Y
Yard dog
See, that's why it's abstract. I've not been wronged in any way, because I have an open policy on genetics.
Phillthy and I discussed this until we both turned purple. The conclusion: It's stupid to set yourself up for emotional conflict or controversy over things you really have no control over. The better option for the sake of ones mental health, , is just to let people have free reign, otherwise you are just setting the stage for conflict to exist.
To take it one step further, no one owns the plant. That notion has been fought against more than any other. The proliferation of cannabis was paramount to the core premise of overgrowing prohibition.
I think, in time, life catches up with everyone and eventually, whether we like it or not, there comes a time to crawl into a ditch and die or spend money to continue existing. It's hard to look at something you have dedicated your life to and then to realize you have nothing to show for it. Genetics, have become a means of establishing identity. For creating reputation. For elevating oneself above others. Ultimately, they have become an economic platform propped up by creative marketing of individual personalities.
This is exactly what cannabis use denounces. Mushrooms, will reveal that fallacy even more clearly. Entheogens, reveal to us the fabric of the universe and if we are willing, reveal to us our truest most vile self for the purpose of cleansing our spirit from that which is our own mind. Cannabis is part of that equation. For me, it IS the equation. It is medicine.
I'm realizing though, even that notion, has been manipulated and abused by others, who understand sociology. Many people have been conned by those who seek only to profit off the passion of individuals who have given their soul to strangers through a plant.
Then again, I've made this "argument" before and that is EXACTLY why I have a new signature. Because it is unfortunately relevant and appropriate.
dank.Frank
Whilst I agree with the notion of this, it does not hold true, If we looked at SamS for example his work/plants have been ripped off more than anyone, For me he did the work therefore he should be respected/acknowledged (and dare I say it paid!!).
The same as if someone has a clone from their work and they give instructions not to pass out, this should be respected.. even if your mate has the said cut and won't give it to you.. Respect them and the originator.
I presume your open policy is a sharing of genetics with no $$ gain? there's profiteers all over the show it would seem in life esp in cannabis seed production after all we have met most of them on these boards and no doubt will again.