reg seed would be dioecious, fem seed monoecious.
The fact that you can reverse most plants and that there are still large degrees of sexual expression on the plant would probably classify it as subdioecious or something that is in between the two.
Selecting and breeding artificial populations is kind of the argument here, but unless someone has created a purely female seed lot the plants will revert themselves back to more normal forms of sexual expression. You can debate weather intersex forms are natural or not.
one dude growing six seeds that he purchased probably means a few thousand more people are growing the same seed. Thats more people with less plants each to look at and a higher degree of selection then one dude in a large field.
The fact that you can reverse most plants and that there are still large degrees of sexual expression on the plant would probably classify it as subdioecious or something that is in between the two.
Selecting and breeding artificial populations is kind of the argument here, but unless someone has created a purely female seed lot the plants will revert themselves back to more normal forms of sexual expression. You can debate weather intersex forms are natural or not.
one dude growing six seeds that he purchased probably means a few thousand more people are growing the same seed. Thats more people with less plants each to look at and a higher degree of selection then one dude in a large field.