shiva82
Well-known member
Much like the average narcissist, no self-awareness or admission about what MIGHT have led up to October 7th.
Bibi, fuck right off.
october the 7th was staged . as usual . there is no hostages. just agents
Much like the average narcissist, no self-awareness or admission about what MIGHT have led up to October 7th.
Bibi, fuck right off.
I think it's been about 76 years since anyone needed to stage anything for someone to hate the state of Israel. Hamas wasn't onboard until 1987/1988. The Nakba? West Bank 'settlements'? Murdering and/or raping Palestinians with impunity? Shooting little kids for throwing stones at tanks? Rachel Corrie? Peace Flotilla? Yeah, maybe there've been decades of reasons to hate Israel before Hamas ever came to be? Tail wagging the dog much?
Odd how some can come together to mutually loathe boundary-challenged, rampaging, thieving, murdering bullies who abuse their power and protection from a Super Power for 3/4 of a century+, isn't it? What on earth are those people thinking when they properly identify the abuser in a given situation?
Of course, there will still continue to be those who claim neutrality and 'both-sides-isms', despite the overwhelming evidence of the fallacy of this in any metric, but whose willful blindness makes another statement altogether.
There's a good reason some are on ignore.
People who are blind to their own bullshit rarely sit at my table. People who deflect when they've been lethargic and minimally true to their words never sit at my table.
every able bodied man in this thread would be violent if zionists stole their homes and bulldozed their still living families. you're living in some deluded fantasy if you think otherwise, and you know this, which is why you never answered my hypothetical question.In case you have been too obsessed with labeling others, I think both sides are violent and they wish to remain so.
and you are simply wrong for the millionth time. israel killed tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands from 1947-1986 before hamas was even chartered in 1987. israel has killed more palestinian civilians since oct 7 than hamas has ever killed civilians + combatants.I simply pointed out that Hamas is equally bloodthirsty
should people who commit genocide and war crimes be brought to justice? should they be put to death?and that crying out for more death is exactly the same thing that Hamas and Israel are doing.
every able bodied man in this thread would be violent if zionists stole their homes and bulldozed their still living families. you're living in some deluded fantasy if you think otherwise, and you know this, which is why you never answered my hypothetical question.
and you are simply wrong for the millionth time. israel killed tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands from 1947-1986 before hamas was even chartered in 1987. israel has killed more palestinian civilians since oct 7 than hamas has ever killed civilians + combatants.
should people who commit genocide and war crimes be brought to justice? should they be put to death?
"Equally bloodthirsty"= bullshit.
Only one is living on another's land. Only one is killing and raping without restraint. Only one is armed and protected by a Superpower.
Yes, and yes, but such a policy would scare the shit out of the US and it's 'cleaner' allies, might result in more soldiers refusing unlawful orders as provided fo0r in the UCMJ, and would piss off the DoD to the core.should people who commit genocide and war crimes be brought to justice? should they be put to death?
Yes, it was foolish of me to agree to that statement.I disagree with that assessment.
I think Hamas wanted to trade Israeli hostages for their terms or conditions involving an Israeli-free Gaza and West Bank..
Israel's Hannibal directive has been applied to IDF, et al, not necessarily civilians. I suspect involving Israeli citizens in an unleashing of the Hannibal directive surprised Hamas, as much as it did others.
I doubt very much that they intended for Gaza to be leveled and still not get their freedom from Israel's boot on their throats.
Israel being more isolated via the world's loathing of their criminal actions and history, doesn't mean that the US will allow Israel to receive the consequences they should have received many years ago, or that the US will stop wiping Bibi's ass for him.
I seriously doubt Hamas intended for the majority of their homeland to be leveled or for a significant percentage of their population to be murdered. The remainder of the saner world's condemnation of Israel won't get for the Palestinians or Hamas what they wanted.
Yes, it was foolish of me to agree to that statement.
I think Hamas had expected Israel’s disproportionate response and the killing of civilians. I believe they would have hoped for Israel to lose international support - perhaps even to come under pressure from the US.
But for most of Gaza to be razed? No, who would have expected that?
For Netanyahu to have no interest in seeing the hostages returned? No, who would have expected that.
Regarding US aid:
“In recent years, some U.S. and Israeli analysts have said that U.S. aid to Israel should be reevaluated because Israel is now a wealthy country—the fourteenth richest per capita—with one of the most advanced militaries in the world.”
U.S. Aid to Israel in Four Charts
Israel has long been the leading recipient of U.S. foreign aid, including military support. That aid has come under heightened scrutiny amid Israel’s monthslong war to eliminate Hamas.www.cfr.org
But for the US to withhold its veto protection? Short of Israel building gas chambers, I don’t see it.
But for the US to withhold its veto protection? Short of Israel building gas chambers, I don’t see it.
I doubt that’s it, otherwise the UN as a whole would share the same view.Why on Earth would that be?
We could see it being prudent, if we were as shortsighted as to think that Palestine would cease to appease other Arabs into a holy war.
Perhaps people believe that both sides are not equally as passionate... or as provocative.
And no, no holy war either.
Such a strong argument. You’ve really made an effort.
Is there a clause that says it's okay to storm neighborhoods, killing, raping, and kidnapping?