What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
  • ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest in October! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Dark Mission: NASA's dirty little secret.

G

Guest

Yup....****ing circus goes on without me. **** you ICMAG. Zionist run website. Gypsy, you're a ****ing pussy scumbag. **** all of you. I'll take any one of you man to man you pussy ****s. **** you. Stand up, get out from behind the keyboard and I'll kick your sorry ****ing ass like you deserve. Aidios ****ing bitch boys.
 

greenhead

Active member
Veteran
Yo man, people still can't read what you're typing, so why do you keep replying ?

You've already given me one neg rep today, so I don't think I have to worry about getting any more from you at least for today, lol.

:laughing: :wave:
 

HCSmyth

Member
^He is just not objective AT ALL. He wants to believe somewhere on Mars, it is teaming with life despite ANY evidence right now to support this.
 

Babombeez

Active member
watermelon said:
i couldnt be bothered to read most of the thread becuase this is just clearly bollocks.

the japanese have just mapped the entire moon in high def. did they find anything interesting? no. if they did theyd blatently tell everyone just to get one-up on the US, plus theyd blatently want to work on the technology.

Back to the moon...

Depends on your definition of "interesting." Regardless of all the video and high def. satellite pictures they have sent back, Japan has still not sent an un-manned probe to the moon, nor has China! Japan will not send an an unmanned probe until 2015, and China in 2012... China hopes it will have a manned mission by 2017, which is doubtful, but possible...

You can only do so much with satellite imagery, so in order to really find out someone must land on the moon and take close up pictures and prove to me that there are NO structures on the moon... These moon "structures" are said to be constructed of some type of glass material, which is nearly invisible from high above the Moon...

Any body have any ideas why everyone is heading for the moon all of a sudden, what is with this new Space Race? Why did the United States stop going to the moon in the 70's, why if we had the technology to do it then, why have we not done it hundreds of times by now? As you all know technology makes giant leaps every year, so if we have the technology why aren't we doing it by now?

Just some food for thought...

Also, here's a little more insight into NASA cooperating with the Defense Department, it is about weather modification fore military purposes...

Taken from space.com,

"Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries," the report stated. "The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together," the authors noted.

In 2025, the report summarized, U.S. aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications.

"Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures," the report concluded.

But if whipping up weather can be part of a warfighter’s tool kit, couldn’t those talents be utilized to retarget or neutralize life, limb and property-destroying storms?

...Additionally, federal laboratories with their extensive computational modeling skills would also play a lead role in the development of a science of weather modification. NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would find their respective niches too. The satellite diagnostic capabilities in those agencies would play a strong role, Eastlund suggested.

Beez
 

PhenoMenal

Hairdresser
Veteran
heh, our little buddy Stoned2Death seems to be a bit annoyed about not being able to type. But I can! ;) - he just gave me a negative karma point with a lame message. Ouch! A negative karma point, nooooo! ;)
*YAWNNNNNNNNN*
 
Last edited:

nycdfan042

Its COOL to DROOL!!!!!!
Veteran
i thought that jew hating, conspiracy theory spouting, pissed off lil kid was banned and his mom banned him from using her HP pavillion(something about skin heads in swastica thongs?)!?
 

PhenoMenal

Hairdresser
Veteran
Stoned2Death said:
Yup....****ing circus goes on without me. **** you ICMAG. Zionist run website. Gypsy, you're a ****ing pussy scumbag. **** all of you. I'll take any one of you man to man you pussy ****s. **** you. Stand up, get out from behind the keyboard and I'll kick your sorry ****ing ass like you deserve. Aidios ****ing bitch boys.

geez, what are they teaching kids in school these days ???
 

Nubie Biatch

Active member
Just take a bunch of expletives, slurs, and childish comebacks....mix them together....and bam...Stoned2Death Tribute Thread.

As far as the moon goes...I think that's a losing battle beez. I'm only saying that because science has put all that nonsense to bed. The End.
 

Babombeez

Active member
Hey guys, notice the title of this thread isn't "Stoned2Death bashing fest."....

Can we try to stick to NASA? I am open to hearing everyone's opinions and I always enjoy debating and a good, intellectual argument.

So basically what I am getting from a lot of people is that NASA is telling us the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

Are you serious? Cause if you believe this then I do agree this is a losing battle, but if you believe that they are hiding things from us and have political and religious motives then there is a lot more to this then meets the eye...


Beez
 

PhenoMenal

Hairdresser
Veteran
Hey guys, notice the title of this thread isn't "Stoned2Death bashing fest."....
Can we try to stick to NASA?
heh, you mean like Stoned2Death stuck to NASA with his Zionist/anti-Zionist propaganda?

Like Nubie said, theories shmeories - there's nothing to argue about as SCIENCE has already put all this nonsense to bed with FACTS. The end.
 

Babombeez

Active member
PhenoMenal said:
heh, you mean like Stoned2Death stuck to NASA with his Zionist/anti-Zionist propaganda?

Like Nubie said, theories shmeories - there's nothing to argue about as SCIENCE has already put all this nonsense to bed with FACTS. The end.


No facts to argue? Lay all these facts out, will you? Gravity is still a theory, Plate Tectonics is still a theory, "Expanding Earth" is still a theory. Darwin's model of evolution is just a theory, and SCIENCE has proven that Darwin was incorrect on many levels, such as the fossil record, punctuated equilibriums, especially when it comes to the science of proton precession, and the wobbling of the Earth's axis, and magnetic pole reversals...

Science has not put this to rest with "facts." Perhaps that is just your opinion, but the truth is NASA could put this to rest if they really wanted to but have done nothing about it, and if NASA really indeed has been covering up lunar ruins then what are the political and religious implications? Do you really think if they found something that remarkable they would disclose it to the public? What do people in control like to do best? Remain in control, by manipulating information that gets to the masses...

*edit: by the way why are you misrepresenting me by acting like I approved of S2D's Zionist rants, I could care less, this thread was about NASA and how they have been keeping crucial information from the public for decades, not anything but NASA...

My thread is no place for name calling, bashing, or anything of the sort, and if you don't like it then go somewhere else. This thread's sole purpose is for intellectual debate about NASA and space exploration.

So whatever you have to do to remain polite and respectful, I don't know, smoke a joint, just keep the peace....

Thanks!


Beez
 
Last edited:

Pops

Resident pissy old man
Veteran
Beez, it is pretty hard for me to believe that you feel that NASA has any religious motives. if you really believe that, then I think you are just plain over the top. The vast majority of the scientists that my son worked with were disbelievers, just as he was. Most scientists have no room for religion. You might make a case that a few of them might be Masons, but then, so was my father-in-law. Hell, I was even in DeMolay when I was a youth. I still know the secret handshake. That doesn't mean that I am part of any conspiracy.

Are you really ignorant enough to believe that any intelligent civilization would build structures on the surface of the moon? Do you realize how many meteors have hit the moon? Mars has some 43,000 craters and it hasn't been hit nearly as many times as the moon. Mars has several discernible caves on its surface. If man ever puts a station there, that is probably where they will put it, as Mars has ferocious wind and dust storms and still gets hit with a considerable amount of meteoroids. The atmosphere there simply isn't thick enough to protect the surface,as Earths is. The moon has no atmosphere, thus no protection.

Please don't let science and logic get in the way of your fantasy. If you want to pound your pud at night thinking about aliens, be my guest. Perhaps one day, you will get tired of playing Peter Pan and decide to grow up.

BTW, now that your ugly step-sister,S2D is gone, you are all alone with no one to inflate your ego and agree with you.
 

Pops

Resident pissy old man
Veteran
BTW, NASA may be listed as a civilian agency, but when your funding comes from the U.S. government,you are not a civilian agency. Yes,they do co-operate with the CIA,NSA and the U.S. Military. Some of their projects are even covers for other agencies. How do you think they keep their funding, when they don't do shit? NASA is basically an old folks home for aerospace engineers who are to young to retire, and still want to keep their high salaries.
 

Babombeez

Active member
Pops said:
Beez, it is pretty hard for me to believe that you feel that NASA has any religious motives. if you really believe that, then I think you are just plain over the top. The vast majority of the scientists that my son worked with were disbelievers, just as he was. Most scientists have no room for religion. You might make a case that a few of them might be Masons, but then, so was my father-in-law. Hell, I was even in DeMolay when I was a youth. I still know the secret handshake. That doesn't mean that I am part of any conspiracy.

Are you really ignorant enough to believe that any intelligent civilization would build structures on the surface of the moon? Do you realize how many meteors have hit the moon? Mars has some 43,000 craters and it hasn't been hit nearly as many times as the moon. Mars has several discernible caves on its surface. If man ever puts a station there, that is probably where they will put it, as Mars has ferocious wind and dust storms and still gets hit with a considerable amount of meteoroids. The atmosphere there simply isn't thick enough to protect the surface,as Earths is. The moon has no atmosphere, thus no protection.

Please don't let science and logic get in the way of your fantasy. If you want to pound your pud at night thinking about aliens, be my guest. Perhaps one day, you will get tired of playing Peter Pan and decide to grow up.

BTW, now that your ugly step-sister,S2D is gone, you are all alone with no one to inflate your ego and agree with you.

Do you not take into consideration that these structures, if they do exist, could be very old? That at a time in the distant past life did exist on the moon, and Mars?

As for religious implications... I am not talking about the scientists, I am more concerned with the founders and elite, high ranking officials, who control where this information goes, who hears about it, what media reports it, etc...

What about political implications? These days the evangelical Christianity movement seems to be VERY connected with the right wing neo-conservative zealots, you disagree?

Just something to think about.

By the way Pops this has nothing to do with ego, at least you give me good reasons to not agree with me... I am not looking for people to agree with me, just a good intellectual discussion...

Beez
:rasta:
 

Pops

Resident pissy old man
Veteran
One further point: Whoever thinks that the U.S. can control the weather by 2025 is either a freaking moron or the most optimistic person in the country. The technology to control the earth's rotation, the gravity of the moon and solar flares from the sun just doesn't exist, even in science fiction.
 

Pops

Resident pissy old man
Veteran
The evangelical Christians ARE the the right wing neo-conservative zealots, not just connected to them.

If you want good intellectual discussions, I suggest that you post something intellectual and not the drivel that you have been posting. Do you post this crap as a school project so that we supply all your facts and you don't have to do any homework. If so, you are smarter than I gave you credit for.
 

Babombeez

Active member
Pops said:
One further point: Whoever thinks that the U.S. can control the weather by 2025 is either a freaking moron or the most optimistic person in the country. The technology to control the earth's rotation, the gravity of the moon and solar flares from the sun just doesn't exist, even in science fiction.

"In this regard, nanotechnology could be utilized to create clouds of tiny smart particles. Atmospherically buoyant, these ultra-small computer particles could navigate themselves to block optical sensors. Alternatively, they might be used to provide an atmospheric electrical potential difference -- a way to precisely aim and time lightning strikes over the enemy’s head – thereby concoct thunderbolts on demand.

Perhaps that’s too far out for some. But some blue sky thinkers have already looked into these and other scenarios in "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025" – a research paper written by a seven person team of military officers and presented in 1996 as part of a larger study dubbed Air Force 2025."

-------------------------------

Ever heard of cloud seeding? Aluminum particles in the air make it rain, pretty trippy though....

I was using this to illustrate how NASA is seen as an asset to the DOD, and other defense agencies... they lend a helping hand with satellites and other instruments, those sly bastards...

Beez
 
Top