No I am not I took out the valid part because that is not what I meant. I must have done that when you were typing.
My argument is against courts making laws. I am not ducking anything.
-
ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
The 2020 Presidential Election
- Thread starter Zeez
- Start date
- Status
No I am not I took out the valid part because that is not what I meant. I must have done that when you were typing.
My argument is against courts making laws. I am not ducking anything.
The Supreme court sets precedents, which is what other courts look to when deciding how to try cases.
While technically not writing laws. What they do has the same effect in many cases.
While technically not writing laws. What they do has the same effect in many cases.
They interpret what is written. They don’t do any of the writing.
Please enlighten me, you are obviously the first constitutional scholar I seek for serious nonpartisan constitutional opinions on the founders intent.
Abortion, and gay marriage come to mind.
Please enlighten me, you are obviously the first constitutional scholar I seek for serious nonpartisan constitutional opinions on the founders intent.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/9/17/20868790/republicans-lose-popular-vote-win-electoral-college
I gave a example they overlooked it.
Both of which are none of anyone's business except for the people involved.
White Beard
Active member
Stick a cork in it, delusion boy: standing on a pile of shit doesn’t make you tall. Your regime is busy pumping the courts 24/7, HOPING one of those “law abiding judges” will stuff the law and rule in his favor.
The feudalists are / have been cock-blocking Dem appointments for decades and hyper-stuffing the judiciary TO GET AROUND LAWS THEY DON’T LIKE, but sure, I guess with the right Y up your X you’ll believe anything. At least going by your example...
Just keep it in your effing *pants*, OK?
Haha I don't want either side using the court to get their agenda passed. I want the courts to enforce the law.
And once again you show just how dumb you really are.
White beard the most intellectually challenged poster here.
I thought for sure that was packer.
Absolem
Active member
You should understand how the courts work first before thinking what they should do.
It's not surprising you never post links to back up the bullshit you post
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx
"The complex role of the Supreme Court in this system derives from its authority to invalidate legislation or executive actions which, in the Court’s considered judgment, conflict with the Constitution. This power of "judicial review" has given the Court a crucial responsibility in assuring individual rights, as well as in maintaining a "living Constitution" whose broad provisions are continually applied to complicated new situations.
While the function of judicial review is not explicitly provided in the Constitution, it had been anticipated before the adoption of that document. Prior to 1789, state courts had already overturned legislative acts which conflicted with state constitutions. Moreover, many of the Founding Fathers expected the Supreme Court to assume this role in regard to the Constitution; Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, for example, had underlined the importance of judicial review in the Federalist Papers, which urged adoption of the Constitution."
I did post a back up you are just to slow to find it. And what you put in dark is exactly what I have been posting. You are just not smart enough to understand what was said to you.
Like I said intellectual midgets here.
Absolem
Active member
You have posted no links to back up your claim for SCOTUS. Wiki doesn't count.
I'm guessing your education came from the golden EIB microphone.
White Beard
Active member
We’re down to the delusional boilerplate now:
It’s why they never question, never wonder, never check up on *their* ‘side’, no matter how they micro-define it. They’re ”right”: right in ways that - for them - transcend all the principles they claim to stand for, all the laws, all the courts...
As for Pack, he seems to be all about sticking things in others’ mouths. I wonder at some of the things he sticks in his own...judging by what comes out thru his fingers
it is the very dreaded ”judicial activism” that they cannot abide in any democrat, but which they cannot get enough of from their fellow real-american Trumpists.
I know you don’t mind lying, but why do you tell stupid, obvious lies? Is it just hard to care about keeping up the screech anymore?
Maybe you should find yourself a sleepy little hollow and have a nap
I thought you were quite a bit brighter when I saw your grows. You are by all means better at wiring led lights than me. But your political posts and opinions tend to overshadow that in negative way.
Most of us. As in more than half of all voters. Actually do not agree with you.
- Status
