I noticed the Oaxacan IBL too... finsihes in 8-8.5 weeks so doubtful to be "trip weed" but nice to see these guys looking back to a time when we valued different highs to those we see so often today
I noticed the Oaxacan IBL too... finsihes in 8-8.5 weeks so doubtful to be "trip weed" but nice to see these guys looking back to a time when we valued different highs to those we see so often today
Ace Purple Haze x Panama
Infinitesimal,
I have been having this difference of opinion with many different posters on this website. If I had to guess, > 90% of people believe what you are expressing. It sounds so perfectly logical, and when I was younger and less experienced, I argued the same theory. The only problem is that it is contrary to my total smoking and growing experience. It is virtually impossible to get anyone to take the contrary opinion seriously without smoke tests, double blind would be ideal, but I'm going to try... again.
I will start by conceding that every strain has it's own sweet spot of fertilizer level, and for the Headband previously posted, this over fertilization, IMHO, may not show significant loss of potency/quality at the nutrient level it has been exposed to. Only time and testing will tell. This is my first grow of this strain. Due to my experience, I highly doubt that this is the best I will be able to grow it. If it smokes reasonably well, I will grow again and do various tests of incrementally decreased nutrient levels from the current level, particularly nitrogen.
There are two other strains in the cabinet that I have grown previously, one of them several times. They are both suffering from the excess fertilizer, and it is visually obvious. I will use the extreme example to make my case.
First, since everyone seems to love a theory, I'll express a couple here. It may be correct that a plant needs rich fertilizer for a plant to produce the greatest amounts of THC, other cannabinoids, and terpenes, which so far are the chemicals that the plant produces that are generally recognized to affect our perceptions. However, I smoke buds, and it is the correct concentration of these chemicals in the flowers that is my goal. It must be stressed here that for some cannabinoids, for example CBD, it is desired to have these cannabinoids reduced. I may like the effects, and feel the effects in a more pronounced way in buds with 12% THC and .01% CBD, than I do with 25% THC and 1.0% CBD. I am making up these numbers and ratios without precise testing. However, I believe there has been enough testing that this notion is somewhat accepted, at least by many.
Here is the thing. We do not know all there is to know about what is affecting our perceptions of the potency and quality of the high experienced, and it is certain that our cultural experience and our unique brain chemistry affects our experience. What I do know is that pretending that we know all there is to know about the high we experience when smoking weed will inevitably lead us to incorrect conclusions. It may be that green chlorophyll modifies our experience with smoking buds by modifying the THC in a negative way, while yellow chlorophyll enhances the experience with THC and the other cannabinoids in the buds. In my 46+ years of smoking, the best buds were always "gold" (yellow), red, black (dark purple), brown, or some combinations of these colors with occasionally some green in the mix. Never in my life have I smoked a strongly green colored bud, and considered it one of the best that I have ever smoked. I will concede that I have smoked some light colored green bud that were world class, IMO.
The paragraph above addresses combinations of chemicals in the buds that are produced, which obviously vary depending on the fertilizer levels and curing conditions. After all, we can detect these differences with our eyes. I'm not just talking about THC, other cannabinoids, and terpenes. Buds are a complex soup of chemicals that we know very little about. The other thing that should be discussed is the physical structure of the buds. I am quite sure that varying levels of fertilizer, as well as varying levels and quality of light affect the tissue of the bud. These conditions not only affect the size of the resin glands, but also the surface area and thickness of the tissue that the resin glands grow from. These tissue differences and resin gland size differences are not optimized in a way that makes the overall bud most densely concentrated with resins and THC, when the plant is grown and flowered using rich fertilizer levels, in my experience. I hope I can make this obvious to the low nitrogen doubters with the following series of pictures.
Here are some pictures of a particular SAGE x Purple Haze Thai individual. The first picture shows a bud harvested at 9 weeks of flowering light timings. The first picture is of a grow that I consider a touch too green, slightly too much nitrogen, but it turned out pretty well, and can be roughly representative of the fertilizer level that I am targeting. This is one of the few strains that I have kept in my collection over the past decade:
View Image
Here are some pictures of the very same cutting at 7 weeks. Not only has the overdose in nitrogen severely and detrimentally affected the structure of the bud, and concentration of resin in the bud, but it is also very likely to delay the harvest time significantly:
View Image
View Image
Here is a picture that shows an over fertilized bud in the best condition that I can find:
View Image
Once again, this is the plant I grew with much less fertilizer, particularly nitrogen, but at an earlier stage of flowering. I'm guessing that this was close to 5 or 6 weeks of flowering:
View Image
This is a small slice, exaggerated at the high nitrogen side, of my overall experience with limiting nitrogen in my grows. I have seen a strain with "normal" fertilizer levels compared to extremely low levels. The extremely low level buds were smaller, very "gold" like, and had highly concentrated resin levels as compared to the higher fertilized, but still light green buds from the same cutting. The example of extremely reduced nitrogen had a cleaner high and was more potent by a factor of 2 or 3. This was for a particular strain, and this extreme reduction in nitrogen may not be applicable to all strains.
I have been given cuttings that I grew outside at moderately reduced nitrogen levels, compared to most growers, and when showing these buds to the person that gave me the cutting, they were surprised that they were grown outside. People in this area seem to prefer indoor buds. I think it is because, in general, the indoor looks less leafy and more resinous. Lowering levels of nitrogen can have the same effect.
I hope I did not completely waste my time writing this. Some people will not find it worthy of a thought, much less of a response. So be it. However, if one person out there somewhere is convinced to have an open mind and experiment a bit, then this has been time well spent.
ThaiBliss
Any reason to keep DS x HMBB clones in addition to keeping DS x HMBB f2 seeds?
Funny you mention... I just picked up some clones today, Maui, Sour Diesel, Tahoe OG..., and Girl Scout Cookies. The guy told me that the Girl Scout Cookies was very euphoric and upbeat.
If I come across Puna Budda, I'll give it a try.
Thanks!
If you want real trippy weed that makes your mind float: Purple Haze x Malawi!
I've smoked Zamaldelica as well and IMHO PHxM is better, much better.
It would be nice if someone could give a comparison of one of those 2 with CBG Destroyer.
Siever