Sounds like fucking bullshit:
...like holding Hitler as an expert in Judaism
That's because he is one of the best showman of our time . He constantly tells people how to think . You better believe it
Saul Alinsky”s Doctrine: 8 steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state
BY IWB · OCTOBER 16, 2015
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor
Ringing any bells?
Compare the education levels of trump supporting states to blue states and you'll see.
https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/us-state-map-education-level/
View Image
I've met quite a few educated people and they are dumd as shit when it comes to real problems. Education means nothing if they have never worked a day In their lives and sponged off their parents or student loans for their education.
People with college education make more money than people without a degree. If more people in the country have degrees the country does better.
It's just that simple.
People with college education make more money than people without a degree. If more people in the country have degrees the country does better.
It's just that simple.
Sounds like fucking bullshit:
...like holding Hitler as an expert in Judaism
...like viewing Andy Jackson as a native-American rights scholar
...like calling Ted Bundy a feminist
...like citing phrenology as proof of African racial inferiority
I’ve READ Alinsky: in fact, when this shitlist started going around, I dug out my old copy and read it again to be certain I remembered correctly, and I found out that I DO remember it correctly. Your ‘version’ isn’t ‘spin’, it’s not ‘opinion’, it’s not even an ignorant paraphrase.
It literally does not say OR IMPLY *ANY* of those things in your text-turd
It’s a weaponized fake, and YOU. CAN’T. TELL.
I hope that makes you feel vulnerable as fuck, because you and your circle-jerk believe a lot more bullshit than that, and a lot of it is even more fake than that - and all that bullshit is dangerous. To YOU, and to ALL OF US.
You SHOULD feel vulnerable, you SHOULD feel scared, because you bought every lie that’s strolled by and winked. You’re a pack of fools, and you’d better get wise before it’s too fucking late
Enjoy your guns and your vote and your 420 while you have ‘em, suckers, because you’ve packed the government with the gang that has been trying to take them ALL ALONG.
I disagree with this. The country does better economically, doesn't mean the people do better. The graduating student owing six figures to the government is in no way better for the student, but it makes the government look a lot more profitable, just like a large corporate hiring contract employees so it doens't have to pay benefits or holidays is more profitable on the books. Sure it looks better, but does it actually create a better company? I work with a lot of people who have PhD's, the large majority of these people have trouble doing basic tasks on their computers, the most necessary of all tools in the workforce today. Higher education doesn't mean higher intelligence, it simply means you can play the game better. It's almost Pavlovian, the more letters you 'earn' after or before your name, the more 'treats' society rewards you with. You're right though, it is very simple.
i'm afraid that there are plenty of folks with degrees holding down jobs that involve a whole lot of "you want fries with this, ma'am ?..."
THIS is factual...and you should be ashamed for not even wondering about any of it
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Polit...and-why-is-Newt-Gingrich-so-obsessed-with-him
"FreedomWorks, the tea party group headed by former Republican House leader Dick Armey, gives copies of “Rules for Radicals” to its leaders. “His tactics when it comes to grass-roots organizing are incredibly effective,” FreedomWorks spokesman Adam Brandon told The Wall Street Journal. Tea partyers aggressively confronting lawmakers at town hall meetings is straight from Alinsky’s playbook."
Saul Alinsky”s Doctrine: 8 steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state
BY IWB · OCTOBER 16, 2015
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor
Ringing any bells?
I don't know Zeez, I salivate when money is held in front of me, as I believe do the majority of people. I also understand to get that treat that makes me salivate I have to play their game, e.g. hear their bell ringing. Humans can learn to ring the bell themselves though, so I guess that's where it differs. I wasn't trying to attack either, but I found your statement pretty broad and basic, so thanks for expanding on it.
My point was what is 'better'? The country I live in has a higher average IQ and higher average happiness than the US, but are we doing better economically, no. Higher incomes can also lead to more class disparity, I don't see that as a good thing, regardless of what color you rep. Just because the Bay area is better off than Flint Michigan economically and at the intelligence level, deosn't mean you or I can afford to live there or would want to. Neo-liberalism isn't the left as much as neo-conservativism isn't the right.