What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Flush and starve plants during flowering??

Riddleme

Member
As the guy that wrote "The Truth About Flushing" (Google it) years ago I want to first address all the new growers that may read this.

You will find a lot of hype and a lot of myths as well as a lot of BS in pot forums. You will also find little nuggets of truth, but you have to look for em and it means a lot of reading. My advice to new growers has always been, go read regular garden forums, Google "Al Tapla" and read everything you can find !!! He is a regular garden guru and his instruction is pure gold. Learn to grow and keep a plant healthy. Learn to read the plants needs and get 3 good harvest under your belt. Then start experimenting !!! and see stuff for yourself, keep an open mind and never put your foot down as this is how we learn new things. I've been growing for over 40 years and I still have experiments going in every grow, my current grow ,,,,

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=295624

Has 4 experiments running at the moment. There are also pics and post that will verify things I'm about to share :)

My point, new growers, is there are a lot of ways to grow this plant and you need to find what works for you and fills your needs. The best way to do this is try things that you find via reading/research and observe the results for yourself.

As already stated the flushing debate has gone on for many years and I have always stood on the flushing is bad side. If you actually go read my post on the truth about flushing you'll see it does have links to science backing up the points, but I have been told there are dead links now these years later. Doesn't matter, I'm not here to pimp the article or to argue, I'm here to settle this decades long debate and give the other side their science lol.

Yeppers, both sides are right in terms of the finished product and for new growers this may well be the most important thing I share with you today. Good buds, non harsh, white ash, tasty buds are the result of a proper cure ,,,,,,, period ! Bad taste, harshness, snap crackle pop and black ash are the result of unfermented sugars, not nutes and are the result of a bad/improper cure ,,,,,,, period ! Take a teaspoon of sugar and apply a flame to it, you'll see what I mean. It is of utmost importance that you learn how to properly cure em !!!

I myself, do things very differently then most, when my plants are ready to harvest I water em with boiling water, then leave em under the lights for 3~4 days I keep em green and healthy, I use chem nutes and I don't flush at the end. If you read my grow journal, you'll see independent smoke reports that describe my buds. I invented and use a fermentation chamber to dry and cure my herb and it is based on the way tobacco and other plants are cured, a brief description,,,,

In general, curing can be divided into three distinct stages: yellowing, leaf drying, and stem drying. The first stage can be described as a period of major chemical conversions and color development. Air temperature in the barn is maintained between 30 and 40°C, with relative humidity of 80 to 95%, (5,12) for about 48 h or until the leaves turn yellow. In the second stage, air temperature in the barn is increased gradually to 50 or 60°C, while relative humidity is lowered to allow more rapid moisture removal. This stage lasts for 36 to 72 h (12). The last stage (stem drying) generally requires 36 to 48 h. Air temperature is increased to 74°C with further decrease of relative humidity to permit rapid drying of the midrib.
From Here ,,,,
https://boltonsmokersclub.wordpress...vouring-and-finishing-tobacco-for-cigarettes/

There are pics of my fermentation chamber in my journal. note: I do not use the extreme temps & humidity, but the stages do occur as described in my process.

The science is basic and simple and is also very well known. In the absence of O2 (oxygen) ALL plants go into a survival mode converting sugars into alcohol known as fermentation (what we call the cure) I have attached a pic that shows this process.

My watering with boiling water imitates a flood condition and starves the roots of O2. N is the major component for the required energy to properly convert the sugars to alcohol and once I boil em they start pullin on the leaves because they can no longer get nutes from the roots.

Here is the science with regard to how plants handle floods ,,,,

There are many types of fermentative bacteria in soils, such as the genus Bacillus, Clostridium, and Lactobacillus. 4 ATP molecules per molecule of glucose are produced by fermentation, while 38 ATP molecules are produced by aerobic respiration. Although the energy yield via fermentation is less than respiration, fermentation plays an important role in anaerobic respiration for obligate and facultative anaerobic bacteria, including denitrifier, Fe3+, Mn4+, SO42-, reducers, and methanogens. Sugar (glucose or fructose) is broken down into simple compounds (e.g. formate, acetate, and ethanol) during fermentation. Also, numerous fermentation products, such as carbon dioxide, fatty acid, lactic, alcohols, are released into soils. These compounds serve as substrates for other anaerobic bacteria. Thus, low molecular weight organic compounds produced from fermentation influence the reduction of Fe(III), Mn(IV), SO42-, and CO2(Richardson And Vepraskas 2000).
From Here ,,,,,
https://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Flooded_soils#Fermentation_under_Anoxic_Conditions

When you flush at the end or limit the nute regimen and cause the plants to fade you are taking away the "other" way that plants get and use O2 which is via gas exchange thru the stomata. As leaves fade and die the stomata are decreased and you thereby decrease the gas exchange and access to O2 once again causing the plant go into survival mode.

Here is the science ,,,,

Green plants require oxygen for normal growth and development. The energy released in cellular respiration, from the breakdown of carbohydrates and complex organic molecules, consumes oxygen and releases CO2. Most plants respire continuously, day and night, requiring a continuous supply of oxygen. Anaerobic respiration or fermentation occurs in the absence of oxygen. The products of this form of respiration are often deleterious to the plant and the energy released is relatively small compared to aerobic respiration. Roots also require oxygen for aerobic respiration which they obtain directly from the growing media. The absorption of salts and root extension are dependent upon the energy supplied from respiration.
From Here ,,,,
https://www.hydrofarm.com/resources/articles/factors_plantgrowth.php

Folks this is Botany 101, there is nothing complicated about it. The advantage of the method that ThaiBliss describes is that in the low dose feeding the required energy to process the sugars properly is available and the swelling being described is because the roots are still functioning though not at peak performance levels.

In the end both camps are right for different reasons. IMO the flush, low dose feed and fade methods will enhance the flavor profile (the fading of tea leaves is how different flavors are obtained) For me this occurs in my chamber. The keep em green camp feed till the end are getting better yields and have healthier stress resistant plants.

This natural process still occurs even if you don't boil, flood, or flush/fade your plants it simply takes a bit longer and requires a different mindset as to how you dry. You want em to dry slowly to take advantage of the process to obtain a proper cure. Back in the day we dried em in bundles wrapped in sheets to facilitate this process.

Two other practices widely known are to girdle the stems and/or to break the stems knocking the plants over before harvest. Both of these methods require a few weeks for results to occur properly.

And there you have it the science that explains why it all works and as I said earlier growers should try all methods and discover what works best for them !!!!
 

Attachments

  • alcohola.jpg
    alcohola.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 20
Last edited:

Ras Mason

Well-known member
Veteran
HI Rid.
Interesting views.
I would like to maybe discuss further when i come back to your place.
Been quite took with some patients lately.
bless.
jf
 

Izoc666

Member
Rid, I always like to read your "The Truth About Flushing" thread years ago. It turned out you're right and you turned my meds into premium weed ! Thanks for sharing, sir.
 

cyat

Well-known member
Veteran
Thanks riddleme!!! great info.. Can u explain this root boiling a little more please?
 

Riddleme

Member
Thanks riddleme!!! great info.. Can u explain this root boiling a little more please?
Nothing much to explain, I simply pour boiling water thru the pot, enough so to get run off. The plant pretty much reacts instantly and then I wait for several days and chop.

Tis a bit of a bitch in hydro I'm told but there are folks doin it.
 

ThaiBliss

Well-known member
Veteran
...The best way to do this is try things that you find via reading/research and observe the results for yourself.

...it does have links to science backing up the points...

..Good buds, non harsh, white ash, tasty buds are the result of a proper cure ,,,,,,, period...

Just to clarify my perspective, I'm not arguing low nutrients for improving taste, my entire focus is on potency and the quality of the high, even at the expense of lost quantity. I understand that others reading this thread have completely different perspectives and goals.

Yes, do your own experiments. Be very careful of your conclusions. Many people take something as fact, then jump to other conclusions based on that fact, that often has no basis for the conclusion.

I do have some scientific educational experience, and I know it is extremely difficult to design studies that prove a specific theory. Conclusions are often derived that are not valid. This is why experiments are repeated by others, often with different methods and perspectives that keep the conclusions honest. Experimental results that point to a conclusion, often lead to entirely differently designed experiments to prove the next step in a theory. It is like a mathematical equation that has to go through many transformations before you can fully support a conclusion. Even the most highly trained scientists fall into the traps of experimental design flaws, and/or false conclusions based on the results. Unfortunately, there are precious few studies of Cannabis, and the vast majority are junk, due to cultural biases and lack of peer review. It is our duty to be skeptical, and keep experimenting. Please share your results.
:biggrin:


I do some other gardening (LOL), and each plant or even strain of a species of plant has unique requirements. I fertilize the crap out of some plants with nitrogen, corn; broccoli; asparagus. With other plants, I go out of my way to make sure they don't get too much nitrogen, tomatoes; herbs; grapes. My practice of low nutrient growing, especially nitrogen, is in no way unique to Cannabis.

I must say that the best cure I have ever accomplished was a type of fermentation cure. I tightly wrapped about what ended up being about an ounce of bud into a piece of paper while still wet. I put it in a hot attic for a week. The first time I checked , it was perfectly dry, and beautifully cured. There were two strains mixed together, and each came out their own natural color.

I have always been afraid to repeat this cure, since it seems so risky without some type if internal monitoring to prevent mold or over drying.



I'm curing the Bangi Haze more slowly:

picture.php


ThaiBliss
 

Riddleme

Member
Just to clarify my perspective, I'm not arguing low nutrients for improving taste, my entire focus is on potency and the quality of the high, even at the expense of lost quantity. I understand that others reading this thread have completely different perspectives and goals.

ThaiBliss

You and I agree on this for sure !!! Potency takes first place for me, taste, smell, bag appeal don't matter at all to me, as I only grow for me.

I didn't mention potency because I figured everyone knew a properly cured bud is more potent
 
B

bajangreen

I am still on the fence on this one since the plants cannibalizing themselves is the same thing as a plant deficiency, if you get my drift.

So we are saying that a deficient plant at harvest gives the cleanest smoke. witch can be true because a deficient plant has the least "stuff" in it.

My question is if a proper cure has the ability to remove all the unwanted stuff if the plant is harvested green.
 

Riddleme

Member
A fermentation chamber cured Colorado Thunderfuck ,,,
 

Attachments

  • cc_ctf1.jpg
    cc_ctf1.jpg
    140.7 KB · Views: 23
  • S_SAM_3122.jpg
    S_SAM_3122.jpg
    105 KB · Views: 21
  • S_SAM_3121.jpg
    S_SAM_3121.jpg
    84.8 KB · Views: 20
  • S_SAM_3117.jpg
    S_SAM_3117.jpg
    99.6 KB · Views: 21

Riddleme

Member
A bud broken in half to show its internal yummyness :biggrin:
 

Attachments

  • S_SAM_3124.jpg
    S_SAM_3124.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 25
  • cc_ctf2.jpg
    cc_ctf2.jpg
    109.2 KB · Views: 22
  • cc_ctf3.jpg
    cc_ctf3.jpg
    135.8 KB · Views: 23
Top