They should have good healthy care to get the help they need to learn how to live being an addict. There always gonna be an addict.
Some humans can't agree that some should go hungry so that others may have so much that they throw it away.
Some of us believe that compassion is inherently part of being human.
A billionaire could feed many without going hungry.
Liberals think hungry and sick doesn't look as good as healthy and happy in anyone's eyes.
That's not weird.
You're just a dick.
I believe in treatment over incarceration, but either way, absolutely I believe we should feed hungry citizens.
I don't believe in dehumanizing anyone, especially just to deprive them of basic necessities with less guilt.
They should have good healthy care to get the help they need to learn how to live being an addict. There always gonna be an addict.
I believe if a drug addict can score money to feed their habit they can also most likely feed themselves. Even in Chicago drugs are not cheap. They should not be our problem.
I know many people who were on drugs and hit rock bottom living on the street who now have their life together, enabling addicts will not help them.
Part Deux. Parnas lets the cat out of the bag.
Surprised it's been ignored here.
Maybe it's safer to hear the rehashed spin version in the morning.
So all the senators but one where swore in for the fake impeachment.
So let me get this straight. Trump is suppose to have tried to affect the next presidential election by with holding aid to the Ukrainians. If he is accused of trying to affect the next presidential election then why are the senators that are running for the dems in the presidential election not stepping back from this fake impeachment?
Can any of you liberals tell me that?
Let's hear it I can't find anything new on msnbc or cnn. NYT or WaPo maybe?
Let's hear it I can't find anything new on msnbc or cnn. NYT or WaPo maybe?
Stick to Fox and Friends Ichabod.... we wouldn't want your head to explode.
So all the senators but one where swore in for the fake impeachment.
So let me get this straight. Trump is suppose to have tried to affect the next presidential election by with holding aid to the Ukrainians. If he is accused of trying to affect the next presidential election then why are the senators that are running for the dems in the presidential election not stepping back from this fake impeachment?
Can any of you liberals tell me that?
Let them have there shitshow. They don't have any confidence in the case otherwise they would not have publicly talked about impeaching him over and over again.
This all so lawfare can argue in court that they need the 6e material (grand jury testimony) from the Mueller sham. They will leak and slander with their media allies right up to the election and then use the material to start impeachment all over again if he gets reelected.
The removal of Trump is a well thought out long term plan and we are only in the middle innings. The single best source of info on the Mueller sham, Impeachment and the democrats/lawfare strategies is.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/
Sundance's depth of knowledge puts him way ahead of the curve on all of this since the beginning. His information is well sourced and has been rock solid.
The Ukraine stuff is about covering up the Obama administrations crimes.
After corn pop Joe threatened to withhold the aid until the prosecutor was fired and they put in a guy that corn pop endorsed publicly. Joe's new Ukrainian prosecutor uncovered evidence of money laundering and theft by corn pop jr.
Once they start looking under rocks in Ukraine out scurries Pelosi's kid, Kerry's kid, Romney's offspring.
Why would anyone have a problem giving taxpayer money to a corrupt country funneling back millions to corrupt US politician's spawn?