Give me a little time and I'll explain how I do it. Most won't agree, and that's quite all right.Almost no talk about male selection process, how it impacts progeny.
Me either here its a combo of structure and surviving the testing.Give me a little time and I'll explain how I do it. Most won't agree, and that's quite all right.
I'll give you a hint, it doesn't have anything to do with microscopic analysis of resin globules or a scratch and sniff of the main stem.
is that called natural selection?Me either here its a combo of structure and surviving the testing.
Thought I had a good candidate this year but the dogs ate him first day after being put in the ground
An example would be a breeder finding a great plant but 2 guys before him used a hermi heavy line or something and he just accidentally perpetuated the oopsies...self the wrong plant and whole line is fkt
Yeah but that doesn't mean it's the right way to go Or that even the breeder got there the right way. that plant is beautiful but it could also be messed up that's what makes them special they're one in a million.999000 plants suck
Science data...im on record, there is no wrong way, just wrong execution. It's ok to self a plant and continue line breeding as long as forebears are stable and breeder knows what the plant should do..that's the right 'execution' imoLet me ask you something. If at the end of the day, our goal is to breed plants with the highest terpene profiles and highest cannabinoid profiles, to get the best affect, who decides the right and wrong way to get there?
Science data...im on record, there is no wrong way, just wrong execution. It's ok to self a plant and continue line breeding as long as forebears are stable and breeder knows what the plant should do..that's the right 'execution' imo
I can make you a super thiol producing monster...just need data...how i get there could implement any technique. So long as the data says, yeah go that direction to keep [insert important gene]