Whats the nutrient composition or ppm of n-p-k of veg+bloom vs 6/9 at standard ratios?
8-5-13 for v+b...6/9, I haven't a clue.
Whats the nutrient composition or ppm of n-p-k of veg+bloom vs 6/9 at standard ratios?
8-5-13 for v+b...6/9, I haven't a clue.
Thanks but I mean more specifically the elemental
Breakdown as far as total nitrogen phosphorus potassium magnesium and calcium ppm at standard dose to compare to the 6/9 or Lucas?
6/9 is the lucas formula & you do realize that its only good for flower & really isn't all that good either . it lacks so much that it just isn't worth using anymore , plants need so much more than that formula offers .
its a good base for newbies to start off using if you have no clue about nutrient values .
dans, i do know that 6/9 is the lucas formula.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]N 97
P 60
K 105
Mg 41
S 27
Ca 97
[/FONT]im asking for the elemental ppm or breakdown of veg+bloom brother for comparisons sake
So your saying there abolutely no way to calculate the elemental ppm breakdown of it, at say 5grams a gallon? Or how would i go about calculating it?6/9 is a "standard dose", or set ratio of GH or GH type nutrients. There is no "standard dose" of v+b. It's entirely strain/system dependent.
So your saying there abolutely no way to calculate the elemental ppm breakdown of it, at say 5grams a gallon? Or how would i go about calculating it?
EZ, do those numbers include the Shine and /or PUSH addition, or is it just the 5 grams per gallon of V+B base?
View Image
here is a better comparrison of my hydrobuddy results and Ez Riders results for 5 gram/gallon.
View Image
and an example of the hand calcs.
V+B has 10% calcium w/w
10(%Ca) x 10= 100 ppm Ca from one gram per liter
3.785 liters in a gallon, so
100/3.785= 26.4 ppm Ca from one gram per gallon
26.4 x 5 = 132 ppm Calcium from 5 grams V+B per gallon.
It has a high amount of calcium. Curious why others have to add cal mag if it really has what it states it has?
I've often wondered this myself. I'm finding that experienced users are mostly just adding epsoms for extra Mg. I believe the problem arises from ca/mg mostly being sold as one product. Many growers see them as the same element. IMO, the surest sign you're feeding too light with v+b is if you see a ca deficiency. Ca is usually the first to show in my experience...YMMV. I'd also like to add that since I've switched from HPS to CMH lighting, my plants seem to be more Mg hungry. Again, YMMV.