S
Sertaiz
complement...
I don't understand? Was that a compliment or a slam? I kind of get the feeling you don't like me so... probably a slam. LOL
it is a strawman argument to say other sundry products are potentially toxic when the plant and the concentrated derivatives are not in order to justify the use of additional products for use in a cartridge
when the plant and the concentrated derivatives are not
The argument is that because the SDS says ar a certain dose, the product is dangerous.
It's not dynamics or projection.... everyone hates me. If you don't believe me, ask my Mom. LOL When your own Mother buys you a T-shirt that says, "Instant Asshole, Just Add Water", you can pretty much be sure you have burned through all your friends.
I suppose I should say something about terps so I don't drag this thread into a psychoanalysis of my issues. LOL
Terps are fun for everyone when enjoyed responsibly.
Strawman: A fallacious argument that distorts an opposing stance in order to make it easier to attack.
The argument is that because the SDS says ar a certain dose, the product is dangerous.
I did not distort this stance. I merely stated other examples of regularly consumed products that also have SDS that make similar claims.
Concentrated cannabis derived Terpenes are 100% toxic in high doses. Maybe that's not what you meant, but if it is I'll present the SDS sheets for commonly found cannabis terps to defend this statement.
I don't understand? Was that a compliment or a slam? I kind of get the feeling you don't like me so... probably a slam. LOL
It's not dynamics or projection.... everyone hates me. If you don't believe me, ask my Mom. LOL When your own Mother buys you a T-shirt that says, "Instant Asshole, Just Add Water", you can pretty much be sure you have burned through all your friends.
I suppose I should say something about terps so I don't drag this thread into a psychoanalysis of my issues. LOL
Terps are fun for everyone when enjoyed responsibly.
Strawman: A fallacious argument that distorts an opposing stance in order to make it easier to attack.
The argument is that because the SDS says ar a certain dose, the product is dangerous.
I did not distort this stance. I merely stated other examples of regularly consumed products that also have SDS that make similar claims.
Concentrated cannabis derived Terpenes are 100% toxic in high doses. Maybe that's not what you meant, but if it is I'll present the SDS sheets for commonly found cannabis terps to defend this statement.
You're clearly projecting "everybody hates me"...
Only you can change that programming.
I'm working on it myself.
all you have to do is pony up a report of anyone being made ill by the toxicity of naturally occurring secondary metabolites from a cannabis plant or naturally derived concentrates
personally I found that this constant driving to the surface of latent fears was a sign that it needed to be addressed and in doing so it helped me challenge and change the projection
Myrcene from cannabis, extracted and isolated, is just as toxic as myrcene from a bay tree.
Again, the poison is in the dose. I never said anyone was made ill from cannabis or its derivatives. But drink some cannabis derived isolated myrcene and you might be the first.
Bet you wouldn't survive eating more than 100g of distillate either...
I could care less what other people put in their bodies. If they want to buy non cannabis derived Terpenes to mix into their disty to smoke in carts, good for them. Not my place to tell them they can't do that. Not your place either.
My only goal here is to prove or disprove two important claims, that TT is putting mineral oil in their viscosity, and that TT is lying to people in general about what's in their Viscosity.
you are skirting my comments which makes me question your integrity
where in the history of use of this plant has the flowers or concentrates made for direct consumption made from those flowers contain toxic levels of terpenes?
I think bolded speaks volumes
one of the points I made in the eagle20 debacle was simply there is too much profit in growing (and in this case carts) to be lowering the bar for the sake of consumerism
Multiple companies are isolating Terpenes from cannabis right now, as we speak. I've helped setup multiple labs that are doing this, multiple different ways. The common denominator is that those isolated Terpenes, in concentrated form, are dangerous. Both highly flammable, and toxic.
So do you believe you should be in charge of what other people put in their body?
As for eagle20 (active ingredient myclobutanil) I fananced and developed a method for completely removing it from cannabis extracts, which I promptly open sourced.
https://future4200.com/t/internal-journal-futures-pesticide-remediation-tek/
Labeling and transparency should be required, not prohibition.
making a non toxic product potentially toxic for the sake of profiteering in a consumerist market is for shitty human beings who are afraid to make money without marginalization of others because it isn't that hard
it starts with giving a fuck more about humanity than instant personal gratification through income