Again I think the evidence has demonstrated that prices have come off the bottom! Furthermore; water issues, pest & disease, compliance checks etc... Make it far more difficult than the past to pull off large scale!
you coming down to the la cup prop?
fair enough.Well, mainly because the stuff makes a huge difference in finished quality. The amount that is used is the equivalent of about $8 per light per cycle even buying the smaller bottles, I imagine that it would cost significantly less when purchased by the 100's of gallons.
I would think in order to fully replicate it's results you would need to have it analyzed and reproduced exactly. which would carry a significant cost and also take time. I'm all for this route if it is in fact cost effective over a given period of time. I know that one of the main things in the final is triacontanol, but beyond that I don't have much of a clue.
it's used @ 3.8ml/gal for 14 days so each light would use 266ml per run assuming you're feeding 5gal per light per day(which in my experience is more than necessary). so yeah looking at 70gal for one run @ 1000kw @ a retail price of around $100/gal...definitely enough to be using something produced in house if possible...but if it in house production is not feasible I personally wouldn't hesitate to spend the 7k on the stuff...but it's just a product that I swear by. also fwiw I wouldn't consider one product accounting for 75% of overhead unless that product is power.
I'll end with this- try it and get back to me
Again I think the evidence has demonstrated that prices have come off the bottom! Furthermore; water issues, pest & disease, compliance checks etc... Make it far more difficult than the past to pull off large scale!
Elmer... it's more like being in the possession of Jack and Beanstalk seeds...
GROWMORE #1 ...quit over paying for NPK