okwildfire
Active member
haha i just noticed that aswell!!! lolThe American said:S2D in case you're unaware,you are the only one that can see your replies apparently.I hate to see you keep wasting your time.
haha i just noticed that aswell!!! lolThe American said:S2D in case you're unaware,you are the only one that can see your replies apparently.I hate to see you keep wasting your time.
The American said:S2D in case you're unaware,you are the only one that can see your replies apparently.I hate to see you keep wasting your time.
Pops said:Well, S2D is still around as he just gave me neg rep for my last post. I guess he feels he owes me one for reporting his bigotry. Gee, another 1135 neg reps and I will be down to zero. We can't see him, but he can still reach out and bite us. Maybe he is the Great Galactic Ghoul.
Pops said:American, there have been so many folks who have stuck it up your butt, that you could drive a VolksWagen up your ass with the doors open and not get any shit on the paint.
newbgrow said:Thank you. Pops already corrected me on that.
In your previous post, you criticized the amount of dust in the Martian atmosphere in photos you've seen, so you cannot deny "dust" was part of your reasoning, even if you did not say the exact words "adds dust..." You have said time and time again that NASA was trying to give the impression of "no life" by making reddish, low contrast photos; however, the pictures I've posted from the NASA domain directly contradicts what you were saying. In the first pic, they admitted Mars had reddish rocks, but a greenish tinge in the sky. Whatever they were "dramatizing" obviously isn't very well orchestrated. Even after all this it's moot point, because
Both pictures show no life whatsoever. High contrast photographs do not make life. Water does. Both pictures show dry land and no signs of life at all. Your theory of NASA trying to hide life is a stretch at best, absolutely ridiculous at worst.