There's a change in current temperature here that is causing huge issues for kelp forests that host a heap of sea life.
unbelievable!
For context that 16 million trees estimate is based on <8,000 hectares of commercial forest cut over 20 years. There are 1.4 million hectares of forest in Scotland.unbelievable!
I didn´t even know there were this many trees in Scotland and now they´re all dead wood? Sad, very sad
but the headline reads that the trees will be cut down in order to build windmills instead, right? This means that the trees will be gone for good. It also does not say which type of trees will be removed either.For context that 16 million trees estimate is based on <8,000 hectares of commercial forest cut over 20 years. There are 1.4 million hectares of forest in Scotland.
Trees have a lifespan, die / get cut, get replanted. In particular tree farms of fast growing conifer have little, if any, environmental value.
This is not significant. It's cherry-picking a headline grabbing number in support of an agenda.
https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-forestry-strategy-20192029/pages/4/#:~:text=Scotland has good growing conditions,from fast-growing conifer species.
yup. even the hated kudzu is a good food for various animals.Besides, all plants have environmental benefits, as far as I know.
Like you said, a production forest gets replanted, but with the windmill farms you only get barren plains with only windmills & meanwhile the sole is also disappearing from the North Sea i read yesterday and the researchers suspect the cables from the windmills to the mainland are the cause for the disappearance.
Beautiful landscape those windmill farms give.
View attachment 18869000
and better air quality and oxygen would feel much betterA coal plant would look so much better.
So your knee jerk reaction is to a sensationalist headline. And you're not going to even bother to invest just 5 minutes of research to see how the trees being cut down and not regrown are not carbon sinks of any kind. They are turning what is essentially a tree farm into a wind farm with the space between the energy generating windmills to be returned to native fauna which is a carbon sink. Not to mention hugely beneficial to local wildlife.but the headline reads that the trees will be cut down in order to build windmills instead, right? This means that the trees will be gone for good. It also does not say which type of trees will be removed either.
There must be land without trees someplace else...
Besides, all plants have environmental benefits, as far as I know.
who´s getting angry? just you.So your knee jerk reaction is to a sensationalist headline. And you're not going to even bother to invest just 5 minutes of research to see how the trees being cut down and not regrown are not carbon sinks of any kind. They are turning what is essentially a tree farm into a wind farm with the space between the energy generating windmills to be returned to native fauna which is a carbon sink. Not to mention hugely beneficial to local wildlife.
Sounds to me like their plan is a heck of a lot more eco friendly than a farm with little to no environmental benefit. But go ahead and continue on with your outrage. Don't let any facts get in the way of your anger.
good point. but there must be bits of land here and there where nothing much grows anywhere and animals don´t require the grass to feed and so on?the average height of energy-making windmills today is over 250 feet. i wonder how many trees (outside of the Sequoias in Cali) are so tall as to need cutting for this purpose? or do they want the ground bare between the windmills so they can install solar cells as well...? inquiring minds etc etc
enough people are installing solar that some places are passing laws that the utility companies don't have to pay YOU if you produce so much that your meter stops turning and the excess goes into the grid. they are like the IRS; they enjoy cashing checks but sure as hell hate writing them...Even small solar panels can be quite dear