RE the bulbs I mentioned in post #901. These are rated at 100w equivalent but they seem far brighter to me... to MY eyes they look more like 200w. They're a bit painful to look at even with the diffusing globes still attached. Their rated power consumption is 15w and actual tested is 15.6w. I have no way to test lumens. My observations are purely subjective.
I managed to collect all of mine from Menards. They are all 75 watt equivalent and I picked them up for like $3ish a bulb. Started with two rows of 5, and expanded with an additional 4 a few weeks later. I had grown with a 150 HPS + 75 MH + ~100watt CFL for a couple years and these 14 LEDs are kicking that setups ass. I couldn't believe it at first and now I am just stoked!
It's not burning, it's something else related to those LEDs, because I have seen it also on Terpenes plants... )
^^^ I tested mine at an ambient temperature of about 70 F and left the bulbs on a full minute after the current usage stabilized, which only took a few seconds. It never fluctuated more than 1/10 watt. After about 10 seconds the current consumption didn't change. I'm not sure if that fluctuation is a function of the bulb or the wattage monitor I used.
You intended to say LEDs pull less 'current' as temperature rises? I didn't know LEDs behaved that way. I know fluorescent lamps have a higher initial current draw.
Taking a datasheet from any random LED
http://www.samsung.com/global/busin...products/201611/Data_Sheet_LH351D_Rev.1.0.pdf
Page 15.
The samsung diode pulls 2.95 volt (with 1.05A) when the junction temp is 25 degrees celcius.
With the junction temp at 90 degrees it pulls 2.9 volt.
Though it's a rather small change.
Maybe it's just the driver that initially pulls a bit more before stabilizing like with CFLs.