Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
He said he can ASK the AG to look into anything. Anyone can ask. Doesn't mean Barr has to act on it. But, if it is important they both have obligations related to their oaths of office.
-
ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
Deep State: Exposed
- Thread starter med4u
- Start date
He said he can ASK the AG to look into anything. Anyone can ask. Doesn't mean Barr has to act on it. But, if it is important they both have obligations related to their oaths of office.
Absolem
Active member
The same will be said about Trump 6 years from now. Nobody will admit to voting for him just like they won't admit they voted for Bush.
Absolem
Active member
Ask Badfishy. He's one of their "bakers".
minds_I So said:here, i fixed it for you, lol...
Absolem
Active member
Seethe away Trumpkins.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-wont-pursue-criminal-charges-against-mccabe
“We write to inform you that, after careful consideration, the government has decided not to pursue criminal charges against your client, Andrew G. McCabe,” Cooney wrote.
The DOJ added: “Based on the totality of the circumstances and all of the information known to the government at this time, we consider the matter closed."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-wont-pursue-criminal-charges-against-mccabe
“We write to inform you that, after careful consideration, the government has decided not to pursue criminal charges against your client, Andrew G. McCabe,” Cooney wrote.
The DOJ added: “Based on the totality of the circumstances and all of the information known to the government at this time, we consider the matter closed."
here, i fixed it for you, lol...
Hello all,
Now that you mention it, if he had integrity he would have never auditioned for the job in the first place.
minds_I
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
LOL, now these idiots think I voted for Bush. I wasn't even old enough to vote dummy, 9/11 happened when I was 13.
TEXAS BILL WOULD MAKE PROTESTING PIPELINES A FELONY ON PAR WITH ATTEMPTED MURDER
A bill making its way through the Texas legislature would make protesting pipelines a third-degree felony, the same as attempted murder.
“It’s an anti-protest bill, favoring the fossil fuel industry, favoring corporations over people.” — Frankie Orona, executive director of the Society of Native Nations
H.B. 3557, which is under consideration in the state Senate after passing the state House earlier this month, ups penalties for interfering in energy infrastructure construction by making the protests a felony. Sentences would range from two to 10 years.
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/05/21/texas-bill-would-make-protesting-pipelines-a-felony-on-par-with-attempted-murder/?utm_campaign=meetedgar&utm_medium=social&utm_source=meetedgar.com&fbclid=IwAR3_oMDK-_ZIP7XPCuztk3LXZhj4IZSqx-RkbWUcIepzucuzEi-tw00meVw
Bill: HB 3557
Relating to civil and criminal liability for engaging in certain conduct involving a critical infrastructure facility; creating criminal offenses.
https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=86R&Bill=HB3557#vote161
A bill making its way through the Texas legislature would make protesting pipelines a third-degree felony, the same as attempted murder.
“It’s an anti-protest bill, favoring the fossil fuel industry, favoring corporations over people.” — Frankie Orona, executive director of the Society of Native Nations
H.B. 3557, which is under consideration in the state Senate after passing the state House earlier this month, ups penalties for interfering in energy infrastructure construction by making the protests a felony. Sentences would range from two to 10 years.
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/05/21/texas-bill-would-make-protesting-pipelines-a-felony-on-par-with-attempted-murder/?utm_campaign=meetedgar&utm_medium=social&utm_source=meetedgar.com&fbclid=IwAR3_oMDK-_ZIP7XPCuztk3LXZhj4IZSqx-RkbWUcIepzucuzEi-tw00meVw
Bill: HB 3557
Relating to civil and criminal liability for engaging in certain conduct involving a critical infrastructure facility; creating criminal offenses.
https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=86R&Bill=HB3557#vote161
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Texas has it wrong, protesting... no matter how dumb the reason may be... Is a constitutional right.
NEWS FLASH: No one believes this but the Party that most people so happily & willingly divide yourselves into ; Democrat/Republican/Libertarian/Veteran , don't give a flying fuck about your Constitution .
That much should be obvious . Maybe Julian Assange , Bradley Manning(aka Chelsie) or Edward Snowden could chime in here .......
(He says facetiously)
The U.S. Constitution doesn't even mention political parties. President George Washington warned about "the danger of parties." But even then, our leaders didn't always agree. In the 1790s, a quarrel broke out between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton over how much power to grant the federal government. The argument split their followers into two separate groups - the beginning of U.S. political parties.
https://www.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=4706
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Maybe I spoke without my coffee first but isn't protesting a form of freedom of speech?
Truth! I have been sayin this for over a year. Voting for him will be akin to voting for the Iraq War. No one will claim the orange dumpster fire in a few years....
Talk to Julian Assange , Bradley Manning(aka Chelsie) or Edward Snowden about your freedom of speech or right to know
Assange: In prison awaiting extradition to the U.S.
Manning: In prison
Snowden: In exile
1st Amendment is all but gone & "Red Flags" are fast after the second , but keep on going blaming the other faction of the "Party"
TEXAS BILL WOULD MAKE PROTESTING PIPELINES A FELONY ON PAR WITH ATTEMPTED MURDER
A bill making its way through the Texas legislature would make protesting pipelines a third-degree felony, the same as attempted murder.
“It’s an anti-protest bill, favoring the fossil fuel industry, favoring corporations over people.” — Frankie Orona, executive director of the Society of Native Nations
H.B. 3557, which is under consideration in the state Senate after passing the state House earlier this month, ups penalties for interfering in energy infrastructure construction by making the protests a felony. Sentences would range from two to 10 years.
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/05/21/texas-bill-would-make-protesting-pipelines-a-felony-on-par-with-attempted-murder/?utm_campaign=meetedgar&utm_medium=social&utm_source=meetedgar.com&fbclid=IwAR3_oMDK-_ZIP7XPCuztk3LXZhj4IZSqx-RkbWUcIepzucuzEi-tw00meVw
Bill: HB 3557
Relating to civil and criminal liability for engaging in certain conduct involving a critical infrastructure facility; creating criminal offenses.
https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=86R&Bill=HB3557#vote161
Did you read the law? It applies to private property, and fenced and secured infrastructure. It doesn't say anything about protesting. It does say it is for people who damage said infrastructure.
I am 100% behind any Americans right to peacefully protest. That's not what the law is about. We are concerned about foreign countries hacking our infrastructure, why would Americans be allowed to destroy infrastructure with immunity? Especially on private property.
From reading your post, I get that you are suspicious of both parties. That obviously is a fair suspicion. That being said you really have to read what is written. Doing a little digging is required to avoid bullshit these days.
The waking times is not a reputable publication
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-waking-times/
According to who ? The FBI ? FCC ? CIA ? Or the people that are prosecuting Assange , Manning & Snowden ?
"Did you read the law?"
Yes I did . So I have to ask you the same question . If you did then you know the words " private property" , are not contained therein H.B. No. 3557
According to who ? The FBI ? FCC ? CIA ? Or the people that are prosecuting Assange , Manning & Snowden ?
"Did you read the law?"
Yes I did . So I have to ask you the same question . If you did then you know the words " private property" , are not contained therein H.B. No. 3557
Oh snap. Major miscommunication bud. I don't at all disagree with the sentiment on Assange, Manning, and Snowden. The constitution is being dismantled bit by bit.
I was referring to the Texas law. The law Isnt about peaceful protest. The article is blatantly misleading. The source is a left-wing Infowars clone.
freedom of speech is not absolute; it has limits. if your protesting involves destruction of property, you have crossed the line. that said, i disagree with the premise that destruction of private property should carry same weight as a murder charge, unless the destruction caused foreseeable deaths.
