https://www.bestplaces.net/voting/city/colorado/denver
Maybe all that dankness will help turn Denver red?
Maybe all that dankness will help turn Denver red?
The 2020 Presidential Election
- Thread starter Zeez
- Start date
- Status
The GOP is fueled more by cocaine.
George owns rare dankness. In a city that votes more than 70% liberal. I think he needs a giant Republican shithead flag so his shoppers have the right to vote with their money.
No shit?!
I am glad to make the capitalistic decision to take them off of my plans. That was timely. I will spread the word.
I am glad to make the capitalistic decision to take them off of my plans. That was timely. I will spread the word.
I let a bunch of Denver people know on a music forum. Not one single shithead supporter on that forum. They will spread that info fast.
No no no Hillary was the identity politics crap .Bernie was the socialist and shoulda been the nominee till Hill pulled the rug...Either way ends in Trump's victory.This year Angry Amy yeah ok.Mayor Pete "the homo"Bernie same ole socialism Elizabeth "I'm a white iIndian women of color I swear" Warren...Socialism and identity politics . Mike im not always racist but when i am I'm mike bloomberg Bloomberg also trying to sound "woke"...The Democrats are a mess they'll never back Bernie Biden is done probably going to jail after Bill Barr gets finished they have no ideas and no answers to Trumps resounding success despite their fighting him the entire way...Just sit back watch your 401K get fat and enjoy the prosperity for at least 4 more yearsOooooooohhhh, you sound like a real authority on the matter
Hilary Clinton 'socialist agenda'?? George W Brainwashed
I hope you don't lose so much that you depend on socialized healthcare.
Bernie 2020
Everyone else can go fuck themselves. They are all just part of the problem.
Everyone else can go fuck themselves. They are all just part of the problem.
Another trump supporter?
C
Capra ibex
i was being stupid
Last edited:
All the shithead supporters should show themselves. Many are business owners and we deserve to know who we spend our money on. If they can talk shithead shit online. They need a giant shithead flag in front of their business.
Rare shitness lol
Rare shitness lol
Lets move on from talking about 'shithead' or whoever for a moment - and step into the discussion about socialism/communism - since many have been voicing their concerns over this due to Bernie Saunders stating he was a 'Democratic Socialist' - and so the link is made from socialism to communism - the question is, are they one and the same? - or does socialism = communism lite? -
I did a little rooting around on the internet and came up with the name Ayn Rand -
Rand advocated reason as the only means of acquiring knowledge and rejected faith and religion - She supported rational and ethical egoism and rejected altruism - In politics, she condemned the initiation of force as immoral and opposed collectivism and statism as well as anarchism, instead supporting laissez-faire capitalism, which she defined as the system based on recognizing individual rights, including property rights. In art, Rand promoted romantic realism. She was sharply critical of most philosophers and philosophical traditions known to her, except for Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas and classical liberals.
Ayn Rand (/aɪn/; born Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum;[a] February 2 1905 – March 6, 1982) was a Russian-American writer and philosopher. She is known for her two best-selling novels, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, and for developing a philosophical system she named Objectivism. Educated in Russia, she moved to the United States in 1926. She had a play produced on Broadway in 1935 and 1936. After two early novels that were initially unsuccessful, she achieved fame with her 1943 novel, The Fountainhead. In 1957, Rand published her best-known work, the novel Atlas Shrugged. Afterward, she turned to non-fiction to promote her philosophy, publishing her own periodicals and releasing several collections of essays until her death in 1982.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand
George, You're back! Already?
I think we are in need of a new form of socialism. This is the first time in history we have the education and knowledge as well as the communication and infrastructure to truly start using our resources to better everyone's lives. There is no reason for hungry people or people with no healthcare. Not just here but anywhere.
I do not think we need a socialism that prevents some degree of capitalism. Let people work hard and have more if they choose. But the laws need to bring everybody's quality of life up to a point they can actually have the same opportunity to improve.
And people should not be able to aquire enough wealth to influence laws. Particularly to influence laws the negatively affect others as a means of acquiring more wealth.
I do not think we need a socialism that prevents some degree of capitalism. Let people work hard and have more if they choose. But the laws need to bring everybody's quality of life up to a point they can actually have the same opportunity to improve.
And people should not be able to aquire enough wealth to influence laws. Particularly to influence laws the negatively affect others as a means of acquiring more wealth.
communism has a very precise accepted definition
it's described in detail by the books of Karl Marx
socialism does not have such a precise definition
it has been used over many years to loosely describe a philosophy of government
opposing sides use their own definitions, the end result is argument over what socialism means
word wars
it's described in detail by the books of Karl Marx
socialism does not have such a precise definition
it has been used over many years to loosely describe a philosophy of government
opposing sides use their own definitions, the end result is argument over what socialism means
word wars
There should definitely be more fair wealth distribution - but how do you go about that?
First would you raid all of those off-shore trusts and funds - and take the money back from the oligarchs/billionaires? - then what - just give it away to poor people? - how do you determine what is 'poor' and what is not - and just giving away things tends to create dependants - who then will expect to be gifted a living - so might refuse to work at all -
First would you raid all of those off-shore trusts and funds - and take the money back from the oligarchs/billionaires? - then what - just give it away to poor people? - how do you determine what is 'poor' and what is not - and just giving away things tends to create dependants - who then will expect to be gifted a living - so might refuse to work at all -
You put it into the community's. Healthcare. Schools. City gardens. Build infrastructure that helps poor areas access the same nice stuff well to do areas have. You put it everywhere it has been missing from.
- Status
