Absolem
Active member
I think the final report posted in the link is dated March 2020; you read it since then? Or an earlier rough draft?
UA-F is the school I graduated from in the mid-80s, with an undergrad degree. They're known for their engineering school.
Don't know if there's significance in the professional title he's given in the report, versus the title the school gives in their listing. I'd say the issue would be whether or not he's technically qualified to speak as a 'forensic engineer.' And that would be more important than what ever the University has him listed as, at least in my opinion..
IOW, if the assertions in the report are solid, or well-founded, then technicalities in titles becomes less important, imo.
As I stated, I'm undecided. I know what I don't know.... some of the time.
What I do know, as stated, is that numerous agencies received extra-legal authority they hadn't been able to acquire during less emotional times.....
And I know I have a government, that, like many, lies for convenience sake... or strategy.. for decades, if not centuries. And that, as an example, the desire to enter the Vietnam Police Action, via the exaggerating and dishonest presentation of the Gulf of Tonkin circumstances, or the Iraq War and the WMDs (as just 2 brazen examples), left the our Government responsible for INCREDIBLE numbers of unnecessary dead from numerous countries... not to mention violating International Laws.
That alone establishes them as capable of acts of sociopathy born of 'desire', or born of their tweaked version(s) of 'the greater good.' Or what ever they tell themselves justifies their actions when they look into the mirror.
That much, I know.
I read the report back in late 2019. I know since then a few things have been added. What I read was added I didn't see a need to re read the report.
My degree deals with reading data. So the first thing that stood out for me was the group he belonged too and using his two assistants. Plus he based most of his data on computer modeling. Just wish there would have been more lead researchers involved with more data points.
Compared to the NIST report the NIST had several thousand people that compiled the data. 1000's of photo's and individual witness accounts taken first hand. 100's of lead researchers working on it.
I hear ya about how unethical our government has been at times. Especially regarding WMD's that you brought up.
For me I look at just prior to WWll where scientists around the world had to meet in private and risk getting in serious trouble just to discuss what they found in their studies and experiments. These people just loved science. It's all they wanted to discuss. Einstein barely made it there. The people there didn't care about what government each was from. Discussing science was front and center.
Looking at the NIST report were there some government based stooges involved? Oh yeah. But IMO there were way more people who cared about the data and getting it right where it drowned out the stooges pushing for a certain outcome. Mainly because of the overwhelming amount of people working on it.
Nice to chat with ya.