i don't have disagreement with this thought per se
but it may reflect a grass is greener on the other side of the cultural fence
if you read some of the history of buddhism, wars were fought with great enthusiasm
carnage enough to satisfy jack the ripper
now is the more recent vintage a more peaceful religion? maybe
or maybe we're all getting a little more peaceful
evolution selects the fittest, and the violent do seem to winnow themselves out of the equation
I have been posting perceptions from both science and various dogmas to illustrate the causation of belief.
I have yet to ask why someone believes in what they believe or judge them based on it.
I simply ask people to provide evidence it is the belief system and not the believer that is faulty in these cases.
Where is the evidence that it is the belief system and not the believer that is faulty?
I think that if you are to judge a concept on its influence on history alone you need to bring in its positive influence as well.
Combine the influence of evolution as you mentioned and understand that belief evolves within us during our individual lifetimes as well as over the course of generations.
Interestingly enough within buddhist and dogmatic texts is the observation that the concepts themselves will not take place without the abstract of time which implies that we need to evolve in order to properly practice them, which is in process.
But as far as judging a belief based on its negative effect on humanity, how many deaths were caused by scientific creations?
What weaponry in the past few centuries wasn't a result of the scientific process?
Is it science (belief) that makes us evil or is evil and good expressed by us as a matter of choice regardless of what be believe in (science, religion, anarchy, etc)
Nope..you have not asked the whys or whats..but you are pushing those buttons...like a little legal loop hole. don't play innocent.
for sure...you can flip these pages..and read people's whys and whats....and I think you know..
your answers. both are faulty because beliefs are man made concepts.
what do you need evidence for?...an argument? is that what these people are doing?..trying to supply you evidence...or arguing their opinions?
the thread is full of religion bashing and religion promoting...with a bit of YouTube/science thrown in for appearances. that's how it reads to me.
I'm trying to understand your fascination. I'm assuming it's of personal relevance to you.
Ok prove there was a Jesus and or a GOD where is the proof
I get the feeling that your rejecting/fighting against god is your way of being a supreme being(supremacy/domination)/being god
Now in your world, calling someone "idiotic" makes me "hostile". However, in my view, it's just my way of telling the truth.
I'm trying to understand your fascination. I'm assuming it's of personal relevance to you.
false advocate
"we will lead every revolution against us" - zionist theodor herzl
cosmology, bloody simple really. doesn't need a whole lot of words.
It is not our thoughts that define us it is our actions that do.
What a person believes in is not what defines them but the actions born of that belief.
"Belief" is code for superstition. Not based in reality.
If you want to judge religions
while ignoring the extermination of countless millions who don't accept their "beliefs" (actions born of those "beliefs"), then I maintain that you are being disingenuous.
People, now, and throughout history, are/have been slaughtering one another over their superstitions, or "beliefs", as you prefer to call them. Since you already played the "race card", I maintain that religion is a type of racism. "My god's better than your god", and if you don't agree, I will slaughter you.
Look at the world today, and tell me there is not a war between religions. Islam is at war with Christianity and Judaism. They are exterminating Christians, and want to annihilate Judaism. They are at war with anyone who doesn't accept their imaginary deity. This is insanity on a massive scale. The war of the womb is real. It is Islam's intent to take over and dominate the world, and to exterminate the "infidels". And where do they get this idea? From an illiterate murderer and pedophile who they claim to be their prophet.
Do you not see the insanity in all of this?
Suicide bombings, beheadings, burning people alive, subjugating females, promoting sharia law....all these things are a part of their barbaric belief system, their war.
Please don't act as if these things are in some way sane or justifiable.]
Hence: anti-theism, or, "I don't want to believe, I want to know".
It is not our thoughts that define us it is our actions that do.
What a person believes in is not what defines them but the actions born of that belief.
I believe that every perspective contains both relative (personal) and ultimate (universal) truth in regards to humanity and I also believe there is no practical value to judgement.
The bias against religious belief here is intellectually as limiting as racism.
People aren't even atheist but anti religious
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antireligion
Antireligion is opposition to religion. Antireligion is distinct from atheism (the absence of a belief in deities) and antitheism (an opposition to belief in deities), although antireligionists may be atheists or antitheists. The term may be used to describe opposition to organized religion, or to describe a broader opposition to any form of belief in the supernatural or the divine.
false advocate
"we will lead every revolution against us" - zionist theodor herzl
cosmology, bloody simple really. doesn't need a whole lot of words.
Google is jesus a historical fact. He is scientifically a fact.no one can deny his existence. But wether you believe he is what he claims he is,is entirely up to you. Remember the Romans where recording history for along time. Also the ark of the covenant real.its in a Monastery somewhere i know a person who has seen it.Ok prove there was a Jesus and or a GOD where is the proof
religions are innate, what is there to judge? They can't make decisions or create themselves, those capacities are mankind's alone.
I do not judge religions because concepts have no responsibility and are not sentient.
I also don't judge people based on belief, but I do call into question their actions.
So I should judge a few billion people (Christians and muslims) with one base blanket judgement based on a view of the middle east sensationalized on CNN.
I have met enough rational Christians and Muslims not to be that closed mined.
Sounds like your created a belief system based on network news, not your own personal experience with human beings.
Why not tell me how you were directly effected by the religious for not accepting their beliefs?
Some people believe in God some believe the news on television, guess what common denominator is belief not experiential reality.
Funny, I already posted proof that murder rates are lowest in the religious regions you mention, but you still argue a belief you can't actualize with science.
How come you aren't bitching about the belief systems that cause the plague of gang violence in America. What religion is driving that strife?
Really?
a little over 2000 Christians were murdered because of their religion last year.
Gee I wonder what percentage of 7 billion people constitutes 2000, maybe the science geniuses can tell me the chances of getting killed for being Christian versus say getting killed by lightening?
in 2014 about 24,000 people died from lightening.
More Christians died fighting a fake war as American soldiers than have been killed out of religious terrorism.
I wonder whose profiting from all this war and our insanely huge military budget. You read that part of the news too don't you?
The insanity in you judging a conflict you haven't seen with your own eyes by people you haven't met?
Insanity is to think that a few people who proclaim to represent a belief represent all the people who believe it, especially based on the scientific knowledge born from those who believed.
Your perception is not in line with reality it on your own conclusions, your own personal belief system.
Issac Newton came to know, and his belief was a catalyst as it was for many of the sciences founding fathers who helped develop the sciences (that conclusive knowing you so long to possess).
Dude..I'm just going to say it...in case you've hidden it from yourself: you are full of shit. You're simply batting the ball back and forth looking for reasons to excuse a bunch of dumbfounded dip shits...and cater to your own personal idealism. that's all this is...a different flavor of kool aid...but still...it's just kool aid.