franklyweed
New member
Unfortunately, 80% of the growers don't need this, though useful
Seems like you guys all agree that using someones seed stock is ok if you acknowledge the original breeder.
But that is not what gets everybody bent.
It's the clones gents. Someone gets a clone that wasn't supposed to be passed and breeds with it. I have Josey's Sour Dubb. I am not supposed to. Mis labled clone. So if I release an S1 I am a dickhead basically.
Any idea how much drama the Corey cut created? Wow. Oh there is an S1 being made standby for the shit slinging.
And in this clone x clone era the beef is big.
I found a bomb copper chem male. The best I have ever seen in a chem line. Who was the first guy to hear about it? GU I emailed him pics.
I am line breeding. Ever heard of it?? LOL! My current pop is 150. Still "small" I will be picking the stinkers for a terp line breed. Will take 2yrs before seeds are ready for release.
I will only sell seeds that produce 2-3 phenos. Not 127 phenos like the latest Purple Punch x GMO cross.
For me breeding is all in the males. Fem seed was a way of breeders not releasing their males. but fem x fem(poly x poly) is causing issues already. Loads of herms, N sensitivity and 127 phenos. Also Fem crosses around f8 are not looking to hot.
Modern poly's are mutating pretty bad. Another decade of this and many breeders will have garbage muddled genetics. Eventually poly x poly becomes sterile. Mule OG.
I pick very symmetrical structure in my males. I find they are always diploid.
I see a lot of talk on IG about fem only breeding. I do not believe it is a sustainable practice.
Males for the win.
If you buy Stank Bros seed, then you bought a genetic line...you own it, it is yours. Do as you wish! But if you post up your pheno options, I'll certainly help point out nuances a first time grower of these genetics might miss, to help one achieve their end goal.
At this point - you bought and paid for them - you F2'ed them, they are YOUR genetics!!! I'm super glad you are putting them to good use and letting others enjoy them as well. Much
9-21-2012
1-22-2015
I love that this thread was started because of me. I love that I have been mocked and belittled and laughed at for sticking my heels in the sand and calling crooks exactly what they are. Those who have knowingly and intentionally manipulated and lied to breeders to get access to genetics and broken their promises.
I love that NOT ONE PERSON has ever taken the time to actually figure out my own personal stance on such things.
Until recently, GOOD people had to risk their lives and their freedom to bring you all the genetics that fill you jars, your lungs, and for many of you, your bank accounts.
There has ALWAYS been an unspoken, underlying, understood RESPECT among those that have grown cannabis while under the veil of prohibition. That is how genetics got shared and things got created. Collaborative efforts among those who simply respected each other.
I have made posts and shown support for WHAT IS RIGHT. It has zero to do with my personal opinions. It has EVERYTHING to do with sticking up for those who have been wronged. How do you determine right or wrong? Simple. You talk with the breeder and you simply HONOR their wishes.
Respect and honor. The f.u.c.k. is wrong with you people these days?!
dank.Frank
@AVOH sorry for the off topic action...
@ Yard Dog Damn just shy of 20 questions!
The issue I am seeing constantly is extreme variation. Why? because when you find that special 1 in 10,000 female the chances of her being stable are about zero.
If only one plant is a keeper that, in my opinion, is not a "strain" it is just a "cross". A strain should produce consistent, stable offspring.
90% of "Breeders" are crossing clone only to clone only. And using clone only for BX.
The reason I use symmetry as a guide is because I have yet to find a poly that is. I mean all the way through flower perfect balance. I do not want to continue poly x poly breeding. Or spending $1000's on genetic testing to find diploids. Or going as far back as Landrace. So I pick symmetrical plants for at least one parent. So far so good.
Of course as you said fem x fem does not equal poly x poly always. But these days it often does.
I have two copper chem males. One is diploid one is poly. In case you didn't know you cannot breed poly out. One passes Chem 4 terps the other ChemD
I breed the dip male to poly's and the poly male to Dip females. Or dip x dip.
So never poly x poly.
And yes my stud is so great because of what he passes. I have opened up 8 new lines made with him. He passes symmetry, increases terps, and improves resin in both male and female seedlings. He is in a tent with 40 cuts right now. Test pops; then repeat the best and line breed them.
I can use him for BX's. He "cleans" up the genetics and greatly improves anything he touches. How many seed companies have you seen crush it with just 1 male? I can think of several.
I am heading "backwards" genetically to create stable offspring. All the lines I have made are quite homogenous for unworked F1's. Why? Because my male is "true breeding"
I pop seeds constantly. The only seedlings with uniformity I have grown recently come from my stock. That is just sad. I am all for a good pheno hunt but selling gear that fragmented is lame.
Just look at all the S1 clone only seeds around. Unstable crap. I do not need thiosulphate
to be successful. I have no intentions of making any fem crosses. C-Banana S1? Does that C stand for crap? No thanks.
I have a Y chromosome. So does my pollen...
It's just my opinion. Not interested in arguing my views. I have been growing cannabis for 30 years indoors. I came to this point of view with loads of practical experience.
Lost count of how many guys crossing clone only's for 3 years that tell me I am wrong lol
Time will tell.
@AVOH sorry for the off topic action...
@ Yard Dog Damn just shy of 20 questions!
The issue I am seeing constantly is extreme variation. Why? because when you find that special 1 in 10,000 female the chances of her being stable are about zero.
If only one plant is a keeper that, in my opinion, is not a "strain" it is just a "cross". A strain should produce consistent, stable offspring.
90% of "Breeders" are crossing clone only to clone only. And using clone only for BX.
The reason I use symmetry as a guide is because I have yet to find a poly that is. I mean all the way through flower perfect balance. I do not want to continue poly x poly breeding. Or spending $1000's on genetic testing to find diploids. Or going as far back as Landrace. So I pick symmetrical plants for at least one parent. So far so good.
Of course as you said fem x fem does not equal poly x poly always. But these days it often does.
I have two copper chem males. One is diploid one is poly. In case you didn't know you cannot breed poly out. One passes Chem 4 terps the other ChemD
I breed the dip male to poly's and the poly male to Dip females. Or dip x dip.
So never poly x poly.
And yes my stud is so great because of what he passes. I have opened up 8 new lines made with him. He passes symmetry, increases terps, and improves resin in both male and female seedlings. He is in a tent with 40 cuts right now. Test pops; then repeat the best and line breed them.
I can use him for BX's. He "cleans" up the genetics and greatly improves anything he touches. How many seed companies have you seen crush it with just 1 male? I can think of several.
I am heading "backwards" genetically to create stable offspring. All the lines I have made are quite homogenous for unworked F1's. Why? Because my male is "true breeding"
I pop seeds constantly. The only seedlings with uniformity I have grown recently come from my stock. That is just sad. I am all for a good pheno hunt but selling gear that fragmented is lame.
Just look at all the S1 clone only seeds around. Unstable crap. I do not need thiosulphate
to be successful. I have no intentions of making any fem crosses. C-Banana S1? Does that C stand for crap? No thanks.
I have a Y chromosome. So does my pollen...
It's just my opinion. Not interested in arguing my views. I have been growing cannabis for 30 years indoors. I came to this point of view with loads of practical experience.
Lost count of how many guys crossing clone only's for 3 years that tell me I am wrong lol
Time will tell.
I am a little confused by the use of the term "poly" here? I took it as polyhybrid but with you stating diploid (which to my knowledge cannabis mostly is).. Are you saying you have natural polyploids in the population?
I think that maybe there should be an offical thread where breeders and cultivators can come and actually write up ideas and policies that actually put some sort of balance to who puts what name genetics or maybe even if they want there line to be out crossed or crossed ethically.
How do you know this? Polyploidy is a relatively rare occurance and cannabis is typically diploid in keeping with most other organisms. Do you have any evidence to back up this statement?Many, infact most, American genetics are Polyploid. Thats why there are so many mutations and phenotypes.
How do you know this? Polyploidy is a relatively rare occurance and cannabis is typically diploid in keeping with most other organisms. Do you have any evidence to back up this statement?
DF~
I don't know the scoop on who wronged you...
.....no one owns the plant.......
dank.Frank
It's hard to look at something you have dedicated your life to and then to realize you have nothing to show for it. Genetics, have become a means of establishing identity. For creating reputation. For elevating oneself above others. Ultimately, they have become an economic platform propped up by creative marketing of individual personalities.
manipulated and abused by others, who understand sociology. Many people have been conned by those who seek only to profit off the passion of individuals who have given their soul to strangers through a plant.
dank.Frank