looks pretty even. All very healthy and lush.
Yeah its about time to see how the leds hold up in flower looking good so far!
looks pretty even. All very healthy and lush.
I think you are mistaken here Pet, as an increase in lumens doesn't change the spectral output of the bulb. A HPS from Hortilux (regardless of wattage) emits the same spectrum as the next, the only difference is how much light it puts out in that spectrum. So perhaps you meant "the ideal intensity", but even then you're going to have a very hard time coming up with any data to support your claim. Plenty of people do amazing things with 250W and 400W HPS lights. Take VerdantGreen for example...
It's rated to compare to a 400W HID, although for some our 205W could likely replace their 600W HID. Either way, if there is a test you want to see (if you feel this one isn't good enough), then DO IT! Don't just sit around and complain waiting for someone else to take up the cause. It's not like you weren't talking with me about getting LED's in the past, but because I wouldn't go as cheap as your eBay UFO you went elsewhere... It's easy to see via our side by side grow comparisons, that when purchasing a LED you get what you pay for, or we wouldn't have smashed Haight Solid State, beaten ProSource, or made HIDHut look underdeveloped... So please stop the speculation unless you're going to "put your money where your mouth is" and show us the grow you want to see with the lights you want to test.
blazeoneup check the link - irishboy pulled 546 from a 740w LED. Probably surpass 1g/w if he went the hydro route.
http://forum.grasscity.com/indoor-grow-journals/545221-irish-boys-glh-600w-led-grow.html
546 grams (umm, did anyone notice how 1 day before he weighed them, he was telling everyone how they all needed a lot more drying time?) from 749W = .73 grams per watt. What's REALLY funny about this grow, is that Irish used training/LST techniquest to try and increase his yields. The reason this is funny, is because he did .78 grams per watt with our 1st generation 126W light, using absolutely NO training or yield maximization methods, and that was several months ago (you're supposed to get better with each grow ya know). Our 2nd gens perform better than our first, and had he used training/LST with our light, he most certainly would have been over 1 gram per watt without switching to hydro. The company who makes the light he was using has a crap product and Irish proved it. It's too bad other people are so blind to see it, not to mention the buds he produced with that 750W LED are about half the size as some produced by independents using a single 126W light. In the end he did BETTER WITH OUR 1st GEN 126W WITH ZERO TRAINING, than he did with a 750W LED and training it up the yin yang. OUCH.
MedicalMan.. I am currently living in Shenzhen China.. Where 95% of the LED grow lights are manufactured. I have also visited several factories and can tell you that even though the outside me look the same the guts of these lights can be very different. Some even manufacture their own LED's to their customers specifications. After much research into the subject I have had 4 x 300 watt systems manufactured to my specifications. Much of what LEDGirl has said about her lights is very true. Personally I have only one concern with her spec's and she is using a 60 degree lens.. Now most that you can buy off the internet are 120 degree.. which I agree is to broad of a light dispersion but at the same time I think that 60 degree is narrow. I have chosen to go with a 90 degree lens and with 4 bands of light.. with the primary lights being of 440nm and 660nm with the ability to switch of the blue LEDS for flowering. 440nm and 660nm tracks the peaks of Chlorophyll A photosynthesis at their peak absorption.
If you look at the plants in the most recent photos posted by Blaze showing the two plants side by side at 14 days of 12 x 12 lighting you see a very distinct difference in the color of the leaves between the two plants. I am not really sure what to make of this, the LED plants still project the same coloration as they did while still in the vegetation cycle. Where the HID images show a deeper green almost purple green, HID lamps produce very little light in the 400nm to 500nm spectrum and the HPS is even much less. Will be interesting to see how this plays out..
good job blaze. just what i have expected. led for veg and hps flower i think would be an great combo.too bad their so expensive
LEDGirl, not every post on LED lighting is a contest between yourself and competing companies.There are LED's on ebay that will perform just as well - people will make their own choice without you stuffing nonsense down their throat.... it becomes somewhat repetitive and tiresome.
As for LED lighting itself - ALL LED lighting originates in the far east, namely China. If you try saying different you are full of crap.
Most companies simply import LED lighting from Chinese suppliers then stick their logo on it
Sorry for the distraction Blazeoneup, but that needed to be put straight.
2 weeks into flower and you've called it already?
also remember that the LED is half the wattage of the HPS...
Who cares if all LED lighting originates from the same place? What makes the difference is the specific LEDs used and the combination they're used in. For the amount of shit you're talking it doesn't seem like you're very educated about LED growing.
LEDGirl isn't stuffing nonsense down anyone's throat... you're the one that came in here with a link to another forum showing a grower using a completely different LED setup. All she did was make a distinction between their LEDs and hers. If you were genuinely interested you would've seen that LEDGirl has addressed just about everything you've mentioned before.
Indeed as i pointed out to wg1750. The point is this; some people state that others shouldn't buy LED lighting from ebay as they are knock offs from China - as for being educated in LED i suppose i know as much as the next guy
Look, i couldn't care less if it was a completely different LED setup that i posted... it was a link intended for Blazeoneup, to show how decent that LED grow turned out. LEDGirl then turned my post into a marketing campaign... which i have no interest in - that's what i meant by nonsense. And yes, it is total bollox nonsense.
Hope that clears things up. No offense intended.
I won't reply to anything more as this thread belongs to Blazeoneup.
I have had my share of private messages with LEDGirl not much chatting more related to the LEDLight I recieved, I have come to this conclusion she is money motivated as with any other company, However she is also heart set on producing a quality light which lives up to the potential. She isnt trying to slap crap together and sell it and make a profit she is trying to produce a quality product that works as advertised and make some coin in the proccess. There is nothing wrong with that, I kinda wish she wouldn't have rubbed so many the wrong way. It makes it hard for people to open their minds to facts when they have a clouded judgement based on feelings towards her in general.
So yeah I get this reputation as said, all due to worthless trolls who were stirring up shit and creating a double standard, much like MedMan was trying to do just now on your thread.