Anyone ever considered that they are all the same cutting & that some of your grow it badly some grow it well. Some of you don't allow maximum stink due to the grow methodology & some just don't have the ability to get to a level of overall health to make accurate analysis of the cultivar.. Birds cheese, windows cheese, Jah's cheese, Cannabliss Cheese, Ricks cheese, Brightside cheese, suicide & the SOT are all the same cutting. I can see it.. I can see what you are all doing with it, good & bad..
I can see it.. I can see what you are all doing with it, good & bad..
I see the same phyllotaxy with slight environmental differences. Have you got a pic of them all grow side by side to show me?. I see Different cuts such as the NL BB or the Nelly sometimes I'm not criticising you I am just saying what I see..
I find it funny folks discussing cheese in this detail It's hilarious after all this time
Think what you like Blazee..
Yes got to agree 100% with what Blazeee is sayingWell said blazee,, nice work bro
Is that the bright side cut mate
Vh
I apologise Mate DaveVally Hill. It's actually called soma clonal variation. There is no genetic drift in cultivars just in varieties.. Yeah your right about G+E=P.. There is no soma clonal variation in the different cultivars, in the cheese that has been about forever it has maternal influence & that can be present for over 7-8 generations of cuttings.. So until you have had them under the same production methodology for years & years in the same media then your side by sides are moot..
I grew em in Veg for 10 year & flower side by side
Somaclonal variation is only associated with plants propagated from plant tissue culture. Since it's blatantly obvious that the cuttings in question haven't been born of tissue culture then it's absolutely irrelevant to even use that word.
You've just said cheese has maternal influence - what the fuck are you talking about? You have no idea what the traits are of the P1 mother since you didn't breed the cultivar.
Dave, please don't clog up this thread with over complication just because you want to sound cool. There is definitely value in what some here are trying to achieve. It isn't 'moot' at all.. Why not just see it as a comparison with investigation into the variance of a cultivar(s) within a similar terp signature.
I for one enjoy this thread for what it is.
Please don't push your own agenda on something that doesn't need it.
If you read about the influences off the soma clonal variation you will further understand the principles of the variation raised from the callus material & all forms of tissue culture..
I feel you have misunderstood what you have read about Kali..
I'm not pushing an agenda just putting the information out there..
Hope this helps
Maternal influence would be for example a mother plant that has been fed a veg feed that actually reduces rooting auxins in the plant tissue making clones take forever to root.. The plant tissue that responds to auxin is greater than that that produces it.. This is how that maternal influence would effect the mitosis derived tissue & not the crosses made by meiosis
It's blatantly obvious that all clones are tissue culture & they was bourn from various different tissues.. I find your lack of logic disturbing... These
Also the plants borne as a different variety will be different genetically or not just clonaly