I agree....very stupid..... no link huh??????
IMO you have made very odd comments and cant link to any of that.,....
Claiming Im wrong doesnt cut it....
I was a mentor on overgrow.....
Ive met more than my share of karma bullies in my day........
I did a lot of work with sick plants..... years
got a lot of respect..... once I gave up being mentor...... the respect vanished.....
I met lots of karma bullies..... and I lost my passion for working sick plants......
I asked for a link ....not song and dance
Thank you for your kind post.....
but...that doesnt seem to make sense with this part of my last link....
However it is not unusual for individual plants to bear both male and female
flowers, a condition called monoecy. Flowers of both sexes sometimes occur on
separate(Imperfect) inflorescences, or sometimes within the same(perfect) inflorescence.
The enclosed words are mine.....
Here is my first link.....
I see no real contradtiction.......just clarification
Reproduction
Cannabis normally has imperfect flowers, with staminate "male" and pistillate "female" flowers occurring on separate plants.[14] It is not unusual, however, for individual plants to bear both male and female flowers.[15] Although monoecious plants are often referred to as "hermaphrodites," true hermaphrodites (which are less common) bear staminate and pistillate structures on individual flowers, whereas monoecious plants bear male and female flowers at different locations on the same plant.
This is of course the essence of my misunderstanding....if it is indeed me who is not understanding....
not a bully I just have little patience for willful ignorance and the spread of misinformation, I thought my first post was pretty concise and clear cut... it should have been case closed... but since its not I will close it.
1) no one in this thread cares about your hypothesis
2) I learned never to argue with fools or children
3) there are only a handful of cannabis experts in the world and you are not one, nor did you mentor any of them
4) there is a thread all about the history of herms, in the breeders lab, go espouse there and see what happens... https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=302523
you didn't provide any links to anything... you just cut and paste BS to support your ignorant position.
here... if you can comprehend this, then the arguement is over... well it's done on my end regardless if you wanna continue to spout non sense thats on you.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/24667/angiosperm/73114/Reproductive-structures#ref596945
(this excerpt is a little bit into the article)
Imperfect flower
Plant anatomy
A complete flower contains all four organs, while an incomplete flower is missing at least one. A bisexual (or “perfect”) flower has both stamens and carpels, and a unisexual (or “imperfect”) flower either lacks stamens (and is called carpellate) or lacks carpels (and is called staminate). Species with both staminate flowers and carpellate flowers on the same plant (e.g., corn) are monoecious, from the Greek for “one house.” Species in which the staminate flowers are on one plant and the carpellate flowers are on another are dioecious, from the Greek for “two houses.”
---------------------- Edit: btw, the words in parentheses above aren't mine they are the encyclopedia's... unlike you I dont distort the quotes with opinion
^^^ as far as cannabis is concerned... perfect = herm, imperfect = no herm... monoecious means- both sex organs develop on a single individual, dioecious means- male and female sex organs develop on seperate individuals (serperate plants completely).
so you are wrong, as by definition, imperfect flowers never display both sexes anywhere on the same plant!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dioecious
adjective di·oe·cious \(ˌ)dī-ˈē-shəs\
Definition of DIOECIOUS
1
: having male reproductive organs in one individual and female in another
2
: having staminate and pistillate flowers borne on different individuals
Please stop contributing to the spread of misinformation... thank you