Just realizing that because of this thread, i went down a wormhole of cockroach and beetle composting last night.
Mmmm sounds laborious. What, no pics?
Just realizing that because of this thread, i went down a wormhole of cockroach and beetle composting last night.
it aint valued by me. flat to the light sucking up every photon possible is what i want
i say it cause i fucking mean it. fishermen recognize fishermen and i aint feeling it
From the dude that says nobody does scientific studies we now find out a smile is your science...not metrics. And you wonder why we go our own way. When you avoided my tissue K in limes vs avocados it confirmed what I already thought.
Bickering aside, I'm still on the fence about neutral soils being better than those in the 6.4-6.8 range. I've seen both good and bad responses from gypsum applications in this scenario. The best personal experience with gypsum was in an overloaded soil (7.2pH, 65% Ca, 16%Mg, 16%K) the season after the application. pH came down to 7 (I get a lot of rain in the winter also) and the cations were in better ranges, lower K/higher Ca. Even though the yield increased there was still insect pressure.
In more acidic soils (6.8) I've grown veggies and cannabis that yielded really well and were not receiving insect pressure. I think there is a sweet spot and it has as much to do with pH as it does with adequate cations.
What I'll do, and all of you on this site can hold me to it, is find an acid clay with low levels of all minerals and bring the K up to 5%, Mg up to 10%, then do maybe 4 treatments with calcium at 55%, 65%, 75%, and 85%. I don't ave the space or the plant count to do very many but I will shot for 5 of each. I'll do several runs with this soil and document it. I'll get to it in mid Feb. when I'm done traveling for the year.
I have seen the metrics used by SlowNickel. We have a pretty good data base going now. That mixed with the tissue and sap samples ready to be studied next year, I think we are going to have a great base to study from. All this back and forth is great, however data is what is going to push us to the next level.
I have a lab that is doing tissue testing for cannabis that I will be using next year. I hope the sap labs will be ready to roll in the states as well.
BTW - If anybody has sad looking plants, you are way off right? I am trying to find the next level of plant health, not just healthy looking plants. Crop Health Labs says it takes 6 weeks for plant deficiencies to show up visually. Before a healthy plant looses that healthy plant look. Next year, I will be concentrating on those first 6 weeks, and making sure nothing falls out of health. Doing this with brix meters, soil tests, tissue test and hopefully sap analysis. In a perfect world of course.