You make some good points, but I don't see how you can be so confident in what "most" people think.
Because how people think is reflected by their perceptions, which are reflected by their words.
I do not believe myself to be more intelligent or have a greater capacity that others.
If I felt anything I was bringing to the table was a matter of personal genetic capacity I wouldn't expect the same from others and would keep my mouth shut.
Rather how people perceive is so influenced by the sum total of their lives that it becomes very difficult for most to break this mirror. Yet a mirror of our own design it is.
In my profession I work with very successful PHds who suffer the same malady.
Let me explain how it works.
Guy gets into Harvard, becomes lawyer, makes 100's of millions, has world by balls, has problem with IT systems, in arrogance lawyer things his success will automatically lend expertise to his IT problems. Successful lawyer fucks up things worse, but do to his overwhelming success elsewhere in life accuses It provider (me) of faulty technology. So confident is lawyer in his works that he is confident he is right.
If I was influenced by his success I might believe him (so many people are so intimidated by him that they crumble in his presence), but because I don't it is my task to show him why he is wrong without saying it in a way that accuses him of any fault.
I do this all day long, and it is not limited to technology.
It is no different than the shared perceptions in this thread, they are very personally relevant but universally shallow.
I have written about universal and relative truth to help open minds but I guess it is time for that conversation again.
A man stands in the USA and a man stands in Australia.
They both look up
if you ask them what they see and one man says night time sky and the other says daytime sky, they both speak in truth but it is relative. That is their truths are as equally true to them as individuals but not universally.
Now if they both simply said sky, they would be speaking in universal truth, as the reality is the same for both of them.
We live in a multi dimentsional world on every level but the human mind is "programmed" to think in two dimensional so to speak.
If you don't step outside this programming you will always be trapped in arguing relative truths as if they were universal.
Smart people in power know this and use this dynamic to sway public opinion.
The Nazis they were so expert at propaganda they are still studied today for that purpose.