You have provided NO EVIDENCE.Right, for all those who doubted hempy an him saying that what bushweed sells as mm x thai78 is not his thai.....to those who doubted wally nolands whose information came directly from nevil..with wally also saying bushys mmthai78 dont have hempys thai but infact has a thai in that at the time charles reeferman had that was know as swiss thai (not thai82)....an the information that nevil himself gave was he had 2 different 78thais...one hempys thia78....an the other from reef a swiss thai thai78.....those who want the proof an the story of the thai used in the mmthai78 that bushy sell an has in pure form himself too(wich looks nothing like hempys an is a faster flowering than hempys too)....well go insta...look up reefermangenetics (the guys who took over all of reefs stock he held at that time he was their an left)..look for the picture of a small thai seedling with a few true leaves...post labbled by them as pre 78 thai....wich was actually a thai collected by a fella in 1978 from Thailand..was taken to Germany for a few years an then made its way to Switzerland....an then finally to Charles...who sent the 78thai, thai82 an one other I think was 68/69 thai to nevil..so there is the evidence for everyone who doubted hempy an wally nolands an nevil on there being two 78thais an both in the possession of nevil when making these strains. Hempys thai was used privately by nevil once all the testing an selecting was done which was the part mostly what was seen publicly an being the part the seeds that are mostly out there are from. The actually core of the project nevil was doing once he had found, selected, built, an fine tuned the specific parents plants he wanted to really work with is mostly unreleased....anyway thought it would be nice for people to know a bit about the thai in bushys mmthai78
You just typed a story on the internet saying that you know things.
That is simply NOT EVIDENCE.
WHAT don't you understand about that?
Donald posted above this post that he had screen shots of his conversation with REEF where he contradicts what you and Hempy claim Nevil got from Reef.
Screen shots of posts from the actual players in this drama are evidence.
Hempy posting that "Nevil told me . . . " can only be considered evidence if the people reading his statement trust or believe the person making the claim. It's not like he's making a sworn deposition here.
Yeah, that was just cloud talk, man.
The Simpsons (1989) - S01E08 Comedy clip with quote Yeah, that was just cloud talk, man. Yarn is the best search for video clips by quote. Find the exact moment in a TV show, movie, or music video you want to share. Easily move forward or backward to get to the perfect clip.
getyarn.io
I don't trust Hempy to tell the truth about that because he has OBVIOUS conflicts of interest and benefits from his version of the story.
If he was saying something that was contrary to his personal interests, it would be more believable as an unsupported statement.
I know nothing at all about you TDS, but your associations also suggest you have conflicts of interest, so I also have zero confidence in your version of a story that is not supported anywhere else by actual evidence.
On top of that, it defies common sense to think that Nev would run a breeding project with hundreds of different strains, where out of the long list he decided to use the same name for 2 different lines.
The same name.
The glove does not fit . . . (probably not the best example <g>)
Come awn man . . . put in a bit of effort to support your claim.
Find/redact some PMs from Nev where he says it (if you got em.) Find some posts from Reef if you've seen them.
You know . . . introduce some actual evidence.
THEN you can refer to it in making your argument.