MIA and/or wounded, those are part of the typical stats for casualties
War
- Thread starter Creeperpark
- Start date
Corpselover Fat
Active member
MIA certainly (dead), and some of them severely wounded so they haven't gotten their pardons yet? Many of 26 000 pardoned are probably wounded too. Absolutely crazy numbers in any case. The regular Russian forces suffered a lot of casualties in Bakhmut too...
I am in favour of something more along the lines of the old athenian democracy, a meritocracy where far from any idiot could hold office and vote in elections. The foundation would be on the nation state, making it compatible with the emerging multipolar world order but not your rules based order. There would be a socialist government focused on protecting the national interests against american parasitism and cultural influence, essentially. So a complete detachment from the democracy of today, where stupid is considered smart and so on is the type of governmet I am for.
They never had any launch codes buddy, but it is a common talkingpoint among ukranian propagandists. I think you will be pleased to hear there are rumors the US already sent a tactical nuke to Ukraine, and that Russian forces seized it in Gostomel.
Don’t you ever stop to think about the consequences that could come from playing such games with an opponent who will dominate in any escalation that you can come up with?
as has been done many times in other wars, creative accounting is a 'secret' weapon
They say he is a vegetable, and not only that but also his position was given away by the drug addict of Kiev who apparently have become paranoid from wearing the same shirt all day, every day.
A summary of the statement regarding operation Bakhmut meat grinder and its goal, not to take the city but to make it into the graveyard of the AFU.
GenghisKush
Well-known member
LOL at @ "they never had any launch codes"
Not because I think it's wrong, it may be true, who am I to say?
But because it's dumb. There is no question that Ukraine had nuclear material, even if it was only as components to weapons controlled by "launch codes." With just a scrap of ingenuity and the plutonium, any modern industrialized country could put an implosion non-thermonuclear weapon together, one that would certainly produce kilotons of TNT equivalent. By US foreign policy way of thinking, that was too much to risk.
Since then, Ukraine has proven itself to be very capable, and I think the US effort to promote disarmament agreements were a good idea and I'm glad the agreements exist, even if this Russian government abrogates their part of the treaty.
Not because I think it's wrong, it may be true, who am I to say?
But because it's dumb. There is no question that Ukraine had nuclear material, even if it was only as components to weapons controlled by "launch codes." With just a scrap of ingenuity and the plutonium, any modern industrialized country could put an implosion non-thermonuclear weapon together, one that would certainly produce kilotons of TNT equivalent. By US foreign policy way of thinking, that was too much to risk.
Since then, Ukraine has proven itself to be very capable, and I think the US effort to promote disarmament agreements were a good idea and I'm glad the agreements exist, even if this Russian government abrogates their part of the treaty.
Me too, but with a healthy taste of consensus
greyfader
Well-known member
thank you for answering! it's funny that you speak of the athenian city state as i was reading up on that last week. 6th century bc.
"Don’t you ever stop to think about the consequences that could come from playing such games with an opponent who will dominate in any escalation that you can come up with?"
by this, you must mean the US!
Point is they ”owned those nukes” as much as Italy owns american nukes on US military bases in Italy. And yes Ukraine had nuclear material, about 240 billion USD worth in Zaporozhye that is now in russian hands along with sensitive US Westinghouse technology.
Had not only material and technology but declared intent to use it.
Brother Nature
Well-known member
I doubt there will be enough of a population to support a military after the nuclear fallout from this war...
"i ask, sir, what is the militia? it is the whole people except for a few public officials." - George Mason
no, they won't have the type of military they "thought" they had now, but...
Well that's the end of this thread.
Congratulations commies! I hope you enslave the people who were calling their fellow Americans Communists the past few years reminding them that this is what they wanted and that they are now Communists as well.... they're sure to get a kick out of it.
Seems as if you have not.
If those aren't age old words....
So you support the butcher over the defender?
Destroying people isn't the actual goal of war....
Soldiers aren't taught that... but officers know.
Let's pretend you can grow up, or at least pretend that you can imagine rising above your current rank.
A search on the supposed statement yielded nothing but last years warnings by Lavrov, but add the word meme to the search and your meme pops up. More nato troll farm garbage as expected.
Demilitarization and denazification are the stated objectives of the special military operation, what the did you think it meant? That they would roll in like Victoria Nudelman and hand out cookies to fascists who spent the last 8 years shelling civilians in Donbass?
Last edited:
Corpselover Fat
Active member
Russia is becoming inconsequential. Army depleted and humiliated. Central Asian countries move away from Russia and China humiliates Russia. Economy destroyed. Skilled workers move abroad. On path to become a North Korea and China's resource.
