What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Have You Been Vaccinated?

Have You Been Vaccinated?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 62 31.2%
  • No!

    Votes: 42 21.1%
  • Soon!

    Votes: 15 7.5%
  • No Way!

    Votes: 66 33.2%
  • I Just Wanna Watch!

    Votes: 14 7.0%

  • Total voters
    199

BudToaster

Well-known member
Veteran
Dr. Peter McCullough : “The C*VID v*ccines [actually, transfection] have at least three mechanisms by which they could start a cancer, or they could promote an existing cancer, and it may occur more rapidly because tumor defense systems are taken down. That's what we call turbo cancer.”

 

BudToaster

Well-known member
Veteran
We report many proteins not predicted by the genetic code. They are stable & abundant O( 10³ ) copies / cell. Generative mechanisms include codon-anticodon mismatches & RNA modifications. Their abundance depends on codon frequency & protein stability.



biorxiv.org
Alternate RNA decoding results in stable and abundant proteins in mammals
Amino acid substitutions may substantially alter protein stability and function, but the contribution of substitutions arising from alternate translation (deviations from the genetic code) is...
 

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
Turbo cancer... still not a thing.
1724923209635.jpeg
 

xtsho

Well-known member

That study was conducted by a corona virus denier and her husband. She's not a reliable source and her study is not accepted by any legitimate experts in the field.


Vibeke Manniche (born 15 November 1961) is a Danish physician (though without the right to work independently and without specialist recognition), author, and corona skeptic.

On 17 September 2021, she was placed under stricter supervision by the Danish Patient Safety Authority. The agency assessed that "there is reasonable suspicion that doctor Vibeke Manniche may constitute a deterioration in security due to serious reprehensible professional activities."

During the coronavirus pandemic, Manniche emerged as one of the most well-known Danish corona skeptics. During the first Danish lockdown in March 2020, Manniche, initially denied that there was a coronavirus epidemic in Denmark.
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
Turbo cancer... still not a thing.
It is a thing.
That study was conducted by a corona virus denier and her husband. She's not a reliable source and her study is not accepted by any legitimate experts in the field.


Vibeke Manniche (born 15 November 1961) is a Danish physician (though without the right to work independently and without specialist recognition), author, and corona skeptic.

On 17 September 2021, she was placed under stricter supervision by the Danish Patient Safety Authority. The agency assessed that "there is reasonable suspicion that doctor Vibeke Manniche may constitute a deterioration in security due to serious reprehensible professional activities."

During the coronavirus pandemic, Manniche emerged as one of the most well-known Danish corona skeptics. During the first Danish lockdown in March 2020, Manniche, initially denied that there was a coronavirus epidemic in Denmark.
This is the second research I read from the Danish about the fraud which is commited by Pfizer. A member of UK parlement did send a document of 44 pages to Sunak, the formal prime-ministerefrom the UK, about the fraud Pfizer did for the big roll-out. He got the info from an Israeli scientist.
The pandemic was btw over in April or May 2020.
 

xtsho

Well-known member
It is a thing.

This is the second research I read from the Danish about the fraud which is commited by Pfizer. A member of UK parlement did send a document of 44 pages to Sunak, the formal prime-ministerefrom the UK, about the fraud Pfizer did for the big roll-out. He got the info from an Israeli scientist.
The pandemic was btw over in April or May 2020.

The author of that article is also someone that has no credibility and the website Slay news is not a reliable source of information and should not be used as proof of anything.

I looked at the study from that article and came across this from MDPI where the study was published:

"Institutional Review Board Statement​

Ethical review and approval were waivered since the study relied exclusively on publicly available anonymized data."

Which means the study conducted by a Wife/Husband team was published but was not reviewed. And the data they used can't be verified.

People should avoid getting information from these obscure websites as more often than not the information available on them is not reliable.

"slaynews.com's audience is 72.07% male and 27.93% female. The largest age group of visitors are 65+ year olds."

Almost 70% of people that click on a link to that website leave once they realize that it's nothing but nonsense.

1725094860651.png
 

xtsho

Well-known member
Another thing people need to think about when they go clicking around on questionable obscure websites is that many of them exist only to install malware on your computer.

Be careful what you click on with some of these sites people are posting that have supposed studies that prove everything.
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
The author of that article is also someone that has no credibility and the website Slay news is not a reliable source of information and should not be used as proof of anything.

I looked at the study from that article and came across this from MDPI where the study was published:

"Institutional Review Board Statement​

Ethical review and approval were waivered since the study relied exclusively on publicly available anonymized data."

Which means the study conducted by a Wife/Husband team was published but was not reviewed. And the data they used can't be verified.

People should avoid getting information from these obscure websites as more often than not the information available on them is not reliable.

"slaynews.com's audience is 72.07% male and 27.93% female. The largest age group of visitors are 65+ year olds."

Almost 70% of people that click on a link to that website leave once they realize that it's nothing but nonsense.

View attachment 19057035
That is said by the fact checkers 🤣🤌

Screenshot_20240831_115207_X.jpg
Screenshot_20240831_115441_X.jpg

@mean mr.mustard Good science? 🙄🤌
 

xtsho

Well-known member
Tin foil futures sure went up after covid. It appears that tin foil futures could lead to profit.
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
Oh good grief. You post pure garbage sources. Twitter/X? Are you serious?

Done with the troll.
This isnt the first time they have commited fraud. Just look at their history record of convictions, but keep on dreaming.🤌

Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing
WASHINGTON – American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today.
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company has agreed to plead guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for misbranding Bextra with the intent to defraud or mislead. Bextra is an anti-inflammatory drug that Pfizer pulled from the market in 2005. Under the provisions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, a company must specify the intended uses of a product in its new drug application to FDA. Once approved, the drug may not be marketed or promoted for so-called "off-label" uses – i.e., any use not specified in an application and approved by FDA. Pfizer promoted the sale of Bextra for several uses and dosages that the FDA specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. The company will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States for any matter. Pharmacia & Upjohn will also forfeit $105 million, for a total criminal resolution of $1.3 billion.
In addition, Pfizer has agreed to pay $1 billion to resolve allegations under the civil False Claims Act that the company illegally promoted four drugs – Bextra; Geodon, an anti-psychotic drug; Zyvox, an antibiotic; and Lyrica, an anti-epileptic drug – and caused false claims to be submitted to government health care programs for uses that were not medically accepted indications and therefore not covered by those programs. The civil settlement also resolves allegations that Pfizer paid kickbacks to health care providers to induce them to prescribe these, as well as other, drugs. The federal share of the civil settlement is $668,514,830 and the state Medicaid share of the civil settlement is $331,485,170. This is the largest civil fraud settlement in history against a pharmaceutical company.
 

BudToaster

Well-known member
Veteran
The very fact that they can't spell COVID speaks volumes to their professionalism.
it is necessary to prevent banning of the message on some platforms ... at least that is the message that is portrayed. the impression to be conveyed is that the information is too unsettling. like the information is so super counter narrative that there is active surveillance of all social media posts to prevent the misinformation. thus a little obfuscation to "fool the algorithm". kind of naive since the AI has no problem discerning the content regardless of spelling. so if you see it, you were meant to see it.

all part of the limited spectrum of debate. my mind is the battlefield.

the thing i find that lets me separate the fact from fiction is being healthy ... i know what it takes to be healthy ... and understanding biology. most people just don't know. that's the problem. not a fake pandemic.
 
Top