What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Slownickel lounge, pull up a chair. CEC interpretation

Status
Not open for further replies.

jidoka

Active member
From the dude that says nobody does scientific studies we now find out a smile is your science...not metrics. And you wonder why we go our own way. When you avoided my tissue K in limes vs avocados it confirmed what I already thought.
 

plantingplants

Active member
jidoka, why did you ask that? what does it mean?

slow, it sounds like you are messing around with these fellas but really tho-- how do you know they like your brew?? i am sure after however many years of farming you said you had under your belt you must be pretty sensitive to visual clues plants give. a lot of cannabis growers talk about their plants praying- the fan leaves position themselves upwards. i always wondered why that is valued, what it could mean, and why they truly do that. they do seem healthy when they pray but i"m just guessing when it comes down to it.
 

jidoka

Active member
it aint valued by me. flat to the light sucking up every photon possible is what i want

i say it cause i fucking mean it. fishermen recognize fishermen and i aint feeling it
 

plantingplants

Active member
See that makes more sense. Why would they reduce the surface area exposed to the sun? Maybe praying is a way to reduce transpiration?
 

slownickel

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
it aint valued by me. flat to the light sucking up every photon possible is what i want

i say it cause i fucking mean it. fishermen recognize fishermen and i aint feeling it

Fisherman recognize fisherman cause they smell like fish. Some riper than others.
 

slownickel

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
From the dude that says nobody does scientific studies we now find out a smile is your science...not metrics. And you wonder why we go our own way. When you avoided my tissue K in limes vs avocados it confirmed what I already thought.

To be honest with you, I forgot all about your question regarding the limes and avo, been a busy week.

You think I give a dang about why you two go out of your way? You flatter yourself. I have nothing to prove to you or anyone.

I am here trying to help folk get on the right path. Anyone that ventured down the path appreciated the results.

I am pretty sure any GOOD grower in touch with his grow knows the difference between a sad plant and a happy plant. No?
 

orechron

Member
Bickering aside, I'm still on the fence about neutral soils being better than those in the 6.4-6.8 range. I've seen both good and bad responses from gypsum applications in this scenario. The best personal experience with gypsum was in an overloaded soil (7.2pH, 65% Ca, 16%Mg, 16%K) the season after the application. pH came down to 7 (I get a lot of rain in the winter also) and the cations were in better ranges, lower K/higher Ca. Even though the yield increased there was still insect pressure.

In more acidic soils (6.8) I've grown veggies and cannabis that yielded really well and were not receiving insect pressure. I think there is a sweet spot and it has as much to do with pH as it does with adequate cations.

What I'll do, and all of you on this site can hold me to it, is find an acid clay with low levels of all minerals and bring the K up to 5%, Mg up to 10%, then do maybe 4 treatments with calcium at 55%, 65%, 75%, and 85%. I don't ave the space or the plant count to do very many but I will shot for 5 of each. I'll do several runs with this soil and document it. I'll get to it in mid Feb. when I'm done traveling for the year.
 

HazyBulldog

Member
I have seen the metrics used by SlowNickel. We have a pretty good data base going now. That mixed with the tissue and sap samples ready to be studied next year, I think we are going to have a great base to study from. All this back and forth is great, however data is what is going to push us to the next level.

I have a lab that is doing tissue testing for cannabis that I will be using next year. I hope the sap labs will be ready to roll in the states as well.

BTW - If anybody has sad looking plants, you are way off right? I am trying to find the next level of plant health, not just healthy looking plants. Crop Health Labs says it takes 6 weeks for plant deficiencies to show up visually. Before a healthy plant looses that healthy plant look. Next year, I will be concentrating on those first 6 weeks, and making sure nothing falls out of health. Doing this with brix meters, soil tests, tissue test and hopefully sap analysis. In a perfect world of course.
 

slownickel

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Bickering aside, I'm still on the fence about neutral soils being better than those in the 6.4-6.8 range. I've seen both good and bad responses from gypsum applications in this scenario. The best personal experience with gypsum was in an overloaded soil (7.2pH, 65% Ca, 16%Mg, 16%K) the season after the application. pH came down to 7 (I get a lot of rain in the winter also) and the cations were in better ranges, lower K/higher Ca. Even though the yield increased there was still insect pressure.

In more acidic soils (6.8) I've grown veggies and cannabis that yielded really well and were not receiving insect pressure. I think there is a sweet spot and it has as much to do with pH as it does with adequate cations.

What I'll do, and all of you on this site can hold me to it, is find an acid clay with low levels of all minerals and bring the K up to 5%, Mg up to 10%, then do maybe 4 treatments with calcium at 55%, 65%, 75%, and 85%. I don't ave the space or the plant count to do very many but I will shot for 5 of each. I'll do several runs with this soil and document it. I'll get to it in mid Feb. when I'm done traveling for the year.

Orch,

Excellent trial.

One observation though. Did you use lime or gypsum to adjust your soil to that pH? I have NEVER seen gypsum raise pH. Please elaborate on your "bad"experience with gypsum. Sure seems like you had some high K and Mg as well as a high pH. Sounds like dolomite.... High Mg is a bitch to get rid of. And as you can see from your own numbers at 65% Ca, there wasn't enough.

Sounds like you are discussing two different scenarios.
 

slownickel

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I have seen the metrics used by SlowNickel. We have a pretty good data base going now. That mixed with the tissue and sap samples ready to be studied next year, I think we are going to have a great base to study from. All this back and forth is great, however data is what is going to push us to the next level.

I have a lab that is doing tissue testing for cannabis that I will be using next year. I hope the sap labs will be ready to roll in the states as well.

BTW - If anybody has sad looking plants, you are way off right? I am trying to find the next level of plant health, not just healthy looking plants. Crop Health Labs says it takes 6 weeks for plant deficiencies to show up visually. Before a healthy plant looses that healthy plant look. Next year, I will be concentrating on those first 6 weeks, and making sure nothing falls out of health. Doing this with brix meters, soil tests, tissue test and hopefully sap analysis. In a perfect world of course.

The crowd wants blood. They want a measuring stick that goes beyond weight and quality. We need to look for a correlation between brix and the objectives on young petiole growth.

The problem with the refractometer is that it will measure sugars that are incomplete.
 

HazyBulldog

Member
When studying up on Crop Health Labs paradigm. They say no meter is valuable by itself. They all started with meters, but they saw the inconsistencies in them when they started doing sap analysis. Personally I believe the only metric that will be accurate is sap analysis, and as far as I know, nobody is doing this yet. Didn't Milky have problems with his K meter? Brix varies from day to day, sunny days to cloudy days, ext ext. Only hard data will be from the sap, IMO.
 
Of course nova crop control is the best way, no access to that unless I move to holland and I don't like the cold. I already detest the 3 months it's cold here. No way I could suffer 6-8 cold months.

The Horiba meters aren't perfect but you can make a run chart that is specific to what you're doing so you can actually map data with them that's worth more to me than a happy plant or sad plant reading. You can watch plant response on the meters, if you haven't done it don't knock it.

You can spray Mo and watch NO3 in the sap fall. You can do AlBion Ca and watch sap ca shoot up in new growth. You can watch K go up too after spraying PHT K.

Using the meters you can dial in how much to spray to get the results you're after and then check to see if you got there.

Tissue is 2 weeks behind the sap on average

Your point that readings vary is valid. That's why samples need to be taken at the same time of day from the same relative part of the plant every time and the weather data also needs to be noted.

Run charts are powerful.

I'll leave y'all to your happy vs sad and I'll take my data based decision making
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top