-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Advancing Eco Agriculture, Product Science
- Thread starter FatherEarth
- Start date
Jidoka,
You all can use any lab you want. It is pretty clear that from your results, that you don't guide your fertilization on the basis of analysis anyways.
The idea that the density is screwing up the results is your opinion. Science says otherwise. If what you are thinking is true, that the density of your soil is giving you bad calculations, what is the implication? You are going to put on more fertilizer then? Really?
You all can use any lab you want. It is pretty clear that from your results, that you don't guide your fertilization on the basis of analysis anyways.
The idea that the density is screwing up the results is your opinion. Science says otherwise. If what you are thinking is true, that the density of your soil is giving you bad calculations, what is the implication? You are going to put on more fertilizer then? Really?
caterpillar710
Member
I know I haven't found the point of diminishing returns yet with some inputs ...got some new toys to play with in my sand box
I have been using Logan for all these years without density info. I don't see how you think that is the issue at all. The issue is which lab is more accurate using their own techniques. I see two wildly different sets of numbers...which is correct, I got no clue.
And if by fertilizer you mean I am going to apply more P and Ca then you are correct...I am.
And if by fertilizer you mean I am going to apply more P and Ca then you are correct...I am.
lmao
this coming from the guy who only looks at the pictures
Some great pictures in the original article. Check it out!
"The effect of root media...."
https://goo.gl/drwtMe
Have you ever actually asked Logan about their procedure? To my understanding they measure with a scoop as well. LMAO.
caterpillar710
Member
Logan must use a bigger scoop because their numbers are realistic , gotten a few tests from spectrum and they're just muddying the water
I think the only one using a bigger scoop here is you when you are dabbing.... LMAO.
Hella huge dabs that would kill mortals, shifts the earth's center of gravity lmao.
I was trying to do the math on those spectrum vs logan and after a bit I said fuck this. Might be leavin something on the table, might not. Having a stack of logan results and improving every time is a good place to be. Switch and not improve would be tragic
On adding more ferts....hell ya drive some energy
I was trying to do the math on those spectrum vs logan and after a bit I said fuck this. Might be leavin something on the table, might not. Having a stack of logan results and improving every time is a good place to be. Switch and not improve would be tragic
On adding more ferts....hell ya drive some energy
jidoka's clay mix didn't react at all the the fizz test. Maybe one bubble. BAS fizzed pretty well, and my native soil was like a mentos in a diet coke.
caterpillar710
Member
Were those hydrocloric dabs tasty?
I like OG kush live rosin dabs
I like OG kush live rosin dabs
No it was not. I liked the kush a whole lot better
Muriatic Acid = HydroChloric Acid + Water, which by the way is mildly explosive if you try it yourself....
caterpillar710
Member
I'll make sure to take note
caterpillar710
Member
K acetate works 60% better than k2so4 so adjust dosage accordingly
