xtsho
Well-known member
War has been going on since the beginning of mankind. It's nothing new that any US political party started. There will always be conflicts around the globe.
-
ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
2024 US Presidential Election
War has been going on since the beginning of mankind. It's nothing new that any US political party started. There will always be conflicts around the globe.
we have a nasty habit of "returning to sender" things like that...
LOL! he WILL get some Hispanic votes, because they are the fastest growing segment of religiously inclined. i doubt he's going to get enough to help him avoid prison though. LOCK HIM UP!
moose eater
Well-known member
That's why I used the term Congress, but it was GW who started an open-ended war that didn't even so much as target a specific country. A war on a movable concept or idea with connotative definition.. One that can be defined and redefined by a variety of people in many ways. Mobile goal posts.
"A war on terror."
I'm probably one of the people furthest from partisanism you're apt to meet, but I also can identify rightful blame fairly accurately without being member to the opposition.
moose eater
Well-known member
Yep, a part of our hypocrisy and sense of entitlement as a nation is to expect the right to do unto others, often without proper legal authority, what we refuse to accept them doing. Fathom that!!we have a nasty habit of "returning to sender" things like that...
LOL! he WILL get some Hispanic votes, because they are the fastest growing segment of religiously inclined. i doubt he's going to get enough to help him avoid prison though. LOCK HIM UP!
Kinda' like our referring other nations to the ICJ, but refusing their (that court's) jurisdiction over our crimes.
That's a sort of hypocrisy that only goes down the road so far before breaking down entirely. At which time a whole bunch of mindless idiots scratch their heads and ask, "How/why did that happen?"
Last edited:
xtsho
Well-known member
Harris heavily favored over Trump among Hispanic Catholic voters, EWTN News/RealClear poll finds
Harris heavily favored over Trump among Hispanic Catholic voters
Released on Sept. 5, the EWTN News/RealClear poll takes a deep dive into Catholic religious and political practices across the U.S.
www.catholicnewsagency.com
Hiddenjems
Well-known member
If there are no undecided voters, the polls would never move, at all.
Hiddenjems
Well-known member
While I’m not a supporter of 90% of his policy, I would love to see him destroy all government secrets. However I doubt they would let that happen.
How does a government by the people for the people and of the people justify classifying secrets?
right
Well-known member
Black and Hispanic voters may favor Harris ,but the democrats need just about all of them for the win . This is infact a big dealView attachment 19060747
Harris heavily favored over Trump among Hispanic Catholic voters, EWTN News/RealClear poll finds
Harris heavily favored over Trump among Hispanic Catholic voters
Released on Sept. 5, the EWTN News/RealClear poll takes a deep dive into Catholic religious and political practices across the U.S.
right
Well-known member
Yes Moose Eater
When did the democratic party become the party of censorship. When did the democrats stop representing the little guy , the working man .( should the proletariat have to pay for the Bourgeois higher education. )
The democrats could defend the war.
George W. I was a lifelong dem . But now ? When did the democratic party become the party of unending war.
When did the democratic party become the party of censorship. When did the democrats stop representing the little guy , the working man .( should the proletariat have to pay for the Bourgeois higher education. )
The democrats could defend the war.
moose eater
Well-known member
File that under the category of people who believe they'll never get caught, or who believe their positions are so important that their crimes don't matter. Some of that being natural fruit of Oligarchy. "Too big to fail" kind of stuff. That, or delusions of grandeur lacking in a decent quality mirror.
moose eater
Well-known member
Parties and political aggregates have flipped or betrayed platforms many times throughout our relatively brief 250-year history; some of this is easily seen/found in reading.
But the corporate Dems, which account for the majority of Dems these days, still try to sell themselves via their marketing as the party of the working man or what I refer to as "the Commoners', while catering -heavily- to corporate America/Wall St.
The question is, who among the voters is willing to put their party jerseys and related corporate sponsorship aside, scratch the surface and look harder or deeper, versus accepting soundbites in between evening soaps, televised sports events, or political speeches written by handlers, based on poll-counters, and presented in B- or C-grade quality of sincerity by those who claim to have the vision to lead us out of the mire.
Nationalism is way popular now. And nationalism invites all sorts of unholy bullshit. Look at the double-standards that fly even in this thread, with many not even seemingly aware of their bizarre nationalist entitlement thinking.
Last edited:
RobFromTX
Well-known member
And theres so much more to go
moose eater
Well-known member
Nationalize weapons development and manufacturing industries where national/military needs or wants are concerned. And other DoD contractors, as well, giving bonuses for innovation, getting rid of the legalized theft and serial mass murder that has gone on therein for decades upon decades. Sentence those who create illegal war to death at Leavenworth, regardless of what office they held. And stop making such things so profitable. For anyone. It's never been profitable for those we kill based on lies, or for the kids coming home in boxes.
Last edited:
