What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

The Oregon Weed Thread -Grows, News and Laws and Whatever

R

Robrites

Portland, Oregon – The Oregon Liquor Control Commission today approved rules allowing

Portland, Oregon – The Oregon Liquor Control Commission today approved rules allowing

OLCC Approves Medical Bump-Up Canopy for Marijuana Producers



Establishes Sharing Framework between Producers and Patients


Portland, Oregon – The Oregon Liquor Control Commission today approved rules allowing growers licensed in Oregon’s Recreational Marijuana Program to grow marijuana specifically for Oregon Medical Marijuana Program (OMMP) cardholders. Under this “medical bump-up” arrangement recreational producers will be allowed to grow additional canopy above what is allowed in their OLCC license.

The new rules allow producers to enter into agreements with OMMP cardholders, however a medical cardholder can only have one assigned grower. Producers that decide to add medical bump up canopy can transfer useable marijuana to an OMMP cardholder.

If a cardholder allows, a producer may transfer excess to other cardholders and caregivers, and OMMP dispensaries and processors. All production and transfer of excess product is required to be tracked in the Cannabis Tracking System (CTS).

“This will be the first medically grown marijuana in Oregon under regulations that meet the compliance guidelines of the federal Cole Memo,” said Marvin Revoal, Acting Chair of the OLCC. “It’s important that we keep legally produced marijuana from being diverted to the illegal market, and again Oregon’s leadership shows that both medical and recreational marijuana can be regulated together.”

The OLCC already allows the sale of medical grade marijuana products by its licensed retailers and those products amount to about 14% of sales in the OLCC regulated environment. Under the bump-up rules up to 25% of the yield grown for an OMMP cardholder can be sold to OMMP processors and dispensaries.

Addressing the concern voiced by patients, doctors, and medical marijuana advocates that the three pound limit would create a medicine shortage for some patients, Commissioner Pamela Witherspoon called on the Commission to adopt an exception process for patients who need more medicine.

Steven Marks, the Commission’s Executive Director said the agency would monitor patients’ ability to obtain their medicine – especially those with serious illnesses, and act to ensure patient access to medicine either in partnership with the Oregon Health Authority, or within the OLCC’s own rulemaking authority.

“This approach strikes a balance in that it will cover the need of the majority of OMMP cardholders,” said Steven Marks, Executive Director of the OLCC. “At the same time the OLCC wants to help patients who are seriously ill be able to obtain whatever amount of cannabis-derived medicine they need to treat their illnesses and help them maintain or improve their quality of life.”

The OLCC will monitor the implementation of the bum-up canopy rules and if necessary adjust the rules as the agency learns more from producers and OMMP cardholders who participate in the bump-up program. The bump-up rules take effect on May 1, 2017.
 
R

Robrites

Apply for a fall controlled hunt by Monday, May 15

Apply for a fall controlled hunt by Monday, May 15

Monday, May 01, 2017

SALEM, Ore.— Fall may be months away but it’s time to start planning your big game hunt. Don’t forget to apply for a controlled hunt by Monday, May 15 at 11:59 p.m. PT.

Apply online, at a license sales agent or ODFW office that sells licenses, or by mail/fax order. The cost is $8 per application and hunters need a 2017 annual hunting license to apply.
Last year, more than half of the 467,028 applications were submitted in the last week before the deadline, including nearly 74,149 on deadline day. Many hunters wait till the last minute to apply, which can cause long lines at license sales stores and ODFW offices.

“Get your application in early to avoid the long lines and if you do wait until the last minute, be sure to check store hours where you plan to apply,” recommends Linda Lytle, ODFW license sales manager. ‘Remember you can submit an application online until 11:59 p.m. PT on May 15.”

Lytle also urged hunters to avoid common mistakes on applications. “Double check your hunt number against the 2017 Oregon Big Game Regulations, make sure your party leader number is correct, and check your current preference points at the My Hunter Information page,” she said. “And before you walk out of the store or ODFW office, check your application to be sure it's correct.”

New this year as part of efforts to simplify the regulations, final tag numbers are already printed in the 2017 Oregon Big Game Regulations. (Previously, big game tag numbers for fall were not formally adopted until June.) Due to the severe winter in parts of eastern Oregon and higher winter mortality of wildlife, there have been some tag reductions for deer and pronghorn hunts in Baker, Union and northern Malheur county units. More information

ODFW limits the number of tags for some hunts (all rifle deer and most rifle elk hunting in eastern Oregon, plus all pronghorn, Rocky Mtn goat and bighorn sheep hunting) to fairly distribute tags and control hunting pressure. Hunters who apply for one of the controlled deer, elk or pronghorn hunts and don’t draw their first choice receive a preference point for that hunt series, which increases their chances the following year.

While the most sought after hunts can take more than 10 years to draw, every hunter has a chance to draw each year. Only 75 percent of tags are awarded based on preference points; the remaining 25 percent are awarded randomly among first choice applicants. Find out more about how the process works on ODFW’s Controlled Hunts page.

2016 Premium Hunt Winners rave about experience

Last year was the first year that Oregon offered “Premium Hunts,” special deer, elk and pronghorn tags with a months-long hunting season that includes both early and late season opportunity. The same number of tags are available this year—one Premium Deer tag in each of Oregon’s 67 wildlife management units, one Premium Elk tag in 59 hunts, and one Premium Pronghorn tag in 27 hunts. (A few elk and pronghorn Premium Hunts include two units.)

Unlike regular controlled hunts, Premium Hunts don’t use preference points, so every hunter who applies has the same chance ever year. Premium Hunts are also considered additional hunting opportunities, meaning hunters who draw one of these tags can still hunt on a regular controlled or general season big game tag. The hunts are open to both residents and non-residents and are not “once-in-a-lifetime” hunts, so hunters can reapply even if they drew a Premium Hunt tag last year. Applications also cost $8 and Premium Hunt tags are the same price as other deer, elk and pronghorn tags.

While the bag limit for Premium Hunts is any-sex, most 2016 Premium Hunt winners took a male animal. Among hunters who reported, 39 Premium Deer hunters took four-point bucks and 18 Premium Elk hunters took six-point bulls.

Second-year hunter Kayla Hathorn of Bonanza, Ore. says “I’ve never seen, or imagined getting any harvest larger than a four-point.” She took a six-point buck in the Sprague Unit.

“The length of the hunt gave me a chance to grow as a beginner elk hunter and I really became a better elk hunter overall,” said Nick Baszler of Creswell, Ore., who took an impressive elk in Sled Springs Unit.

Kent Berkey of Enterprise, Ore. took a very nice mule deer buck in the Imnaha Unit. “I looked at over 60 bucks, all on public lands, and saw two bigger than the one I harvested,” he said.

Tim Mickelson of Independence, Ore. took a “speedgoat” aka a pronghorn in Beatys Butte. “It was so nice being able to hunt speed goats that had not been pressured by other hunters,” Mickelson said. “Thank you ODFW for the unique opportunity to harvest this unique, beautiful, symbol of the American West.”

The most applied-for units for Premium Hunt applications last year were Metolius for deer, Mt Emily for elk and Juniper for pronghorn while the least applied-for were Sixes for deer, Klamath Falls for elk, and Sprague for pronghorn.

See pictures of the winners, hear their stories and learn more at ODFW’s Premium Hunts page or Facebook page. Applications for Premium Hunts are also due by May 15, 2017.
 

Aota1

Member
Wholesalers/Retailers
9:30 a.m Check-in
10 a.m. Rules & Compliance
10:45 a.m. Break
11 a.m Metrc
12 p.m. Lunch Break – Networking
1 p.m. Pesticides
1:45 p.m. Packaging & Labeling
2;45 p.m. Break
3:00 p.m. Taxes
3:15 p.m. General Q&A session

Gonna be a lively day haha
 

LowFalutin

Stems Analyst
Veteran
Oregon bill to ban firing employees for off-duty marijuana use dies in Senate

Oregon bill to ban firing employees for off-duty marijuana use dies in Senate

:(

BY HILLARY BORRUD [email protected]
SALEM -- Oregonians who'd hoped for an end to workplace marijuana testing are out of luck. Employers may still require their workers to pass a drug test, after a bill that would have banned the practice hit a dead-end in the state Senate.

Although Senate Bill 301 survived a crucial April 18 deadline for lawmakers to vote it out of committee, backers now acknowledge they lack support to bring it up for a vote in the full Senate.

Leland Berger, a lawyer and longtime cannabis law reform advocate in Portland, said proponents were unable to line up enough votes to guarantee passage in the Senate and without that, Senate President Peter Courtney would not schedule a vote.

Supporters said the bill was necessary to fix a discrepancy: employers can still make passing a cannabis test a condition of employment, two years after the state legalized recreational pot and nearly two decades into Oregon's medical marijuana program.

Some people have said they were fired for using the drug outside of work, including a morning weekend anchor at Eugene's ABC affiliate who said she was fired in 2015 after testing positive for marijuana.

Senate Bill 301 would have expanded existing protections for tobacco consumers, to prevent employers from requiring employees to abstain from any substance that is legal in Oregon as long as it's consumed outside of work hours and doesn't interfere with the employee's duties.

Before the bill died, legislators added an amendment that would have narrowed it to protect only medical marijuana users.

Berger said the amended version of the bill still would have protected medical marijuana patients, who can be fired for using the drug under a 2010 Oregon Supreme Court ruling.

"The people are far ahead of the government on these issues," Berger said. "When you talk to people, it's kind of a no-brainer that unless the person's impaired at work, what difference does their off-site use make?"

Several business groups raised concerns about the bill, including the Oregon Metals Industry Council. James L. Wilson, the group's executive director, pointed out that businesses with federal contracts must maintain drug-free workplaces and employees in the industry "also operate heavy machinery and follow strict safety guidelines" to ensure safety for themselves and co-workers.

-- Hillary Borrud

http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/...to_ban_firing_empl.html#incart_river_home_pop
 

Aota1

Member
The workshop was mostly a rerun for me but i did learn a few new things related to rules and such. Reps from metrc, olcc, and oda were there. Department of revenue didn't show (probably too busy counting all the �� haha) interesting tidbit about pesticides testing. Spinosad is only tested for because if they didn't test for it, that specific lack of oversight regarding spinosad on a crop we smoke, would open the door for the feds to come in and take over. The state dept of ag can be overseen by the fda for not complying with general federal testing guidelines for crops.
 

OregonBorn

Active member
Spinosad is highly toxic to bees. Its considered 'organic' but kills bees which are in rapid decline from CCD. One of many reasons that I consider the organic labeling scheme as crap. It has rather low toxicity in mammals though, and common in cat and dog edible flea medication. UC Davis information on it

http://ipm.ucanr.edu/TOOLS/PNAI/pnaishow.php?id=65

OHA issued an alert for spinosad found in marijuana in McMinneville a while back

http://www.oregon.gov/oha/news/Pages/OHA%20issues%20health%20alert%20for%20pesticide-tainted%20marijuana.aspx
 

Aota1

Member
Spinosad is highly toxic to bees. Its considered 'organic' but kills bees which are in rapid decline from CCD. One of many reasons that I consider the organic labeling scheme as crap. It has rather low toxicity in mammals though, and common in cat and dog edible flea medication. UC Davis information on it

http://ipm.ucanr.edu/TOOLS/PNAI/pnaishow.php?id=65

OHA issued an alert for spinosad found in marijuana in McMinneville a while back

http://www.oregon.gov/oha/news/Pages/OHA%20issues%20health%20alert%20for%20pesticide-tainted%20marijuana.aspx
I'm definitely not advocating it's use. Just passing along info. That recall is well known and the one's that followed for pyrethrins
 

Aota1

Member
The testing caught it. The problem on that one was with the grower distribution company and shop. Crazy and i know that distribution co. I thinks it's crazy how little of the product where i came from in California is tested for pesticides at all.
 
R

Robrites

Making a road-trip to Lakeview soon. Anyone know what the weed scene is like down that way?
 

OregonBorn

Active member
The testing caught it. The problem on that one was with the grower distribution company and shop. Crazy and i know that distribution co. I thinks it's crazy how little of the product where i came from in California is tested for pesticides at all.

Well, up until now, nothing was ever tested. Black market weed could have anything in it. I got some of the most beautiful golden weed back in the day and sent it in for testing and it came back positive for Paraquat. That was in the 1970s. The rest? Who knows. I started growing my own in the 1980s. Dunno what they allow in Washington state. California has a plan in place to test pretty definitively.
 

OregonBorn

Active member
http://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2016/11/14_marijuana_strain_names_bann.html

The OLCC banned these 14 strain names in Oregon saying they appeal to kids: Girl Scout Cookies, Grape Ape, Bruce Banner, Candyland, Charlotte's Web, Cinderella, Dr Who, Bubbleicious, Smurf, Death Star, Skywalker, Jedi Kush, LSD, and Blow.

Now let me get this straight. Names like LSD and Blow will appeal to children, but names like Bubblegum, Cotton Candy, and Cherry Pie will not? WTF? The OLCC is completely demented!
 

frostqueen

Active member
http://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2016/11/14_marijuana_strain_names_bann.html

The OLCC banned these 14 strain names in Oregon saying they appeal to kids: Girl Scout Cookies, Grape Ape, Bruce Banner, Candyland, Charlotte's Web, Cinderella, Dr Who, Bubbleicious, Smurf, Death Star, Skywalker, Jedi Kush, LSD, and Blow.

Now let me get this straight. Names like LSD and Blow will appeal to children, but names like Bubblegum, Cotton Candy, and Cherry Pie will not? WTF? The OLCC is completely demented!

Meanwhile, any refrigerator that kids have full access to can be well-stocked with Mike's Hard lemonade, Chocolate Stout, Hard Root Beer... the blatant double-standard is just amazing. The level of cluelessness in some of these policies is obvious.
 

seeded

Active member
Meanwhile, any refrigerator that kids have full access to can be well-stocked with Mike's Hard lemonade, Chocolate Stout, Hard Root Beer... the blatant double-standard is just amazing. The level of cluelessness in some of these policies is obvious.

Good point. Let's insist that for people to have alcohol and children in the same home they need to have the alcohol in a locked refrigerator that the children can't access. We should also insist that they put child proof caps on every bottle for when the children inevitably get past the locks to slow their toxic consumption down.

Also we need to raise taxes and allow surprise property inspections to ensure compliance with the laws. It's a public health and safety issue that deals with children so who could be against it? :laughing:
 

OregonBorn

Active member
It seems that Oregon dispensaries are listing all 14 banned strain names on Lea fly. So I presume that these OLCC rules are rather toothless?
 
R

Robrites

picture.php
 
Top