frankborelli
Member
Interesting....
Can't wait to see your final thoughts on all of this Blaze...
Can't wait to see your final thoughts on all of this Blaze...
People are only interested in seeing which produces the goods.. a 4oow LED v 400w HPS would give us a clearer picture as to how LED perform on a watt for watt basis - i also think it would be beneficial for companies shifting these lights.. rather than the foolish marketing strategy some have adopted e.g. comparing a 205w LED v 400w HPS.
And if LEDGirl is reading this, please don't take it out of context - it is not personal.
I like the idea of comparing a 400w led with a 400w hid that would show us the true watt for watt comparison that is the best way to get the facts.
Cause lets face it if the HID does outperform the LED well at half the wattage its kinda unfair as is, But I have to admit for being 185w roughly its sure performs well...
Have you taken a look at Hazy's thread lately? We just supplied him with a free 345W panel for a WATT FOR WATT LED VS HID grow. The 345W draws ~290W, the 205W draws ~180W, so combined that's 470W. Hazy's 400W HPS draws right around 470-480W of power, so it's already happening. That HID doesn't stand a chance LOL.
As far as the whole outperforming thing, did everyone here already forget Hazy's grow? The one where he took more or less equal sized plants and flowered them out under our 205W vs a 400W HID? In the end our 180W of LED power produced ~30g less than the 400W HID at 470-480W. So if those were his results with 300 less watts, why should yours be any different? Not to mention your LED plants started bloom larger, and with more nodes than the HID plants. If anything (based on Hazy's results) you should be worrying about that 400W HID losing by a decent margin, not whether or not the LED will match it lol. But hey, I'm just the scientist
but simply put I do agree watt for watt is the best way to test the true capability of LED lighting.
Watt for watt in the same square footage? That's going to either make average HID intensity and high LED intensity, or high HID intensity and crazy LED intensity. What kind of wpsf do you have in mind, any idea?
Gentlemen the discussion regarding comparison with like wattage lights, would not be valid for this evaluation. Let me explain, HID lights are like a shotgun with an open bore spreading shots “or light” all over the place. It puts out a very wide spectrum of light, which a good percentage of the light is not used in the process of photosynthesis by the plant. The beauty of the LED is that it can be constructed to produce a spectrum of light that is proper for maximal use by Chlorophyll A & B to provide maximal photosynthesis. If designed properly every watt of energy used by the LED is useable light for the plant, where as only 50 to 60% of the light produced by an HID bulb is useable by the plant.
A correctly designed LED light is designed to meet the requirements of Photosynthesis for the plants we love.
MedicalMan wrote...
People are only interested in seeing which produces the goods.. a 4oow LED v 400w HPS would give us a clearer picture as to how LED perform on a watt for watt basis - i also think it would be beneficial for companies shifting these lights.. rather than the foolish marketing strategy some have adopted e.g. comparing a 205w LED v 400w HPS.
And if LEDGirl is reading this, please don't take it out of context - it is not personal.
THERES NO CHANCE A LED CAN MATCH A HID HUNG VERTICALLY IN A STADIUM GROW, CANT BE DONE END OF STORY.
THERES NO CHANCE A LED CAN MATCH A HID HUNG VERTICALLY IN A STADIUM GROW, CANT BE DONE END OF STORY.
and get a nice amount circularly grown pop corn fart air buds, atleast the light cost 800 dollars right.