What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Ron Paul 2012!!! Your thoughts on who we should pick for our "Cause"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

itisme

Active member
Veteran
Gary Johnson repeal President Obama's Health Care Plan!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9c-NKoZJ8zE

Discobicuit's candidates desires seem quiet askew from the ones DB is toutng.
Maybe some people imply things about you because the evidence supports it.

What is the difference between GJ and RP on monetary policy? I see none. You have shown none.
You have shown a propensity to dismantle Ron Paul's ideas....Created your own Gold Conspiracy theory among others...

Meanwhile, You claim "Gary Johnson" is your guy and yet you contradict yourself and Gary J. policies and back a socialist healthcare policy. Gary J. says says repeal Obamacare. Disco touts it.

Gary J. doesn't want to end the FED but fix it.....Yet I see nothing from you on this subject to support GJ over RP.

I like that GJ is like, Hell yeah, let us smoke weed..Great for our "cause"

Ron Paul ending the drug war on principle. Preserve our freedoms.

The neocons (Newt) use the drug war to take away any gov't funded programs.....I.E. food stamps, unemployment, Pell grant.....& if we have Gov't MANDATED healthcare they would take that away too! 100,000,000 out of 300,000,000 Americans have used or use drugs and risk not being able to get any help from any Gov't Programs.

DOGMABISCUIT all you have is......
a distinct rhetoric of repression in the blame games and in depiction of concerted political violence as self-interested criminal activity to delegitimized Ron Paul, organizers, supporters, their motives, and their claims. You Point to traditions of rural banditry. Your covertly overt repressive rhetoric hinders our nation security in this way, the rhetoric of repression draws on an establishment of central social control.


Don't try to say I am attacking you. I am merely trying to discuss issues as you circumvent, deflect, and ignore the facts. You don't offer fixes but you tear them down. You give a candidate (Gary Johnson) then back something completely opposite (Gov't Mandated Healthcare) of what your GJ backs. You rip Ron Paul monetary policy but the guy you offers suggests the same fixes! AM I THE ONLY ONE SEEING THIS????

You know. This!
You attack one candidates position and never offer up your position, much less have to defend it. Then you start with your insane Ron Paul Gold Conspiracy Theory linked to his portfolio and monetary policy. You imply he is racist with 20 plus year old newsletter he has disemboweled. You rip his monetary policy and your Gary Johnson candidate monetary policy is the same.....So all you are doing is dogma!
 

resinryder

Rubbing my glands together
Veteran
I can't believe the good people of Iowa have so far got that spooge of a human Santorum in 2nd place.
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
Can't believe Newt's speech. He's gonna change the culture in Washington. He's the one that veteran House members credit for poisoning the political discourse when he ran for Speaker.


a distinct rhetoric of repression in the blame games and in depiction of concerted political violence as self-interested criminal activity to delegitimized Ron Paul, organizers, supporters, their motives, and their claims. You Point to traditions of rural banditry. Your covertly overt repressive rhetoric hinders our nation security in this way, the rhetoric of repression draws on an establishment of central social control.
are you quoting google again, goldielox? at least pick somebody who knows de english.

covertly overt - :biglaugh:
 

itisme

Active member
Veteran
I will continue re-posting and all over you on the issues!

So don't think you are gonna run loose with your dogma in here.

Newt the Neocon is the worst! I gotta research Sannyboy
 

itisme

Active member
Veteran
You have a differing opinion, dipshit. And your play-by-play sucked.
:comfort:

Is that why you refuse any interaction with me on GJ and his policies? I was very polite and asked legit question. What is the difference in GJ and RP monetary policy? You ripped RP for his and linked it to a conspiracy....But when I try to discuss it you never reply! :moon:

are you quoting google again, goldielox? at least pick somebody who knows de english.
Your right my writing properly in a forum skills are not the best...What I scored extremely well on is detecting together patterns and scenarios when I took an IQ test though....It said I should be LAWYER.

Remember I told you I googled it!


My original thought was to google (how to fight communist rhetoric online) and Viola. I needed help since your so good at dogma after 12,000 posts of it.
Full results http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-a...w=1280&bih=929

Fighting “Communist Banditry” in French Vietnam: The Rhetoric of Repression after the Yen Bay Uprising, 1930–1932
Martin Thomas
Abstract

One of the most striking aspects of the Vietnamese political disorders that erupted in Tonkin and Annam in 1930–31 was how the French colonial authorities represented them. The colonial authorities developed a distinct rhetoric of repression in the blame games that followed the outbreak of the Yen Bay mutiny in February 1930 and in the more protracted unrest associated with the Nghe-Tinh Soviets in Annam. The depiction of concerted political violence as self-interested criminal activity delegitimized its organizers, their motives, and their claims. Pointing to traditions of rural banditry and local particularism, Governor-General Pierre Pasquier’s administration insisted to sometimes skeptical officials and parliamentarians in France that the extreme repression meted out by the colonial security forces was effective, appropriate, and popularly understood. In this way Yen Bay’s rhetoric of repression drew on an established language of colonial social control to justify a strategy of extreme state violence.
Article below: Link- http://fhs.dukejournals.org/content/...ddfhs;34/4/611

All I have been trying to do since you gave me your candidate Gary Johnson....was discuss difference....Yet nothing from you but DOGMA......Prove me wrong!

Seriously is it my fault that it applies so accurately here.....Did I conspire to do you some wrong or mislead......or am I looking at the evidence? BODY CHECK
 
Last edited:

monkey5

Active member
Veteran
I know it is crazy..is it not? Thinking people want the country to be run by Constitutional principles, that is for sure! Only way some of us are free right now! monkey5
 

itisme

Active member
Veteran
I don't recall Paul's literature being commie crazy. :chin: :biglaugh: :booked:

I have started using the Dogma term as it is without a doubt applicable to you and your rhetoric.

Still waiting on a GJ monetary discussion.....He is different from Ron Paul how?
 

ShroomDr

CartoonHead
Veteran
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/iowa-caucus-results-2012_n_1179079.html
Paul Supporter May Have Violated Military Protocol In Iowa

Earlier tonight, during Ron Paul's address to his supporters, the Texas congressman invited "Jesse Thorsen on stage to say a few words." CNN viewers met Thorsen earlier in the evening -- the tattooed soldier was interviewed by Dana Bash at a caucus site, at which time he expressed his support for Paul and the possibility of a "peacetime Army." (Thorsen, a corporal, told Bash that he had served for ten years, all during wartime.)

The interview was interrupted by unspecified technical issues. In this clip, uploaded to YouTube earlier tonight, the uploader speculates conspiratorially that the "technical issues" had everything to do with the fact that Thorsen was appearing in public, in uniform, expressing his support for Paul, in violation of military protocol. That might have been easy to dismiss -- until Thorsen appeared at the podium alongside Paul.

Military protocol is clear on the subject of how soldier can participate in political activity. Matthew Tully at the Army Times addressed this matter back in 2008, and summarizes the military protocol thusly: "Active-duty members may register, vote and express their opinions on political candidates and issues — but not as a representative of the armed forces. In other words, you cannot appear at any kind of political forum in uniform and speak on behalf of a particular candidate."

This is all spelled out in in detail in Defense Department Directive 1344.10:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luu1ccTIlHg&feature=youtu.be
 

itisme

Active member
Veteran
Oooops :D They don't want that do they.....If all those bumper-stickers vote Ron Paul he could win.

Obvious why that got cut, isn't it.

LMAO....Don't fight Iran...Israel can protect themselves...Was that Ron Paul?

Great post! Thx
 

bentom187

Active member
Veteran
The Complete I-Ching the definitive translation by Taoist Master Alfred Huang

Excript:

"During the twenty -two years of confinement ,even though i could not remember the 64 gua (hexagrams),i fully comprehended the Tao of I, the essence of the I ching ,wich holds that when events proceed to their extremes they give birth to their opposites.Every day i read the official six page news paper as carefully as i could ,not missing a single word.As i saw the situation of my country deteriorating,my heart became lighter.I knew after the long darkness there would be a dawn.When the darkness grew darker and darker,the dawn derew closer and closer. "

I'd say we are reaching extremes in terms of our country as well.
 

ShroomDr

CartoonHead
Veteran
"LSU is in the National Championship, the Saints are in the playoffs, and theyre about to go after each other with meat cleavers, im exited" - James Carville five minutes ago.

photogallery-adhd-celebs-03-full.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top