makes total sense
So many reasons. But, in a nutshell, They want to create problems that are global in scale so that they can embolden the UN as our one world government master. They wanted to solve the "climate crisis" that they are creating, by rolling out the very same tchnology as the solution and own the weather and have multinational corporations manage it and we would pay them. But, in the meantime, they can create famines, water shortages, relocation of populations (especially the poor), institute total control (just like COVID), they wanted to open up the arctic for shipping by maintaining an open ice free sea. And for political and psychological warfare objectives. They want to clear forests around the world for agricultural industries. Many, many strategic goals.
They want to control people with fear. They want mass psychosis to take hold.
They want to undue national sovereignty and basic human rights and enslave people and treat them like livestock. They want to make people think that humans are destructive and a danger to our own species survival and make people demand control by governmental authorities.
After you're done lol'ing, please explain how consensus is scientific. Scientific discovery is frequently made by one dude observing repeatable results. It's not a democratic process.
UN's climate change report issued a 'code red for humanity'. Is there anything we can do to fix it?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...mate-change-united-nations-report/5544079001/
scientific consensus means more than one dude can observe and repeat the results. if only one guy can achieve or replicate the results then that's a grift, not science. so, one dude saying Manhattan will be underwater by 2020 is almost meaningless. you can find one scientist saying almost anything, including that blacks have lower IQ than other humans, that doesn't make it true now does it? show me 1,000 or 10,000 scientists saying that and then i'll change my tune.
After you're done lol'ing, please explain how consensus is scientific. Scientific discovery is frequently made by one dude observing repeatable results. It's not a democratic process.
Not at all. Trump still broke the law doing what he did.Does "Sharpie-gate" make a little more sense now?
Dude Scientist collaborate often.
Scientific consensus= The collective judgment, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of study. Consensus generally implies agreement of the super majority.
...by the Counterfeit News Network? ROTFLMAO, really?
...no wonder why you are so often wrong, lol.