Come on PF tighten up. Huber is in Utah and Durham is US attorney in Connecticut... you think Barr is dumb enough to take to trial in DC?
Deep State: Exposed
- Thread starter med4u
- Start date
Come on PF tighten up. Huber is in Utah and Durham is US attorney in Connecticut... you think Barr is dumb enough to take to trial in DC?
Humm, I just assumed it would be done in DC. Either way, I think it will be a rush to save one's ass. Like I said before snitches and cops are cut from same cloth.
3 years is only used by you, and you sound deep into your second tube of glue once again.
Who cares about impeachment, has no teeth to it. The process and the investigations are what’s worthwhile. No double jeopardy protection for trump is the bonus.
*Hempy, your going to have to explain what is so obvious, for those of us less cryptic.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
There's a high probability that many of these crimes will actually by tried by military tribunal, rather than civil courts of law. Due to the fact that they were working on behalf of foreign governments.
Hello all,
aw snap!
Judge calls Trump impeachment probe legal, says House must get Mueller grand jury information.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/25/jud...eller-material-citing-impeachment-chance.html
Buahahahaha
minds_I
aw snap!
Judge calls Trump impeachment probe legal, says House must get Mueller grand jury information.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/25/jud...eller-material-citing-impeachment-chance.html
Buahahahaha
minds_I
Okay, so in accordance with the definition what kinda odds you going to give me on a wager?
Lol the good ol moving goal posts. Investigations that find ZERO to prosecute or use for ummmpeachmints is a good thing? I guess investigations that lead to prosecution is a ‘great’ thing... imagine 14.50/hr... wew the timeline... keep seething
Inb4 there won’t be prosecutions against anybody... If there wasn’t the possibility of a crime committed, the investigation would not now be CRIMINAL.
Ahhhh going with the hurr durr unprecedented politically motivated impeachment? Or a full senate trial and removal from office? I give a 1:2 odds for first 1: 6 gorillion for that latter. However I don’t bet in pesos
Just read your definition. If the dems can’t pull off an impeachment w a house majority, there will be no DNC come 2020. Dems backed themselves into a corner and we both know this (even though you will never admit it). After 3 years of we will get him, they have to. Their biggest fear is when it moves to the senate tho. 2020 is over already.
M
Mr D
Former FBI general counsel James Baker has reportedly ‘flipped’ and is now cooperating with the Barr-Durham investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation.
Let's see which one yields the most damaging information...
Just the process as defined Since I am completely apolitical that would be the basis entertained....semantics you know...the foundation of communicated knowledge.
Former FBI general counsel James Baker has reportedly ‘flipped’ and is now cooperating with the Barr-Durham investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation.
Let's see which one yields the most damaging information...
You've yet to consider how this opinion will weigh on future decisions.
tRump has hung a lot on that "It's illegal" defense
Whatever comes out of the investigations and hearings can be prosecuted once trump leaves office in other courts.
trump couldn’t be charged for several charges of obstruction in the Mueller investigation, simply because he is a sitting president. Once out he can be charged, within 5 years anyway.
Most that can happen from impeachment is removal from office
That’s why the investigations, hearings, etc. are what matters, ie the impeachment process. Losing his job is nearly nothing as far as consequences go.
M
Mr D
It's enough to impeach him on if it can be proven.
M
Mr D
And Schiff is a beacon of truth?
When is he going to show us the Russian collusion evidence he said he had?
