let's see if it pays off.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
so back to thread topic

Sayoc seems to have been part of spook - drug smuggling operation...

interesting connections again with Sheriff Israel's dirty south...

also eerily similar to Las Vegas Casino shooter, that was readily swept under the rug

any links? i did see his list of previous arrests and convictions, he certainly had been involved in the drug trade. depending on how high up the supply chain he was, it's certainly possible that he was working for some black cia project to make money to pay for the Syrian or Venezuelan regime change operations. we know about Iran Contra, so a Syrian contra wouldn't be surprising. they have to find money some where to do the secret shit they don't even tell congresses direct over sight committees about it. but yeah, any links would be appreciated as i didnt read it anywhere so far. :D
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
The Norway nationalist Anders Behring Breivik’s advice was to look good when you're killed or arrested and leave lots of good photos of yourself around for the cops to find.

Sayoc looks like he's wearing makeup.

I wonder if he had more than one hero...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top